Courts in California will be closed on Wednesday June 19th for Juneteenth. #IntellicheckwithAccuracy #CAcourtHoliday
Reliance Intellicheck Solutions’ Post
More Relevant Posts
-
The Family Courts in England and Wales are not fit for purpose. In this article I discuss some of the key concerns and Resolution's proposals for reform. #familylaw #familylawyers #courtreform
To view or add a comment, sign in
-
24 model courts in 16 cities across the Kingdom; to implement institutional justice in the courts and meet the needs of litigants. #SaudiVision2030
To view or add a comment, sign in
-
-
From time to time we are asked to disclose lower courts in California as most states in the country have additional courts in each county aside from the main Superior Court. Fortunately, In 1998 California voters passed a constitutional amendment that provided for voluntary unification of the superior and municipal courts in each county into a single, countywide trial court system. By January 2001, all 58 California counties had voted to unify their municipal and superior court operations. Let us know if you need any help with your California research!! #IntellicheckwithAccuracy #CourtUnification #CaResearchDoneRight
To view or add a comment, sign in
-
Human Rights Activist, Mental Health Advocate, Victor in waiting. Founder and chief executive officer of Ponsonby Chambers
SAW THIS ANNUAL REPORT but what I can't see: 1. THE "associate judges" - ROLLED THROUGH IN A BILL BY KIRRI ALLAN IN MARCH 2023 [still unnamed and apparently not appointed] https://lnkd.in/gN6X7Hrq "The Family Court (Family Court Associates) Legislation Bill will establish a new role known as the Family Court Associate. " 2. Also can't locate the letters of approval from the relevant head judges and supreme court for copious judges to hold office? Anyone else? 142 Judge not to undertake other employment or hold other office (1) A Judge or an Associate Judge must not undertake any other paid employment or hold any other office (whether paid or not) without the approval of the Chief Justice in consultation (in the case of an Associate Judge, a High Court Judge, or a Court of Appeal Judge) with the appropriate head of court. (2) An approval under subsection (1) may only be given if the appropriate head of court is satisfied that undertaking the employment or holding the office is consistent with the Judge’s judicial office. (3) However, subsection (1) does not apply to another office if an enactment permits or requires the office to be held by a Judge. (4) In this section, appropriate head of court means— (a) the President of the Court of Appeal, if the Judge is a Court of Appeal Judge: (b) the Chief High Court Judge, if— (i) the Judge is a High Court Judge but not a Court of Appeal Judge; or (ii) the Judge is an Associate Judge. Compare: 1908 No 89 ss 4(2A), 26C(5) https://lnkd.in/gqTB49_P
Chief Justice Helen Winkelmann has today released a report on the operation of the courts during 2022. https://lnkd.in/gAZdPWTw #courtsofnz #chiefjustice #annualreport
To view or add a comment, sign in
-
-
The Utah Supreme Court just weighed in on an issue that was litigated in the district court for years. The court explained that the plain language of the Utah Constitution gives the district court discretion to set bail when there is an alleged “double felony defendant,” i.e. when the defendant gets charged with a felony while on probation for another felony. That is because in almost every circumstance, bail is guaranteed under the Utah Constitution. But under three circumstances--those outlined in Utah Constitution article 1, section (8)--bail is not guaranteed. Instead, the district court has discretion to set bail or not when those circumstances are in play. Constitutional interpretation tip: Because the bail provision was amended in 1988, to reach this conclusion, the Utah Supreme Court looked to the 1988 voter information pamphlet to determine the "original public meaning" of the plain language. #appellatelinkedin #appeals #criminaldefense #lawyers #lawstudents The Appellate Group
State v. Barnett
https://theappellategroup.com
To view or add a comment, sign in
-
Relying on Evidence in Admissible Form to Support or Opposition to a Summary Judgment The New York Appellate Division, Second Judicial Department states that the defendants would have defeated summary judgment in a motor-vehicle accident had they submitted the police report in admissible form. The defendants proffered an uncertified police report in opposition to a summary judgment motion and did not provide an acceptable excuse for failing to submit the report in admissible form. https://lnkd.in/eHNYNfTb #nycivillaw #gckblaw #nylaw #nylawyer #autoaccidents #autoinjury #personalinjury #personalinjurylawyer #personalinjuryattorney #personalinjurylaw #appeals #appellatelaw #appellate #appellatelinkedin
To view or add a comment, sign in
-
-
Full federal court coverage … you got it. Protect your client’s risk and gain extra points in your #duediligence efforts with Lexis® CourtLink®. Dominate the courts.
Full federal court coverage … you got it. Protect your client’s risk and gain extra points in your #duediligence efforts with Lexis® CourtLink®.
To view or add a comment, sign in
-
Full federal court coverage … you got it. Protect your client’s risk and gain extra points in your #duediligence efforts with Lexis® CourtLink®. Dominate the courts.
Full federal court coverage … you got it. Protect your client’s risk and gain extra points in your #duediligence efforts with Lexis® CourtLink®.
To view or add a comment, sign in
-
2024 is almost here! What are your goals for your court or department? 🤔 Comment Below! #ezJustice #NewYears #2024 #LawEnforcement
To view or add a comment, sign in
-
-
2024 is almost here! What are your goals for your court or department? 🤔 Comment Below! #ezJustice #NewYears #2024 #LawEnforcement
To view or add a comment, sign in
-