Reginald J. Williams’ Post

View profile for Reginald J. Williams, graphic
Reginald J. Williams Reginald J. Williams is an Influencer

Head of Tech Talent, Advisor, Linkedin Top Voice

So you've hired your first recruiter... Now how do you measure impact? It's great when you see startups invest in internal recruiting resources early however it's tricky to figure out what metrics to use to evaluate performance. With a team of 1, not only do you lack historical performance data but you also can't leverage relative performance indicators so it's important to back into some goals based on industry benchmarks while also keeping in mind all the factors involved. Here are a few starting metrics to start tracking once you are building a recruiting team. These will also scale as you grow out the org: Volume by channel: - Raw number of people that are coming in from the recruiting channels that they own. This would be split out into outbound sourcing, applicants, and referrals. - More "credit" is often given to outbound sourcing since this requires the most work on their end but going through a large number of applicants is time consuming so you want to think about how many "qualified" people are they getting overall through all the different channels. - Usually you want to look at how many technical screens are being set up for the hiring manager per week with the goal likely being about 1 technical screen a day to ensure a healthy pipeline (this is just a target based on benchmark passthrough rates). - You can also set onsite goals per week for the team as a way to measure momentum. Efficiency/Passthrough: - Volume is great, but only if the candidates meet your hiring bar at a rate that is efficient. - You want to track how many people that the recruiter submits for a technical phone screen are making it to later rounds of interviews. - Tracking rejection reasons are important in order to diagnose why people are falling out at each stage and ways that you can get better signal on these things earlier in the process. Speed: - Many companies look at recruiting performance as "time to fill". So the date that the role is kicked off with the recruiter until the date someone has signed an offer (some companies will use the start date instead). A role typically takes around 2 months to fill from kick off for an IC position but this can vary depending on the difficulty of the role and stage of the company. - I like to look at "time in stage" that candidates spend in the process as well. So how long does it take someone to go from phone screen to each stage of interviews thereafter. This is obviously not indicative of recruiter performance necessarily but it does give you a sense of any bottlenecks in the process and can act as a red flag for something broken in the process or maybe there is a lack of urgency in how the candidates are being moved forward. I would also encourage founders to actually talk to candidates (even those who didn't receive an offer) about their experience directly. These anecdotes can give amazing color to the numbers. #recruiting #hiring #techrecruiting #techhiring

  • No alternative text description for this image
Steve Bartel

Founder & CEO of Gem ($150M Accel, Greylock, ICONIQ, Sapphire, Meritech, YC) | Author of startuphiring101.com

3w

Nice! Huge fan of benchmarks, which are always valuable IMO. Especially when you don't have historical data to compare against. e.g., for a small startup hiring their first recruiter as you called out. We have some of this data (open rate, reply rate, pass-thru rates, time to hire, etc.) broken out by company size in our annual benchmark report. It doesn't get as specific as what to expect from your first recruiter but might be helpful directionally. Some of the data for the smallest company range matches what you're sharing. Figured I'd share in case it's helpful in rounding out a few more metrics! :) https://www.gem.com/resource/2023-Recruiting-Benchmarks?utm_medium=social&utm_source=linkedin&utm_campaign=sb

Jeffrey Keith, SHRM-CP

Global HR Leader @ Global Fishing Watch

3w

I don't like punishing recruiters based on where the hire comes from or even measuring their sourcing stats. If quality hires are being made in a timely fashion purely through apps, then what problem does this solve? (not saying you are promoting doing this but many companies do). If we do have a quality of hire or time to hire issue, then it's time to drill down and expand the metrics to include sourcing channel/outreach/etc. Now if we can just figure out and agree on a great way to measure QOH! I'd love to hear your thoughts on the best way to measure QOH Reginald J. Williams 😄

Lauren Brownstone

Behavior Change Consultant helping businesses scale rapidly and grow revenue | Fractional Chief Learning Officer | Click the link below to book a 1-on-1 Game Plan Session

3w

This is fabulous. I especially like your comments on efficiency - "Tracking rejection reasons are important in order to diagnose why people are falling out at each stage and ways that you can get better signal on these things earlier in the process." - This can also become very useful in a look-back on hires that didn't work out.

Jordan Diggs

Director, Global Talent Acquisition @ Beyond Limits | Graziadio Business School MBA Candidate

3w

This is amazing info. Greenhouse actually has a an amazing prebuilt report for this and the pass through rate is my absolute go to. The second thing I look at is time in each stage. Especially early on, we can make decisions and move on. My team has goals built around the different pass through places so that we can be efficient.

Shannon Atkinson

Experienced Automation & DevOps Engineer | Expert in Automation, CI/CD, Cloud Technologies & System Architecture | Jenkins & CircleCI Certified | Ardent about Scalable Solutions and Agile Practices

3w

Building a recruiting team is a big step. Tracking those key metrics sounds like a solid plan.

Natan 🌱 Fisher

Startup Investor & Cofounder at SingleSprout | 1,000+ Hires | We Build Winning Startup and Legal Teams | Follow for Insights

3w

Gold.

David Barwick

SR Tech Headhunter/ Talent Advisor

3w

Great list! I think adding a component of how long candidates stay in submittal review is helpful to gather a clwar picture of “where did all the time for?!”

Ed Boyes

Sr. Recruiter | Coach | Advisor l AI Technology

3w

Thanks for sharing! I will start using this more!!

mawulom N.

Recruiting || Human Capital Startup Advisor || Keynote Speaker || Belonging Advocate

2w

#datadriven

See more comments

To view or add a comment, sign in

Explore topics