Newance ’s Post

"Grateful for the insightful industrial trip to Grazitti Interactive . 🚀 Witnessed cutting-edge technologies, collaborative work environments, and gained valuable insights into the software development lifecycle. Kudos to the team for the warm welcome and knowledge-sharing! Excited to apply these learnings in my future projects. #SoftwareIndustry #LearningJourney #ProfessionalDevelopment"

7 simple questions to know if your team's sprint works well: 1. The team knows what they should be 𝘄𝗼𝗿𝗸𝗶𝗻𝗴 𝗼𝗻. 2. The team knows why their work is 𝘃𝗮𝗹𝘂𝗮𝗯𝗹𝗲. 3. The team can determine if their work is 𝗰𝗼𝗺𝗽𝗹𝗲𝘁𝗲. 4. The team knows how to figure out what to work on 𝗻𝗲𝘅𝘁. 5. Stakeholders can learn what the team is 𝘄𝗼𝗿𝗸𝗶𝗻𝗴 on. 6. Stakeholders can learn what the team will work on 𝗻𝗲𝘅𝘁. 7. Stakeholders know how to 𝗶𝗻𝗳𝗹𝘂𝗲𝗻𝗰𝗲 the team’s plans. 𝘛𝘩𝘪𝘴 𝘸𝘢𝘴 𝘪𝘯𝘴𝘱𝘪𝘳𝘦𝘥 𝘣𝘺 𝘢 𝘤𝘩𝘢𝘱𝘵𝘦𝘳 𝘪𝘯 Will Larson'𝘴 𝘨𝘳𝘦𝘢𝘵 '𝘈𝘯 𝘌𝘭𝘦𝘨𝘢𝘯𝘵 𝘗𝘶𝘻𝘻𝘭𝘦: 𝘚𝘺𝘴𝘵𝘦𝘮𝘴 𝘰𝘧 𝘌𝘯𝘨𝘪𝘯𝘦𝘦𝘳𝘪𝘯𝘨 𝘔𝘢𝘯𝘢𝘨𝘦𝘮𝘦𝘯𝘵', 𝘸𝘩𝘪𝘤𝘩 𝘐 𝘳𝘦𝘢𝘭𝘭𝘺 𝘦𝘯𝘫𝘰𝘺𝘦𝘥! Join 13,000+ engineers who receive weekly articles on managing software teams: https://lnkd.in/dmvYbssM

Want to excel in #TechJobs abroad? Here's an event to consider. Check the details below.

Here's a video taken from my talks on how organisations can build superior software development capability in the long term. https://lnkd.in/eC4UcShZ

Explore the main product engineering approaches, including PoC, prototype, and MVP, in our article to define which one is the best fit for your project. You’ll also learn what steps and resources each approach requires and review real-life examples of PoC, prototype, and MVP development based on our experience at: https://bit.ly/4bNkZhs

Another day, another challenge. Has this ever happened to you? You come up with a new tooling idea to streamline workflows across the organization. You, excited, share this idea with the platform engineering team. However, the initial reaction is defensive. They begin questioning its feasibility, pointing out potential flaws, and raising concerns. This defensive stance feels like they're stacking bricks one after another, building a wall labeled 'No.' Have you ever considered that you might also be the one saying no? Read on to discover how embracing a 'Yes-First' mentality can transform your team's dynamics, encourating innovation and collaboration. https://lnkd.in/dMw-84rs 👆👆👆👆👆

Inspiring! https://lnkd.in/dsppJqYC _"At 37signals, three is a magic number. Nearly all new product work is done by teams of three people. A team of three is usually composed of two programmers and one designer. And if it’s not three, it’s two or one — not four or five. We don’t throw more people at problems, we chisel problems down until they can be tackled by three people, at most. We rarely have meetings, but when we do, you’ll hardly ever find more than three people on a call. Any conversation with more than three people is typically a conversation with too many people. What if there are five departments involved in a project or a decision? There aren’t. Too many dependencies. We don’t work on projects like that — intentionally. What is it with three? Three is a wedge, and that’s why it works. Three has a sharp point. It’s an odd number so there are no ties. It’s powerful enough to make a dent, but also weak enough to not break what isn’t broken. Big teams make things worse all the time by applying too much force to things that only need to be lightly finessed. The problem with four is that you almost always need to add a fifth to manage. The problem with five is that it’s two too many. And six, seven, or eight on a team will inevitably make simple things more complicated than they need to be. Just like work expands to fill the time available, work expands to fill the team available. Small, short projects become bigger, longer projects simply because all those people need something to do. You can do big things with small teams, but it’s a whole hell of a lot harder to do small things with big teams. That’s a disadvantage of big teams! Small things are often all that’s necessary. The occasional big thing is great, but most improvements come as small incremental steps. Big teams can step right over those small moves. Three keeps you honest. It tempers your ambition in all the right ways. It requires you to make tradeoffs, rather than keep adding things in. And most importantly, three reduces miscommunication and improves coordination. Three people can talk directly with one another without introducing hearsay. And it’s a heck of a lot easier to coordinate three people’s schedules than four or more. Three is all-in for us."_

Traditional methods don’t have to be outdated or boring. We get proven results from traditional methods by refreshing them with our own creative spin and engaged moderating style. Paired with modern technology, our methods generate proven results from consumers anywhere in the world. https://buff.ly/3Wtif1v #storytellers #listeners #mrx #qualresearch #creativity #experience #customizedresearch #insights #marketresearch

Explore transformative code review techniques with Tess Ferrandez at Swetugg Stockholm. Learn how to make reviews more positive and effective with 10 actionable tips, fostering better team dynamics and code quality. https://lnkd.in/dRNShkGT

Achieving the best possible results for our partners requires constant testing, iterating, and discovery. Explore the insights we’re sharing regularly from our team of experts: https://hubs.li/Q0251LYm0