Lily Zheng’s Post

View profile for Lily Zheng, graphic
Lily Zheng Lily Zheng is an Influencer

Diversity, Equity & Inclusion Strategist. Bestselling Author of Reconstructing DEI and DEI Deconstructed. They/Them. LinkedIn Top Voice on Racial Equity. Inquiries: lilyzheng.co.

I'll admit it: #diversity, #equity, and #inclusion doesn't benefit "everyone." But the people this work excludes aren't who you think. 🌱 DEI aims to create better organizations for men—but not misogynists. 🌱 DEI aims to create better organizations for white people—but not white supremacists. 🌱 DEI aims to create better organizations for cisgender and heterosexual people—but not transphobes or homophobes. 🌱 DEI aims to create better organizations for non-disabled people—but not eugenicists. And with each of these, the former far, FAR outnumbers the latter. In tearing down and transforming the systems, policies, processes, and practices that uphold inequity in our organizations, DEI work aims first and foremost to end unfairness, bias, discrimination, and mistreatment of all kinds. Of course this work will benefit those most targeted by historical inequity—but it'll benefit virtually everyone else, too. ⚖️ Hiring policies that genuinely measure experience and competency rather than discriminatory "like-me" bias and favoritism? Good for everyone. ⚖️ Managerial support for everyone, not just people who happen to share social circles with the manager? Good for everyone. ⚖️Pay that accurately reflects contribution and skill, rather than what school you went to or how well you can fast-talk a hiring manager? Good for everyone. That's why so many people, including huge numbers of men, white people, cisgender people, straight people, non-disabled people, and other folks who might have one or more socially advantaged identities back DEI work. It's only the small number of die-hard misogynists, white supremacists, transphobes and homophobes, eugenicists, and others who have tied hate and inequity into their sense of identity that are doing everything they can to take down DEI. They're using brute-force misinformation and zero-sum fearmongering to paint a picture of a DEI boogeyman so malicious that it scares people into rejecting progress for everyone in favor of a status quo that's good only for the select few. They make the argument that men "should" be misogynists, that white people "should" be white supremacists, that dominance and inequity is better than collaboration and fairness. It's honestly offensive. And the good people who see through it are right to call it out. If you're seeing this kind of bad-faith rhetoric impact your organization, don't enable it with your silence. You're anti-discrimination, pro-fairness, and want to build an organization where everyone can thrive—that's why you're working to improve your organization, rather than rewind it to how things might have been a century ago. Share the facts with confidence. Make it clear you won't tolerate hate. Continue unshaken with the work that makes a difference, toward greater diversity, equity, and inclusion for all.

The conversation that worries me happening with friends and neighbors who I know are supportive of change is the strong belief that their white sons don't have any opportunities and that's the message that seems to be getting through from supremacists and misogynists. The interesting thing with most is that if they have a second son or daughter, they are often thriving. I just hate that the conversation happening at home with the one is about blaming others and they truly believe it to be the case.

Trevor Davison

Analytics Consultant and Manager | Measurement Strategy, Performance Excellence, Process Improvement | Driving data and efficiency

3mo

I’m white and I’m male and I’m cis, but I am absolutely all-in with DEI. Different viewpoints and life experiences are beneficial in all kinds of organizations. Besides, why would i want to be in an environment where everyone is exactly like me? That would be boring. Plus, promoting your company’s DEI initiatives is a big draw to all of the very talented people who don’t fit the narrow definition of “the majority”. As a gay man, I would only ever want to work for a company where that wouldn’t be held against me. The same could be said for non-white, non-male, etc. Not being inclusive will severely limit a company’s hiring pool, which will have serious long-term consequences for their competitiveness. DEI is an investment in the company’s future.

Might I make a slight adjustment to the narrative. White supremists are the extreme for the groups that exclude. The majority are those that have systemically enjoyed white privilege. These are the folks that say we are all for inclusion up to the point that they realize 'Wait a minute now I have competition'. This group is more pervasive and has higher numbers and remain delusional because they want to keep privilege and do not see that as a problem.

Valerie Alexander

CEO, Speak Happiness | Engaging Keynotes, Effective Workshops and Eye-opening Corporate Culture Assessments | Reach out at SpeakHappiness.com | Build a Happier, More Inclusive, More Profitable Workplace Today

3mo

The people who are also harmed by equity and inclusion are the privileged mediocre. They have never had to show excellence to keep their jobs and even advance. With a broader talent pool, equitably assessed and given equal opportunities to grow (including the opportunity to learn from failure), an organization has access to a lot more excellence, and the smartest employers will do everything in their power to grab up all that excellence, no matter what it looks like, who it loves, what language it speaks, what physical abilities it has, etc. So those who have never had to exhibit true excellence are feeling the biggest squeeze, since now they are simply not good enough, thus the ugly pushback. A tiger is fiercest near death. But the death is imminent in this one, and the fully inclusive future is going to pass all of these mediocre dinosaurs right on by.

I am also noticing this trend from leaders like Elon Musk where people are tearing down DEI by saying that if we want to end racial discrimination we need to stop focusing on it with DEI training. I do not agree with Elon but worth mentioning as this narrative seems to come up in the news often. You are so generous with your wisdom. Would love to connect some time. Thank you for all that you do.

Justin Cobb

Creator | Corporate Sustainability Strategist | Cultural Intelligence Expert | Founder | Researcher | Speaker | Collecting and sharing stories of people across the globe who are making a difference.

3mo

Thank you Lily Zheng for speaking on this topic. It is especially concerning, given recent reports, that show some of our leaders are supporting some of the egregious causes known to humanity not in their words but in who they choose to give a platform. Recently, I have been doing a lot of internal work on how to understand the legacy and the history of empire and conquest not on the macro, but the micro-level. How these actions impact the affairs of ordinary people living their lives. This comes from both professional and personal experience. It is a lot of mental and emotional work but it is worth it. What is particularly concerning is the evidence I am finding that shows how abuse, trauma, and negligence are serving to perpetuate the project of conquest even to this day. What would you recommend to someone like me who is exploring the legacy of conquest on the human spirit, for both the conqueror and the conquered?

Like
Reply
Marsha Ramroop FRSA FIEDP

Author: Building Inclusion, A Practical Guide to EDI in Architecture & Built Environment, pub Routledge *PREORDER NOW!* | Global Award-winning strategist in org inclusion using CQ | Compassionate & honest agent of change

3mo

Yep, 💯I tend to say: It's inclusion for all, or it's not inclusion at all. Inclsuive behaviours + polices, procedures and practices = equitable outcomes that are "good for everyone'.

Elle McCarthy

VP & GM / P&L Owner / Brand & Marketing / Advisory board member / Strong opinions, lightly held / Ford / PayPal / Electronic Arts / Virgin / BBC

3mo

Well said. I cannot believe that the efforts of passionate and earnest young people trying to build a better world are being called “divisive” today.

John Macklin

Independent Chemicals Professional

3mo

The statement that DEIR does not benefit everyone is a narrow view. It certainly would benefit everyone in our society! First, just the educational value in getting to know more about people and better understand other cultures will help to reduce fear and tension and increase productivity. Open opportunity could reduce crime and interpersonal misgivings. That is, the nation would be a better place for all to have better lives.

Like
Reply

DEI aims to create organizations that can transform and be innovative. Without diverse perspectives organizations become stagnant. What most organizations do not realize is that there are very high costs in not being inclusive that they can not see because they are built upon a structure where everyone looks acts and responds the same that feel everything is great because they have no other perspective.

See more comments

To view or add a comment, sign in

Explore topics