Lily Ray’s Post

View profile for Lily Ray, graphic

Vice President, SEO Strategy & Research

Update on Google’s new carousel for “best credit cards” - turns out Google doesn’t really give us the “best” cards here, but rather, an endless list of cards 🙃 well, 500 to be precise. Check out this exchange between Glenn Gabe, Matic Broz and me. Interesting that Google absolutely cracked down on “review” sites over the past few years, many of which fell into the financial/credit card comparison space, with strict guidelines about providing valuable reviews that demonstrate real-life experience and go above and beyond what the manufacturer says. Now we have this at the top of the SERP. #seo

  • No alternative text description for this image
Jessica Levenson

VP, Digital Strategy & SEO at NetSuite and Oracle | STEMinist | Public Speaker | Content and Buying Journeys

4w

I know I love 500 options before I make a decision... :D

Robbin Schuchmann

👈🏼 Seeking Interns or an Internship? Poke Here! Let’s Connect.

4w

Just curious, do you really think there is a BEST card ? There is a best card for specific use cases. Not saying this SERP is a great answer. But I am kinda tired of seeing articles : top 10 best and rank 1-10. All cards offer different benefits and different cons. Obviously the articles of US news and Forbes are trash, but not sure if Google adding themselves there is worse than most affiliate articles.

Limari Colón (She/Her)

Head of Content Strategy | SEO Executive | Digital Marketing Executive | Affiliate Marketing Leader

4w

This disturbs me on so many levels: “Interesting that Google absolutely cracked down on ‘review’ sites over the past few years, many of which fell into the financial/credit card comparison space, with strict guidelines about providing valuable reviews that demonstrate real-life experience and go above and beyond what the manufacturer says. Now we have this at the top of the SERP.”

Mike Ciffone

SEO Consultant & Founder of Ciffone Digital

4w

Of course, because "their experience is better"...the arrogance.

Seb Atkinson

Technical SEO | International SEO | Search Awards Judge

4w

Google’s requirements if you’re a publisher: “Focus on what you liked or disliked about a product and your own experience using it.” Google’s requirements if you’re Google: 500 random products with no context, ratings or other descriptive content

Ugh as an SEO, hate this. But as a user, hate even more. I just want a top 3, or at least a measure of who it's best for. If they're going to just dump a bunch of cards in a carousel, there's no point in any of it. Why is Google hoping to keep traffic from publishers by providing a less good user experience?

Sean Fleming

SEO Lead @ MONY Group (formerly MoneySuperMarket Group)

4w

No checks for eligibility, no rep APR. pushing users towards direct applications (with hard credit checks) is financially harmful and extremely careless. very poor.

Kaj Kandler

Knowledge Graph Optimization | Specializing in personal branding for Public Speakers and Coaches | Educating search engines about notable people

3w

It's like asking LLMs about "the best" or "rank by ...." It's all bullshit if you know how these things work. It's even more scary if you realize that Google rewrites your query based n what ever it calls context. In that case it often adds silently something like "best ..." or "... near by".

Like
Reply
Luigi F.

Performance Marketing Leader | SEM, SEO, Content, A/B Testing, Strategy

4w

It looks like a test to understand engagement prior to some kind of paid ad launch.

Like
Reply

The funniest thing about this is that they actually call it a feature.

Like
Reply
See more comments

To view or add a comment, sign in

Explore topics