The United States has spent two years supporting Ukraine in one ground war and seven months backing Israel in another, and it continues to prepare for the possibility of a third in Taiwan. But arguably its most persistent focus has been on a far longer-running, more perennial, borderless battle over cyberspace and the future of technology.The State Department unveiled its own piece of that ever-expanding policy priority this week with the release of its International Cyberspace and Digital Strategy, which lays out a doctrine of “digital solidarity” that emphasizes the role of technology in diplomacy and the need to build international coalitions to uphold an “open, inclusive, secure, and resilient” internet through “responsible state behavior” in cyberspace. The strategy document, unveiled on Monday, sits at the intersection of three hallmarks of the Biden administration’s first term: an escalating conflict with adversaries such as Russia and China that frequently plays out in the cyber realm; an emphasis on “minilateralism” by building international coalitions and partnerships among smaller, targeted groupings; and a determination to maintain the United States’ global technological primacy. “Today’s revolutions in technology are at the heart of our competition with geopolitical rivals,” U.S. Secretary of State Antony Blinken said while announcing the strategy at the RSA Conference in San Francisco, which is Silicon Valley’s biggest annual gathering of cybersecurity professionals. “Our ability to design, to develop, to deploy technologies will determine our capacity to shape the tech future, and naturally, operating from a position of strength better positions us to set standards and advance norms around the world,” Blinken added. “But our advantage comes not just from our domestic strength. It comes from our solidarity with the majority of the world that shares our vision for a vibrant, open, and secure technological future, and from an unmatched network of allies and partners with whom we can work in common cause.” Speaking to reporters just minutes after that speech, Nathaniel Fick, the U.S. ambassador at large for cyberspace and digital policy, outlined the importance of those global partnerships in setting broader norms and collectively calling out contraventions by the likes of Russia and China. “It’s easy to pick on one kid at the playground. It’s harder to pick on 30 kids,” he said. “So building durable coalitions in these attributions matters.” https://lnkd.in/g6JxMzEG
Richard Staynings’ Post
More Relevant Posts
-
Tech Diplomacy, trusted technology, and a secure digital ecosystem are vital to our national security, our economy, and our daily lives. The release of the United States' International Cyberspace and Digital Policy Strategy presents a great opportunity to familiarize yourself with America's current technology and diplomatic objectives. It also offers a deeper understanding of how our leaders are shaping our domestic and international technology landscape. Building Digital Solidarity: Bureau of Cyberspace and Digital Policy Strategy: https://lnkd.in/ek6UaEWj
Building Digital Solidarity: The United States International Cyberspace & Digital Policy Strategy - United States Department of State
https://www.state.gov
To view or add a comment, sign in
-
🌐 Interested in global digital policy strategies? Dive into the United States International Cyberspace & Digital Policy Strategy at https://lnkd.in/ek6UaEWj. 💡 The strategy is all about Building Digital Solidarity, emphasizing the importance of working together to create a secure and rights-respecting digital future. 🔍 Check out some key highlights: - Three guiding principles: - An affirmative vision for a secure cyberspace. - Integration of cybersecurity with sustainable development. - Comprehensive policy approach using diplomacy tools. - Four areas of action: - Promote an open and resilient digital ecosystem. - Advance responsible state behavior in cyberspace. - Strengthen international partner digital capacity. 💬 U.S. Secretary of State emphasized, "We will work with countries committed to open, safe, and secure technology promoting inclusive growth." Ready to explore how digital solidarity shapes our future? Click the link for more detailed insights! #DigitalSolidarity #CyberPolicy #GlobalTechPolicy #BuildingSolidarity #OnlineSecurity #InnovativeFuture
To view or add a comment, sign in
-
-
🌐 Interested in global digital policy strategies? Dive into the United States International Cyberspace & Digital Policy Strategy at https://lnkd.in/ek6UaEWj. 💡 The strategy is all about Building Digital Solidarity, emphasizing the importance of working together to create a secure and rights-respecting digital future. 🔍 Check out some key highlights: - Three guiding principles: - An affirmative vision for a secure cyberspace. - Integration of cybersecurity with sustainable development. - Comprehensive policy approach using diplomacy tools. - Four areas of action: - Promote an open and resilient digital ecosystem. - Advance responsible state behavior in cyberspace. - Strengthen international partner digital capacity. 💬 U.S. Secretary of State emphasized, "We will work with countries committed to open, safe, and secure technology promoting inclusive growth." Ready to explore how digital solidarity shapes our future? Click the link for more detailed insights! #DigitalSolidarity #CyberPolicy #GlobalTechPolicy #BuildingSolidarity #OnlineSecurity #InnovativeFuture
To view or add a comment, sign in
-
-
Next Generation Perspectives on Taiwan: Insights from the 2023 Taiwan-US Policy Program Security and Geopolitics ... China is more likely to succeed in that endeavor if Taiwan becomes isolated from the rest of the world. More Info. https://lnkd.in/dqZTqFEV #geopolitics#TheAsiaHawk
Next Generation Perspectives on Taiwan: Insights from the 2023 Taiwan-US Policy Program
gmfus.org
To view or add a comment, sign in
-
In a significant shift, Lithuania has reevaluated its stance on China, moving from seeing it as a lucrative market to recognizing it as a multifaceted systemic threat. Elzė Pinelytė explores this transition in Lithuania's national security outlook. Key insights 1️⃣ Evolving Threat Perceptions: Since 2019, Lithuania's national security assessments have increasingly identified China as a systemic threat, marking a notable shift from its earlier, more nuanced view of China as primarily an economic partner. 2️⃣ Strategic Rivalries: The deepening Sino-Russian partnership, especially in light of events in Ukraine, alongside China's increased activities in Europe, has led Lithuania to reassess the security challenges posed by Beijing. 3️⃣ Intelligence Concerns: Lithuania has grown increasingly vigilant of China's cyber espionage activities and the operations of Chinese intelligence and security services 4️⃣ Bilateral Relations: There has been a downturn in bilateral relations between Lithuania and China, significantly influenced by Lithuania's firm stance on human rights issues and its measures to limit Huawei's participation in developing its 5G infrastructure. https://lnkd.in/e5Qwnfjw
Revisiting Threat Perceptions of China: A Perspective from Lithuania
https://chinaobservers.eu
To view or add a comment, sign in
-
At this stage one needs to begin to analyze what status quo means for the 3 parties. ______________ The United States should not end nearly half a century of unofficial relations with Taiwan to instead recognize the self-governing island as its own country, a senior U.S. diplomat told Congress on Tuesday. Taiwan is claimed by China as an inalienable part of its territory, but is governed independently of Beijing with the close support of the United States, with which the democratic island holds “unofficial ties.” Since January 1979, Washington has said Taipei and Beijing need to resolve their differences without conflict, and that the “status quo” of how Taiwan is governed should continue unchanged until then. Speaking to a Senate subcommittee on Tuesday, Daniel Kritenbrink, the assistant U.S. secretary of state for East Asian and Pacific affairs, said nothing would be gained by shifting that position now to instead recognize Taiwan as an independent country separate from China. “That framework has stood the test of time for the last 45 years,” Kritenbrink said in his testimony to the Senate Subcommittee on East Asia, The Pacific, and International Cybersecurity Policy. He said it was more “practical” to focus on “tangible means to build Taiwan’s deterrent capabilities” to ward off an invasion by China. “We have preserved peace and stability across the Taiwan Strait,” he said. “We believe that changing that framework, changing … the core elements of the U.S. ‘One China’ policy would be unwise – and rather than contributing to stability, we believe it would undermine it.” “It's important that the United States and our allies and partners continue to be the parties that stand for the status quo, that stand for the responsible maintenance of the status quo,” he added. https://lnkd.in/gx3BErRC
US diplomat: Official ties to Taiwan would ‘undermine’ peace
rfa.org
To view or add a comment, sign in
-
https://lnkd.in/dX4UbjFt Europe's Security Role in the Indo-Pacific: Making It Meaningful U.S. engagement toward Europe has been effective in highlighting the growing economic challenge posed by China in the Indo-Pacific region and beyond. But what security role should Washington seek from its European allies in the region? Report by Max Bergmann and Christopher B. Johnstone — June 26, 2024 U.S. engagement has been effective in aligning European perspectives and approaches to the Indo-Pacific and beyond. Although the shift is uneven across European capitals, the rising economic challenge posed by China is now a major focus of transatlantic discussions. However, the picture is less clear on defense and security issues, with little consensus or focus from Washington on how Europe should deepen its engagement with countries in the Indo-Pacific. This picture of unfocused engagement and occasional mixed messages begs the question: What security role should the United States seek for Europe in the Indo-Pacific? Can European partners make a meaningful contribution to deterrence and contingency response in the region, and if so, how? This report finds that Europe has a significant interest in upholding a free and open Indo-Pacific and can contribute to regional security in targeted ways. The deepening cooperation and engagement between Moscow and Beijing underscores that security in Europe and the Indo-Pacific are linked—thus, a deeper European role in Indo-Pacific security would be a welcome development and should be encouraged by Washington. Yet, Europe’s role in the region in the near term is constrained by its limited military means and by the direct and intensifying challenge posed by Russia. Europe’s priority should therefore be to ensure its own security in the face of the Russian threat, and to build the capacity to enable the United States to shift focus and respond effectively in the event of a military contingency or crisis with China.
To view or add a comment, sign in
-
Next Generation Perspectives on Taiwan: Insights from the 2023 Taiwan-US Policy Program Security and Geopolitics ... China is more likely to succeed in that endeavor if Taiwan becomes isolated from the rest of the world. More Info. https://lnkd.in/dqZTqFEV #geopolitics#TheAsiaHawk
Next Generation Perspectives on Taiwan: Insights from the 2023 Taiwan-US Policy Program
gmfus.org
To view or add a comment, sign in
-
🌐 Interested in global digital policy strategies? Dive into the United States International Cyberspace & Digital Policy Strategy at https://lnkd.in/ezG9fr8p. 💡 The strategy is all about Building Digital Solidarity, emphasizing the importance of working together to create a secure and rights-respecting digital future. 🔍 Check out some key highlights: - Three guiding principles: - An affirmative vision for a secure cyberspace. - Integration of cybersecurity with sustainable development. - Comprehensive policy approach using diplomacy tools. - Four areas of action: - Promote an open and resilient digital ecosystem. - Advance responsible state behavior in cyberspace. - Strengthen international partner digital capacity. 💬 U.S. Secretary of State emphasized, "We will work with countries committed to open, safe, and secure technology promoting inclusive growth." Ready to explore how digital solidarity shapes our future? Click the link for more detailed insights! #DigitalSolidarity #CyberPolicy #GlobalTechPolicy #BuildingSolidarity #OnlineSecurity #InnovativeFuture
To view or add a comment, sign in
-
-
On April 8, 2024, the United States, United Kingdom, and Australia, key partners in the AUKUS security pact, announced they are contemplating the inclusion of Japan in their collective efforts to enhance security measures and technological advancements within the Indo-Pacific region. This move aims to counteract the increasing influence of China in the area. The discussion around Japan’s potential involvement, particularly in projects related to "Pillar II" of AUKUS which focuses on advanced capabilities and technology sharing, is set to be a topic during a summit between U.S. President Joe Biden and Japanese Prime Minister Fumio Kishida in Washington. While the initiative acknowledges Japan’s technological and defense capabilities, challenges arise due to U.S. export-control restrictions and the necessity for Japan to improve cyber defenses and enforce stricter secrecy measures. AUKUS, established in 2021 to address China’s growing regional dominance, initially aimed to deliver nuclear-powered submarines to Australia under its first phase. The second phase, however, concentrates on sharing cutting-edge technologies across various domains, including quantum computing and artificial intelligence, highlighting the potential collaboration with Japan. Despite these developments, concerns regarding the feasibility of such cooperation persist, particularly considering existing limitations on technological sharing with AUKUS nations and Japan’s current security and data protection frameworks. Senior officials emphasise the importance of Japan enhancing its intellectual property protections and cybersecurity measures to facilitate this strategic partnership. Source: https://lnkd.in/gg3vtXa5 #AUKUS #IndoPacificSecurity #USUKAustraliaJapan #TechnologicalCollaboration #GlobalDiplomacy
US, UK, Australia consider Japan's cooperation in AUKUS security pact
reuters.com
To view or add a comment, sign in
I passed the Securities Industry Essentials exam! I'm #OpenToWork in the finance industry!
3moRichard Staynings As I see it, the problem is twofold: 1) policymakers (elected and appointed alike) are bought off by various corporate interests, and 2) most of them have zero knowledge of technology or science. Ignorance of science and technology is a bipartisan problem. "We are now confronted with the disheartening spectacle of lawyers attempting to draw up laws on the subject of atomic physics. They look to the past for precedents; there are no precedents -- and their own esoteric professional training does not require that they be exposed in any fashion to science or the methods of science," warned Robert Heinlein in 1946 in his amazing book, Take Back Your Government: https://www.booksamillion.com/p/Take-Back-Your-Government/Robert-A-Heinlein/9781612420615?id=9152763794098 Sadly, that part of Washington D.C. has not changed since 1946.