Rachel Huff’s Post

View profile for Rachel Huff, graphic

Brand-agency relationship builder. Communications strategist.

Communications and PR teams have always faced challenges connecting their work to the company’s bottom line. It’s one of the reasons we’ve unfortunately seen in-house teams and budgets get cut. I recently joined a PR Council webinar on this very topic featuring Johna Burke from AMEC Measurement and Evaluation. Here are a few themes that came up: 🙄 There's a lot of navel-gazing and "grading our own homework." Evaluating efforts only at the end of a campaign (often just to pat ourselves on the back) disconnects us from real outcomes. Establishing short- and long-term impacts early on ensures clear attribution of success. 🙄 Beware of dashboards that serve YOUR needs. Everyone loves a fancy dashboard (Johna called this "dashboard-itis"). But you must show how efforts impact the brand. It’s about outcomes and impacts, not just pretty visuals. 🙄 "An impression doesn't mean anyone was impressed." Your billions of impressions (really?!) mean nothing if they don’t change minds, hearts, and beliefs. It’s the impact on your target audience that truly counts. 🙄 FOFO aka "Fear of Finding Out." The idea that we avoid improving our measurement practices because we subconsciously fear the results. As Kim Sample noted, we DO want to know the impact of PR and comms efforts, but often lack the know-how (and I’ll add: the resources) to measure these accurately. These themes echoed the conversations I’ve been having with communications leaders at both brands and agencies. Many are ready to move from discussing measurement challenges to actually implementing better solutions. Sales pitches aside, please comment below with any resources or tools that are working for you!

Jesse Granger

Communications Leader | Storyteller | Data/Analytics Nerd | Veteran | Dad ... ex Army, Ogilvy, Comcast

1mo

Effective comms measurement and evaluation programs are different wherever you look because they’re based on the goals of organizations that have different challenges and aims. In my last role, I had success with measurement by implementing reputation research in partnership with the Harris Poll. As a new brand launching service to 18 new markets in 18 months, it was our challenge to raise awareness of our brand and increase customer advocacy and prospect consideration in a hyper competitive broadband service environment. The research findings on our and our competitors reputations identified where we could press advantages, shore up weaknesses and improve reputation to make gains in supporting behaviors we were aiming for like likelihood to consider switching service, likelihood to give the benefit of the doubt in the event of bad news, openness to expansion into their community, etc. It took a full company effort, but when we ran the research a year later, we’d seen a 30+% in brand awareness and 20+% uptick in customer advocacy, far outpacing our expectations. It’s not a one-size-fits all solution, but pairing research with goals that are measurable and achievable can be very impactful to business goals.

Sean T. Findlen

C-Suite Advisor | Communications & Positioning Strategist | Skilled Nonprofit Board Leader

1mo

For me, the operative question on assessment is "so what?" 1,000,000 views? So what? We can drown ourselves in data, indicators, etc. to self-soothe. But if they carry no relevance to underlying outcomes, it's all just noise to satisfy our inner selves, i.e., vanity metrics.

Geraldine O'Neill

Head of Marketing and Communications, Yoga Teacher

1mo

I think one of the issues for comms/PR is not thinking about reporting from the business’s perspective- what are the commercial/business outcomes we are trying to achieve and what are the comms channels/tactics that support this best? instead we see a social listening report ..lots of results ..a pr coverage report ..results ..a speaker appearance report …but none of it stitches together ..and not adding up to much from the perspective of the customer ..ultimately they want to know did this effort move the needle for us to get us to b? is this pr effort supporting us in some way ? PR tends to measure by effort because it’s hard and there’s a lot of heavy lifting but if we stepped back and said let’s focus on less, but really focus on tangible results ..I’d also say comms in the main does not align enough with marketing ..I have seen situations where ‘never the Twain shall meet’ this makes absolutely no sense as the combination of both functions is where the magic happens for the organisation.

David Burnand

Chief Marketing & Communications Officer at Staffbase, the 🌎’s leading Employee Communications Cloud, Intranet & Employee App

1mo

This! We think it’s time that this changed for internal and external communications, so we’re building the platform to connect the impact of communications to business outcomes https://staffbase.com/en/mission-control/. We’d love your thoughts on it.

I like FOFO. I'm going to use that. It's so true that some Comms folks don't want to be accountable to results but that is hurting us.

See more comments

To view or add a comment, sign in

Explore topics