Phillip Schreiber’s Post

Recent article written by Workman Nydegger Attorney Ryan Morris, published on @BloombergLaw, regarding the potential evolution of Chevron deference post-Supreme Court oral arguments. The potential overturning of Chevron deference could have significant implications that potentially could reshape the dynamics of statutory interpretation. Without Chevron deference, courts may no longer automatically defer to agency interpretations, leading to increased judicial scrutiny. This shift could introduce ambiguity and uncertainty in regulatory frameworks like the Clean Air Act, prompting a reevaluation of legal strategies and approaches. What’s your take on this matter? #SCOTUS #chevrondeference #bloomberglaw

Recent article written by Workman Nydegger Attorney Ryan Morris, published on @BloombergLaw, regarding the potential evolution of Chevron deference post-Supreme Court oral arguments. The potential overturning of Chevron deference could have significant implications that potentially could reshape the dynamics of statutory interpretation. Without Chevron deference, courts may no longer automatically defer to agency interpretations, leading to increased judicial scrutiny. This shift could introduce ambiguity and uncertainty in regulatory frameworks like the Clean Air Act, prompting a reevaluation of legal strategies and approaches. What’s your take on this matter? #SCOTUS #chevrondeference #bloomberglaw

Recent article written by Workman Nydegger Attorney Ryan Morris, published on @BloombergLaw, regarding the potential evolution of Chevron deference post-Supreme Court oral arguments. The potential overturning of Chevron deference could have significant implications that potentially could reshape the dynamics of statutory interpretation. Without Chevron deference, courts may no longer automatically defer to agency interpretations, leading to increased judicial scrutiny. This shift could introduce ambiguity and uncertainty in regulatory frameworks like the Clean Air Act, prompting a reevaluation of legal strategies and approaches. What’s your take on this matter? #SCOTUS #chevrondeference #bloomberglaw

Recent article written by Workman Nydegger Attorney Ryan Morris, published on @BloombergLaw, regarding the potential evolution of Chevron deference post-Supreme Court oral arguments. The potential overturning of Chevron deference could have significant implications that potentially could reshape the dynamics of statutory interpretation. Without Chevron deference, courts may no longer automatically defer to agency interpretations, leading to increased judicial scrutiny. This shift could introduce ambiguity and uncertainty in regulatory frameworks like the Clean Air Act, prompting a reevaluation of legal strategies and approaches. What’s your take on this matter? #SCOTUS #chevrondeference #bloomberglaw

Recent article written by Workman Nydegger Attorney Ryan Morris, published on @BloombergLaw, regarding the potential evolution of Chevron deference post-Supreme Court oral arguments. The potential overturning of Chevron deference could have significant implications that potentially could reshape the dynamics of statutory interpretation. Without Chevron deference, courts may no longer automatically defer to agency interpretations, leading to increased judicial scrutiny. This shift could introduce ambiguity and uncertainty in regulatory frameworks like the Clean Air Act, prompting a reevaluation of legal strategies and approaches. What’s your take on this matter? #SCOTUS #chevrondeference #bloomberglaw

Recent article written by Workman Nydegger Attorney Ryan Morris, published on @BloombergLaw, regarding the potential evolution of Chevron deference post-Supreme Court oral arguments. The potential overturning of Chevron deference could have significant implications that potentially could reshape the dynamics of statutory interpretation. Without Chevron deference, courts may no longer automatically defer to agency interpretations, leading to increased judicial scrutiny. This shift could introduce ambiguity and uncertainty in regulatory frameworks like the Clean Air Act, prompting a reevaluation of legal strategies and approaches. What’s your take on this matter? #SCOTUS #chevrondeference #bloomberglaw

BREAKING NEWS: Supreme Court Overturns Chevron Doctrine The Supreme Court overturned the Chevron doctrine, giving courts more power to challenge and overturn agency regulations. Judges must now use their own judgment to interpret laws, potentially making it easier to challenge regulations from the CFPB, FTC, and other agencies. The decision marks a significant shift in the balance of power between the judiciary and federal agencies, making the industry's regulatory framework more unpredictable. KEY IMPLICATIONS: - Regulations from various agencies will be more susceptible to legal challenges, and industry groups may have more success challenging unfavorable regulations in court. - The decision may make it harder for agencies to issue new regulations or enforce existing ones without explicit Congressional authorization, potentially requiring businesses to be more agile and proactive in their compliance and legal strategies.

READ: With Chevron Deference Gone, What’s an Agency to Do? https://lnkd.in/epe8ykfc "In a recent landmark decision, the Supreme Court struck down what is known as the Chevron decision, a 1984 case that basically gave federal agencies deference in how to interpret statutes that may be somewhat ambiguous or not completely clear." Click to Read More! #FDA #RegulatoryAffairs

Save the Date: Jan 18, 2024 - Post-SCOTUS Oral Argument Webinar On Jan 17, the Supreme Court will hear oral arguments in Loper Bright Enterprises v. Raimondo and Relentless, Inc. v. Department of Commerce. These cases are poised to reshape the landscape of federal regulatory agencies' powers and the implementation of statutes governing private industry. Key Discussion Points: 1. The Historical Evolution of the Chevron Doctrine 2. Questions Raised by Loper Bright and Relentless Cases 3. Insights from the Previous Day’s Oral Argument 4. Pragmatic Pointers on Future Implications Why Attend? The Loper Bright and Relentless cases carry significant weight for businesses under federal agency regulation. Explore the potential impact and gain practical insights from esteemed legal professionals, Dan Jarcho and Christopher (CJ) Frisina, in a discussion grounded in real-world implications. Save your spot and stay informed about the future of administrative law. Don't miss this opportunity to understand the potential shifts in the balance of power among the three branches of government. #SCOTUS #AdministrativeLaw #LegalInsights https://bit.ly/3RYb4gW

The Chevron doctrine requires judicial deference to the reasonable interpretations of a law by a Government agency. This is because of the expertise required in specialized domains, the lack of time or ability for Congress to tackle the details of the law, and the flexibility required for Government agencies to respond to the realities on the ground, including changes in technologies and the operating context. However, in a recent U.S. Supreme Court decision, the court has overturned this longstanding rule. Instead, it ruled that courts must exercise their independent judgment in deciding whether a Government agency has acted within its statutory authority. On a strict, literal, and technical application of the rule of law and the separation of powers, the court's decision is arguably right. However, the effects of the decision are likely to cast voluminous sets of regulations into doubt, prolong the time and complexity of getting laws enacted and revised by Congress, create more litigation work in Court, and curtail the efficacy and efficiency of administration by Government agencies. A better suggested balance is as follows. Judicial review of delegated legislative work should be tightly scoped to the Government agency acting ultra vires (meaning outside the scope of the law), if the regulation is inconsistent with other laws, and non-compliance with due process. The details of delegated legislation should then be left to be drafted by the experts in the Government agency, but always subject to Congressional oversight. Such oversight can take the form of requiring the regulation to be laid before Congress for a specified time for objections or concerns to be surfaced, before it takes effect. The rule of law requires a balance of power between the three branches of Government. If any one branch appropriates too much power for itself, the system goes out of whack and injustice, ironically, often results. #ruleoflaw #courts #chevrondoctrine #publicpolicy (Image: Chevron)