Excellent piece of work on rCBDC adoption Carlos León and others https://lnkd.in/gQfR2rtd The researchers use an Agent Based Model (ABM) to simulate the actions of citizens in adopting a retail #CBDC with various configurations and various design options in (fairly) realistic situations (a 'digital twin') This approach is is completely different to those of #BIS, #ECB and Bank of England #BOE who write pieces of code and then declare victory - 'yes that works'! Interestingly, the study found "The reverse waterfall functionality (😉) and a positive remuneration spread (😉) are effective in fostering adoption; the distribution of government incentives via rCBDC is effective in fostering adoption and decreasing the use of cash; and balance limits and top-up limits are effective in restraining adoption (😉) ". Lots more work to do but adoption is critical for the success of any rCBDC Next stage, confirm results with behavioural economics studies on findings of ABM study (agents are not 'rational') #ECB pay attention!
It’s like going to a casino and changing your cash to plastic chips and the casino gives you a couple of them for free if you’re a good customer except that in the rCBDC case you won’t see your cash anymore ever
Management Consultant | Payments
3wbriefly had a look at the assumptions taken for consumer allocations (section 3.1.1). Personally I would set my holding limit to zero to use it similarly to my existing debit card (avoiding reverse waterfalled txns split across acct/wallet). Why should I do anything different?