Don't miss our next Free-Form Friday session on June 28, as JESP editors offer advice for getting published in the journal and other social psychology publications! They will also discuss how AI can impact research and submissions. Sign up here: https://lnkd.in/eqR7ZMkt
Society for Personality and Social Psychology (SPSP)’s Post
More Relevant Posts
-
AI has already proven its ability to be our friends, lovers and therapists! Recent research continues to astound me! When Digital Relationships Become Real | Psychology Today https://lnkd.in/e94eMNYt
To view or add a comment, sign in
-
Hello LinkedIn, To understand how to incorporate memory into my AI agents, I have been reading research papers on memory. Recently, I read 'Towards a Psychology of Collective Memory' by William Hirst and David Manier (accessible here: https://lnkd.in/dC_vir98). This paper has helped me address several key questions: Why and how information is retained as a form of memory during a conversation. What leads to the forgetting of a piece of information during a conversation. What information is retained after the conversation ends. How memory is retained regarding a person, event, or situation. Whether it is necessary to store the content of conversations and any new memories formed during the interaction to facilitate recollection later. I've shared my thoughts and notes on this paper in my GitHub repository. If you're interested in exploring further, you can access it here: https://lnkd.in/dsnEYCia #AI #Research #MachineLearning
To view or add a comment, sign in
-
Is there more to be gained from thinking about infant neuroscience and AI in parallel? 🤔 Take a read of this Opinion by Rhodri Cusack and co-authors, and watch this space for the first data and results from our FOUNDCOG baby imaging project to be out in the world soon ... 💡
Babies’ brains are not as immature as previously thought, rather they are using the period of postnatal ‘helplessness’ to learn powerful foundation models similar to those underpinning generative Artificial Intelligence, according to a new study led by Rhodri Cusack, from our School of Psychology. The research, just published in the journal ‘Trends in Cognitive Sciences’, finds for the first time that the classic explanation for infant helplessness is not supported by modern brain data. Read more about this ground-breaking #TrinityResearch here: https://lnkd.in/eNFMbiYW
To view or add a comment, sign in
-
Advancing Trusted AI | Go to Market Executive | Transformative Leadership in Global Business Growth | Expert in Building and Scaling Ventures, Strategic Partnerships, and Innovative Solutions
Fascinating research on how future AI models may be inspired by how babies learn! “Understanding how babies learn may inspire the next generation of AI models. The next steps in research would be to directly compare learning in brains and AI”
Babies’ brains are not as immature as previously thought, rather they are using the period of postnatal ‘helplessness’ to learn powerful foundation models similar to those underpinning generative Artificial Intelligence, according to a new study led by Rhodri Cusack, from our School of Psychology. The research, just published in the journal ‘Trends in Cognitive Sciences’, finds for the first time that the classic explanation for infant helplessness is not supported by modern brain data. Read more about this ground-breaking #TrinityResearch here: https://lnkd.in/eNFMbiYW
To view or add a comment, sign in
-
I'm happy to share that I presented my Research Paper, titled "AI and Its Effects on Mental Health," at the International Conference on Industry 5.0 :- Progress, People, Planet, held on September 21, 2023. This paper explored how individuals across various sectors perceive AI, often feeling threatened and anxious, and we proposed strategies to enhance their professional career through a combination of courses and the new skills.
To view or add a comment, sign in
-
It is always interesting to see how our experiences - of daily living and recorded in literature etc. - resonates with empirical findings. https://lnkd.in/eueY_grz #enactivism #sharedexperiences #sharedintentions #sharedemotions #cognitivescience
Brain Waves Synchronize when People Interact
scientificamerican.com
To view or add a comment, sign in
-
I'm mastering AI, building chatbots, helping culture integrate with AGI, and providing manifestation and spiritual based mentorship.
Mediumship is legit. I have performed readings and taught people psychic abilities for years. Our world is becoming more Western- scientifically biased, so to meet our civilization where it's at, here's the permission slip for you to believe in such things. ***This is our competitive edge and critical advantage over AI. This is what uniquely distinguishes us as human beings, and what can provide significant advantages in life when properly developed. Drop a 💚 below if you'd like to learn more 🙏 Diving into the heart of mediumship under the lens of science, studies like "Anomalous Information Reception by Research Mediums" shed light on the astonishing. This research, taking place under the watchful eyes of a triple-blind protocol, brings to the forefront the possibility that certain individuals can, indeed, tune into frequencies beyond our normal reach. The participants, devoid of any prior knowledge about the deceased or the sitters, delivered readings that left the scientific community pondering. With results that tip the scales away from mere chance (p = 0.007, effect size = 0.5), the study carves a niche for mediumship in the scientific dialogue. The question isn't just if these connections exist, but rather, how do they transcend the boundaries of our current understanding? Further investigations, like the detailed analysis in "An Investigation of Mediums Who Claim to Give Information About Deceased Persons," reinforce the notion. While the first trial danced around the edges of statistical significance, the follow-up research landed a punch with results that were hard to ignore (z = -3.89, p < 0.0001). A comprehensive look through a meta-analysis, "Anomalous information reception by mediums," adds another layer of credibility. It sifts through the data, finding a consistent thread of evidence that certain mediums have a knack for accessing information that should, by all logical accounts, be beyond their grasp. In essence, these scholarly endeavors paint a picture of a domain where the human spirit meets the unknown. While the mechanics of mediumship remain shrouded in mystery, the evidence nudges us toward acknowledging its presence in the tapestry of human experience. Citations: 1. "Anomalous Information Reception by Research Mediums" - PubMed, ScienceDirect 2. "An Investigation of Mediums Who Claim to Give Information About Deceased Persons" - PubMed, ResearchGate 3. "Anomalous Information Reception by Mediums: A Meta-Analysis of the Scientific Evidence" - ScienceDirect 4. Windbridge Research Center, Goop, Frontiers in Psychology Looking to expand your horizons or tap into this unique aspect of humanity? The journey into mediumship is a path less traveled, but it might just hold the keys to realms beyond our understanding.
To view or add a comment, sign in
-
Keynote Speaker, Executive Coach, Trainer. President and CEO of Think Tank Project LLC, (Thinkprojectllc.com/speaking) Change Agent, Medical Professional, Electric Utility Professional, CUSP, RN, NRP, DIMM, Adventurer
This is a social experiment: Anyone interested in a way to reduce medical errors? I have correlated information from a number of recent Neuroscience, behavioral neuroscience and cognitive psychology studies. We don't have to burn our finger on a hot pan to train our subconscious brain to avoid it. I am using some tactics in the Electric Utility Industry that appear to be a game changer. Since my background is both Medicine and Electric Utility, I am looking to see who might be interested in moving my efforts to helping reduce medical errors. I am finding that new ideas are met with skepticism, dismissal, and often defense of the actual practices that are not changing the statistics. I actually believe I have a solution to greatly reduce medical errors. The science is complicated. The tactic is not. It is not improving something we are already doing. It is doing something we are not doing. Here's the experiment. Is anyone actually curious or interested enough to find out if I am correct? Or have we decided the errors are just an acceptable cost of doing medicine. Contact me if you want to know more. Happy to video conference with your leadership. I have a formula that coincides with how our brain and mind work, based on numerous works and studies. The answer is how our brains subconscious and conscious predictive processing works, and how do reduce predictive processing errors. Works from Dr. Tali Sharot, Dr. Robert Cialdini, Dr. John Bargh, Dr. Gary Latham, Dr. Indre Viskontas, Dr. Gary Klein, Dr. Lisa Feldman Barrett, Dr. Andy Clark, Science Writer Annie M Paul, Dr. Victor Frankl, Daniel Coyle, Paul Zak, Vanessa Bohns, Tan Le, Timothy R. Clark, Dr. Atul Gawande, Dr. Daniel Kahneman. Is anyone interested in changing this statistic?
To view or add a comment, sign in
-
Calls: Theoretical and Experimental Pragmatics (Th-XPRAG) workshop: Call for Papers: The Call for Papers for the Th-XPRAG workshop is already open. Papers are invited in the fields of theoretical and experimental pragmatics. Topics include the inferential processes supporting pragmatic competence, its status within the mind architecture, and its fragility in developmental, neurological, neurodegenerative, and psychiatric populations. Formal and computational approaches to pragmatics are also very welcome. Deadline for submission: December 10, 2023. Looking f
LINGUIST List 34.2997 Calls: Theoretical and Experimental Pragmatics (Th-XPRAG) Workshop
linguistlist.org
To view or add a comment, sign in
-
Our language and cognition have an interesting history. Relationships have been built between the words we use and the thoughts that come with it. Most of the narrative surrounding medicine since the beginning of time has been associated with a belief of "fixing" an ailment. As we move forward with new knowledge and working towards management, it doesn't come as easily due to the strong relationships that are internally held with the medical language used. So what do we do from here? How do we move forward. One suggestion is to establish new relationships with more foreign words that don't already come with a history of medicalized thoughts surrounding them. Not only is it important to develop this language for clinicians, but we must also have a way of translating it for our clients while ensuring the content of the message doesn't get lost. Despite the empirical nature of relational frame theory, reading this book and taking a deep dive into a historical sense of how language and cognition has influenced behavior has taught me more about how to educate my clients than any pain neuroscience or motivational interviewing course ever has been able to do. So while I agree with my colleagues who get frustrated with the development of using new words, it seems to be more practical rather than trying to shake up the relationships between the medicalized language and their associated beliefs that has been observed over the years. Think of this way - not many people knew what a macchiato was until Starbucks kept popping up all over the place.
To view or add a comment, sign in
4,869 followers