Patricio Valdivieso, Ph.D.’s Post

View profile for Patricio Valdivieso, Ph.D., graphic

Vice President of Analysis at Rystad Energy - Oil Markets

Had the oil market already priced Iran’s attack? Around 2 a.m. GMT, news broke that three Israeli drones over the Iranian city of Isfahan had been shot down. This marks a decisive moment since Israel was expected to retaliate after Iran’s recent attack. However, markets appeared not to have priced in Israel’s counteroffensive. After the weekend attacks, many market participants were anticipating upside pressure in the Monday open, but the session was uneventful and the rest of the week had so far seen losses of around $3.5 per barrel – bringing Brent price back to 24 March levels of around $86.5 per barrel as of the Thursday session. After last night’s 2 a.m. GMT drone attack at Isfahan, ICE Brent front-month futures jumped $3 to $90 per barrel, before quickly falling back to the same level as the Thursday close. How do we reconcile the escalating risk with this week’s bearish price movement? Markets tend to factor in unaccounted risk as price action – that is, markets react to new information, so it matters whether or not the event was expected. Markets had likely already accounted for the possibility of the event. Brent rose to $92 per barrel last week, while front-month futures closed at $90.5 on Friday. Rystad Energy calculates that the “fair value” of Brent for April, based on fundamentals, is around $83 per barrel. If, the markets had already accounted for the extraordinary event and Brent at $92 per barrel as of last week implied a $5-7 deviation from fundamental value, then this week’s current reversion to the fundamental value should be a surprise. In terms of the risk of disruption to Iranian exports and production, on average 1 million bpd of Iranian crude goes to China and competes in the medium-sour basket against grades that offer similar product yields, with the likes of Basrah medium (Iraq), Arab Medium (Saudi Arabia), Oman Blend (Oman), and Upper Zakum (UAE). China’s total imports of medium-sour grades ranged between 6.5 million and 7.5 million bpd in the past year, and if Iranian production is disrupted, there are viable alternatives among Middle East producers with spare capacity. China accumulated substantial amounts of crude in commercial storage during the second half of 2023. How likely it is that Iran’s production infrastructure is effectively affected? Around 90% of Iran’s exports leave from the Kharg Island oil terminal in the Persian Gulf, which is fed by a network of pipelines across the country. There is one oil refinery operated by NIOC in Isfahan, the city that received the first retaliatory attacks by Israel this morning. The distribution of wells is also key. More details about Iran's oil fundamentals and overall infraestructure risk in the full commentary. Our clients, have full access in the link below: https://lnkd.in/e2yT4AUs Mukesh Sahdev Janiv Shah Kartik Arvind Allyson Agosta Jorge León Rohan Goindi Aditya Rath Susan Bell Amir Zaman Billy Snaith

  • No alternative text description for this image
Mohamed ROUABHI

Senior Process specialized at LNG plant

2mo

Thanks for analysis ...what is the potential damage to supplies from China in the event of an Israeli attack on Iran.....Russia can ensure sufficient quantity. what is startigy would make usa via oil of venezuela sotarage. Its self-sufficiency

Like
Reply

To view or add a comment, sign in

Explore topics