Kevin Dowd’s Post

View profile for Kevin Dowd, graphic

Senior writer at Carta

Over the past two years, the leverage in VC funding negotiations has tilted in favor of investors. There are exceptions to this new rule, to be sure. The buzziest AI startups, for instance, are still juggling multiple highly attractive offers, and in many cases are able to dictate terms. But for many startups, raising capital has grown more difficult—and more likely to involve deal terms that offer protection to their investors. Frances C. Mosley has worked on a number of venture fundraisings over the past several months in her role as a counsel at WilmerHale. She's seen signs of the shift. “I’m seeing a lot more investor-favorable types of terms, as well as investor-favorable valuations,” Mosley told me. So too has Jonathan O'Connell, a partner at Crowell & Moring who's also been deep in the weeds on VC dealmaking in 2024. “I’m definitely seeing more participating preferred, usually with a cap from 1.5x to 3x,” O’Connell told me. “I’m seeing different types of more investor-friendly anti-dilution protection, like full ratchet. And I’m occasionally seeing some redemption rights.”  What else have Mosley and O'Connell been seeing in the market so far this year? And what does Carta data have to say on the state of liquidation preferences, cumulative dividends, and other investor-friendly deal terms? My latest story dives into it all—check the comments for a link. And a big thanks to Frances and Jonathan for sharing their insights!

  • No alternative text description for this image

To view or add a comment, sign in

Explore topics