A correction to this #NewYorkTimes article is in order! The article undoubtedly celebrates the astounding accomplishment of 17 year-old Dr. Dorothy Jean Tillman II. What may not be as apparent is the sleight of hand that "robs" the young Doctor of her just due of being rightly referred to as Dr. Dorothy Jean Tillman II, not Ms. Dorothy Jean Tillman II, in the article.
While this may be a "small potatoes" issue to some, or a non issue to others, I offer the framing that it is indeed a big issue! Words matter, context matters, and how words are used by those who are in power matters!
So what's the issue? I'm glad you asked! The article while celebrating the remarkable achievement of Dr. Dorothy Jean Tillman II having earned her Ph.D. at the age of 17, consistently references her as Ms. Dorothy Jean Tillman II, and not Dr. Dorothy Jean Tillman II. I'm curious to know, how is it that the subject of the article, who earned her Ph.D. degree at 17 years old, is not accorded the proper and earned honorific of Dr. in the write up? Is it that inconceivable that a 17 year old could earn a doctorate degree? Is it that inconceivable that a 17 year-old Black female could earn a doctorate degree? Whatever the dissonance is, it is clear Dr. Dorothy Jean Tillman II's achieved status of Doctor was not used to reference her throughout the article that discusses her achievement.
Minimizing the achieved master status of Dr., by not referencing Dorothy Jean Tillman II as Dr. and maximizing the ascribed master status of Ms., by only referencing Dorothy Jean Tillman II as Ms., is a form of #microaggression. And yes, microaggressions can be unintentional. Unintentional, notwithstanding, the impact is just as bruising as intentional microaggressions.
Dr. Dorothy Jean Tillman II earned a Ph.D. #CallHerDrDorothyJeanTillmanII
That's it, that's the post!
Ed.M. Candidate, Harvard Graduate School of Education | STEAM Initiatives Fellow, CDE Foundation
2wSo grateful to KIPP SoCal for the longtime support of my family!