Rugged Robotics’ Post

AI is always helpful when you use it in the right way.

What if you could deploy a tireless, vigilant worker for your facility’s safety and maintenance? 👀 Keyper is not just a robot; it's a game-changer for industrial facilities. Capable of navigating complex environments autonomously, Keyper conducts thorough patrols and inspections, ensuring all safety protocols are met and operational efficiency is maximised. 🛠️📡 Contact us for a demo and explore how Keyper can benefit your facility 👉 https://bit.ly/43DZQnk #AutonomousRobotics #FacilityManagement #IndustrialSafety #SmartTechnology #RobotDog #ChemicalIndustry

Here are some safety devices to consider in robot cell to prevent accidents “Safety first “ just decide to be part of it

Why is simply considering the sensitivity of a safety function insufficient to assess the level of safety provided? The post The dual aspects of robot safety appeared first on The Robot Report. https://lnkd.in/gP-P4y3v

This is example how you can eliminate H&S risk related to work on the height from scaffolding. Gecko Robotics, Inc. robots can do the job with NDT inspection in another way. Faster Cheaper More safe If possible eliminate risk not only reduce! Siemens Energy & Gecko Robotics, Inc. strategic partnership. #innovation

Easily and quickly inspect underneath your heavy equipment and vehicles in HD without having to crawl underneath them. What them in action at https://hubs.la/Q02DbwrH0

High sensitivity is often touted as a benefit in robot safety, but it can sometimes be a disadvantage. When we talk about sensitivity, the amount of force it takes to get a robot to stop, we also need to talk about reliability, the likelihood that the stop function works as it should. An ultra-sensitive robot may face a lot of 'nuisance stops' caused by minor disturbances like a loose cable or an accidental touch. Nuisance stops in itself isn’t really a safety problem, but they kill productivity and can annoy users enough to bypass or disable the safety function altogether. Generally speaking, a well-designed safety function should strike a balance - it should be sensitive enough to ensure safety but not so sensitive that it encourages workers to circumvent it. The very best safety functions are the ones which keep you safe, without you ever noticing. Read the linked article if you’re interested in a more detailed, technical discussion on sensitivity and safety 👇

Working at heights on scaffolding is not only expensive but extremely dangerous. Unfortunately, scaffolding-related issues occur far too often. Instead, facilities can improve safety by leaving the hazardous work to the robots. Learn more: https://hubs.ly/Q01-M9f00 #safety #roboticinspections #SafeAndSoundAtWork

Incorporating material handling robots into your facility can improve throughput, streamline processes, reduce manual equipment requirements, improve safety, and eliminate operator injury. Learn more about these robots by watching our video:  https://lnkd.in/eMu9FMVN

High sensitivity is often touted as a benefit in robot safety, but it can sometimes be a disadvantage. When we talk about sensitivity, the amount of force it takes to get a robot to stop, we also need to talk about reliability, the likelihood that the stop function works as it should. An ultra-sensitive robot may face a lot of 'nuisance stops' caused by minor disturbances like a loose cable or an accidental touch. Nuisance stops in itself isn’t really a safety problem, but they kill productivity and can annoy users enough to bypass or disable the safety function altogether. Generally speaking, a well-designed safety function should strike a balance - it should be sensitive enough to ensure safety but not so sensitive that it encourages workers to circumvent it. The very best safety functions are the ones which keep you safe, without you ever noticing. Read the linked article if you’re interested in a more detailed, technical discussion on sensitivity and safety 👇