Congratulations to our team members who recently gained admission to law school! We are so proud of you all. #RubensteinLaw #PersonalInjury #LawFirm
Rubenstein Law’s Post
More Relevant Posts
-
He’s completed his first two years of law school and is joining us for the summer! Help us welcome Seth Earle to the Leading Law team. 👏🏻😁 #leadinglaw #frederictonlawyers #frederictonlegalteam #familylawfredericton #personalinjurylaw
To view or add a comment, sign in
-
-
And just like that, my first semester of law school is in the books! #LawSchool #LawStudent #TMSL #ThurgoodMarshallSchoolofLaw
To view or add a comment, sign in
-
-
Researcher, Developer, Farmer, and part-time Writer | In English & Persian | Interested in Private Law, Aviation, Economics, Politics & Intl' Rel., History, AI, and Finance
The recent UK Supreme Court judgment in [2023] UKSC 42 tackled the complex question of whether the government's policy of removing certain asylum seekers to Rwanda for offshore processing of their claims passes legal muster. While the Court confined its ruling to deficiencies in the Rwandan asylum apparatus specifically, its reasoning raises deeper questions about the legal and ethical implications of extra-territorial asylum processing overall. On one hand, the Court pointedly did not deem the policy unlawful per se, fixating on procedural flaws in Rwanda instead. This technically leaves open the possibility of lawful offshoring of asylum claims pending a rights-compliant destination. However, the Court’s extensive citing of established protections for asylum seekers signals indirect skepticism about externalizing asylum obligations. Though reaching a pragmatic conclusion, the underlying legal principles cited constrain offshoring policies considerably. Additionally, while Rwanda's rights deficits proved dispositive presently, the broader enterprise of shifting refugees and their complex claims abroad risks stretching legal principles of non-refoulement and due process thinner in the future. however judiciously applied. The Court’s carefully circumscribed ruling belies the instability of using fraught third countries to theoretically render policies lawful that struggle to pass ethical muster. Though not pronounced unlawful outright, the overarching policy still warrants searching legal and moral scrutiny going forward. In summary, while pragmatism prevailed in rejecting Rwanda specifically on procedural grounds, the Court’s jurisprudential commitments indicate that extra-territorial asylum policies likely conflict with core legal safeguards for refugees’ rights in ways [2023] UKSC 42 avoided explicitly declaring but cannot fully resolve. The principles undergirding the Court’s reasoning suggest deeper unlawfulness may persist irrespective of destination. Therefore, I argue that the Court relied more on pragmatic considerations rather than sticking to sound legal principles in its judgment. While the judges confined their ruling to issues with Rwanda specifically, they opened the door to potentially allowing the overall policy of offshore asylum processing if done correctly. However, you could contend that such a policy still conflicts with domestic and international legal protections for asylum seekers, as well as ethical obligations. #LegalPragmatism #Law #HumanRights
Presenting on legal pragmatism at UC Davis Law School with my amazing colleagues! 📚 Our group's dedication and teamwork paid off as we were selected as the best and first group. 🏆 #LegalPragmatism #UCDavisLaw
To view or add a comment, sign in
-
-
Thinking About Law School? Part 1 of our series dives into the factors to consider when deciding if law school is the right path for you. 🎓⚖️ #LawSchoolJourney #LegalEducation
To view or add a comment, sign in
-
Are you considering law school but wondering if it's worth the investment? As you think through all the details, be sure to give Regent Law School a look. We were recently ranked #12 on Best Value for Private Law Schools. Check out more here https://buff.ly/45AhkR9. . #RegentLaw #Regent
To view or add a comment, sign in
-
-
Can anyone help me with the process of reflecting the name of a law firm in a court case. For example, I have a law firm by the name 'Sharma Law firm' , wherein there are 2 lawyers as partners. Now, i want to reflect the name of my Law firm in the court record in every case filed by my firm. How to do that? A humble explanation would be appreciated.
To view or add a comment, sign in
-
Thinking about law school? About to start 1L year? Check out this video where I debunk two common myths about law school! Myth #1: You should ONLY go to law school if you know you want to be a lawyer. Myth #2: Everybody HATES the first year of law school. https://lnkd.in/gvggK3GW
DEBUNKING TWO MYTHS ABOUT LAW SCHOOL
https://www.youtube.com/
To view or add a comment, sign in
-
We are pleased to announce that our partners, Agus D. Prasetyo and Sri Hartini, have been featured in the Hall of Fame on an exclusive list of law firm partners from top law schools by Hukumonline. #ADPCounsellorsatLaw #TheBestLegalServiceToNavigateYourLegalBusiness
To view or add a comment, sign in
-
-
Prepare yourself for a successful first year of law school with Hofstra Law's pre-law program Edge Ahead! Join us for our virtual info session on June 6, 2024, at noon to learn more. RSVP: https://lnkd.in/e8U6NhSr #lawschool #prelaw
To view or add a comment, sign in
-
-
Law Professor at JFK School of Law at National University; Author of 1000 Days to the Bar - But the Practice of Law Begins Now! #LawSchoolSuccess #LegalEducation #Pre-Law #LawSchool #Pre-Law
Why practice law? Click the link, then scroll to the button labeled "Remember why you are in law school." https://lnkd.in/e6r_8Xt7 #LawStudent #LawStudents #PreLaw #LegalEducation #lawschool
To view or add a comment, sign in