Dunzo's financials are in the news. They made a loss of INR 1,800 Cr at a revenue of 226 Cr. But Dunzo always had a thing for extraordinary financial performance. Here's a YoY recall:
Year: Revenue / Loss
FY18: 15 Lakh / 22 Cr
FY19: 77 Lakh / 169 Cr
FY20: 27 Cr / 338 Cr
FY21: 25 Cr / 229 Cr
FY22: 54.3 Cr / 460 Cr
FY23: 226 Cr / 1800 Cr
Despite that performance, Dunzo managed to raise about $500 MILLION DOLLARS (INR 4000 Crores) in 19 funding rounds. Nineteen! Here are some of the investors who built this thing:
Lightrock Capital & Blume Ventures (the early champions). Later joined in by Google Ventures, Kalpvriksh Fund, Belltower Fund Group, Lightbox VC, STIC Investments, 3L Capital, and finally - Reliance Capital.
Now I always say how VCs talk big words like "product market fit", "GTM", "long term vision", "critical mass", etc. They talk "escape velocity", "disruption", "competitive strategy", TAM, SAM, SOM, Om Namah Shivaay. But for now, let's focus on "product market fit".
What is PMF? According to a generic internet definition, "PMF describes a scenario in which a company’s target customers are buying, using, and telling others about the company’s product in numbers large enough to sustain growth and profitability".
Okay. So where was "PMF" for Dunzo? Was it in the first FY when it made a loss of 22 Cr at a revenue of 15 Lakhs? Or was it the fifth FY, when it made a loss of 460 Cr at a revenue of 54 Cr? When and where was it?
Short answer: It was never there.
If you're a bootstrapped founder without pedigree, and you go to any of these VCs, you'll probably hear that you're "too early" and "must show PMF".
You're pre-product? Too early
Pre-revenue? Too early
Post revenue? Too early (because revenues are small)
Post substantial revenues (in the range of 1 - 2 Cr)? Too early (because earnings aren't there yet, or maybe "growth" looks hard).
The only time you'll actually be eligible for any funding from these VCs is when you're so green that you don't need it at all. Yet at the same time, you'll see bullshit companies getting picked up pre-product by these same people. That's how the ecosystem usually works, exceptions aside. But why?
Because these guys are busy funding their "friends". A fund like Lightspeed invests in companies like Magicpin and Frontrow which never made money (and probably never will). Why? Because the founders were ex-Lightspeed. That's a very blatant example, but not a solitary one. VCs claim (and pretend) to be all "meritocratic", but are actually driven mostly by relationships in their network.
I can understand. If I were investing my personal money, I'd also put it in my friend's business, even if there are better opportunities outside. But then I won't pretend to be all "meritocratic" about it. I won't throw around jargon to justify my bullshit investments and sound "intellectual". That's not cool, you know...
P.S. I'm building Seneca (https://bit.ly/3P70mFr). Join our WAITLIST: https://lnkd.in/d--_9q-J.
Marketing @ Anrok
4mo🎉 🎉 🎉