Joshua Novick’s Post

View profile for Joshua Novick, graphic
Joshua Novick Joshua Novick is an Influencer

Managing Partner @ Bondo Advisors | M&A, Corporate Finance in the Tech Vertical. I sell your company!

🚀 Procter & Gamble vs. Unilever: Who is the master of #ConsumerGoods sector❓ 📊 Revenue: 🥇P&G’s revenue ($84B TTM) is 27% above Unilever’s ($66B TTM). 🥈Unilever is still only about half the size of P&G (if you exclude their business in food/nutrition where they compete with giants like Nestlé and Danone , with brands like Lipton -correction-sold to CVC in 2022-, Hellmann's, or Ben & Jerry's). 📊 Growth Rates: P&G (Tide , Pantene , Olay , Crest , Gilette, etc)  has grown faster Unilever (Dove , Axe , Pond's , Vaseline, etc) in the past 5 years: 4.5% CAGR vs. 3% % CAGR but slower in the past decade: 1.1% versus 1.7% 🥉Other Players: Henkel: $24B (Persil, Schwarzkopf, Fa) Kimberly-Clark: $20B (Kleenex, Huggies, Scott) Colgate-Palmolive: $20B (Ajax, Colgate, Palmolive) Reckitt: $19B (Durex, Lysol, Finish) The sum ($83B) is less than the billings of P&G ($84B) 💸 #Profitability: 🥇P&G (almost $15B Net Profit) is substantially more profitable than 🥈Unilever ($7B Net Profit), more than 2❎. 📈 #MarketCap: 🏆P&G is the sweetheart of investors. Its market cap is 3X Unilever ($390B versus $135B). 🤑Unilever is currently trading at 14X EV/EBITDA (TTM) and 2.5X Sales (TTM). P&G is trading at a premium 17X EV/EBITDA (TTM) and 5X Sales (TTM). 🌍 #Global Presence: Both companies have a global footprint but with brands and products often adapted to the local tastes of consumers. They have grown through a combination of #acquiring existing successful brands and developing their own new brands. 🔍 Differences: #Procter: A pure player in home care and personal care. P&G's Sales Breakdown: 🔹Fabric & Home Care: 35% 🔹Baby, Feminine & Family Care: 25% 🔹Beauty: 18% 🔹Health Care: 14% 🔹Grooming (Gillette): 8% Geographic Sales: 🔹North America: 50% 🔹Europe: 21% 🔹Greater China: 9% 🔹Asia Pacific: 8% 🔹Latin America: 7% 🔹India, Middle East & Africa (IMEA): 5% #Unilever: Formed in 1929 from the merger of Margarine Unie and Lever Brothers. Unilever's Sales Breakdown (2023): 🔹Personal Care: 23% 🔹Home Care: 21% 🔹Beauty and Wellbeing: 21% 🔹Food Segment, Ice Creams, and Nutrition: 35% Geographic Sales: 🔹Asia/Pacific/Africa: 44% 🔹Americas: 36% (USA 20%) 🔹Europe: 20% 🔬 R&D Investment: 💊Both companies invest substantially in R&D, but P&G invests $2B (2023), twice as much as Unilever’s $1B.

  • P&G versus Unilever.
Hanif Ajari

Director Export Network, Inst. Business & CS at Getz Pharma

1w

Very informative Unilever and Procter & Gamble (P&G) differ significantly in their strategies and market presence. P&G is renowned for its robust marketing capabilities, being the largest advertiser globally, and has a significant presence in the chemicals industry. In contrast, Unilever has faced challenges in the chemicals sector, with some major soap and detergent makers exiting the field. Despite this, Unilever has a stronger brand image and consumer base in markets like Pakistan. P&G's chemicals business generates substantial revenue, whereas Unilever focuses more on its consumer goods segment. These differences highlight the contrasting approaches and strengths of each company.

Abdelillah Brital

Supply Chain Director FMCG| Pharma| Unilever| Hikma pharmaceutical|Americana UAE♦️KSA♦️KUW♦️EGYPT♦️MOROCCO ♦️ALGERIA♦️TUNISIA♦️LOWER GULF

1w

Good comparison, worth to mention as well that both companies invest a lot on their people s development

Sven Dr. Mulfinger

Executive Coach | Strategy Consultant | VISTAGE Spain Chair | CEO | Impact-driven Serial Entrepreneur | Lifelong Learner

1w

Any data on sustainability? Is making money the only interesting metric?

Vicente Campodonico Kuljevan

Gerente General en Molinos del Mundo

1w

Lipton (and other premium tea brands) are not part of UL portfolio since early 2022 ... the result of this analysis should change depending the year it was made

Madjid KHENNOUS

Budget, Reporting and Control Analyst || Oil & Gaz || FMCG ||

1w

This is a great comparison of two industry leaders in the FMCG # sector. P&G’s higher revenue, profitability, and market cap highlight their strong market position and investor confidence. Unilever, however, stands out with its diverse product range and broad geographical reach. Both companies excel in investing in their people, marketing, finance, and R&D, driving continuous innovation and growth. Their unique strengths make them exemplary in the industry.

Hans Boynton

Marketing and Advertising Consultant

1w

If employee satisfaction is similar at both companies,as some have mentioned, it is interesting no note that revenue per employee is substantially higher at P&G. In general terms (and with a very simplistic view) it would appear that P&G is doing more with less.

Maciej Pichlak

Marketing Director | Brand Director | Head of Marketing | Marketing Consultant | Marketing Strategist | CMO | D2C | FMCG | Fintech | Dyrektor Marketingu | Generative AI | ex-Unilever | ex-Cadbury | ex-Carlsberg |

1w

Interesting insights Joshua, I believe Unilever's obsession with publicly displaying sustainability credentials comes at the expense of focusing on business fundamentals. A company that feels the need to define the purpose of Hellmann’s mayonnaise has clearly lost the plot. P&G's focus on core business practices and innovation brings better results and long-term stability.

The comparison highlights P&G's impressive lead in revenue, profitability, and market cap over Unilever, underscoring its dominant position in the consumer goods sector. However, Unilever's diverse portfolio and significant presence in the Asia-Pacific region demonstrate its strategic focus and growth potential in key emerging markets.

Elena Avanzato

Buyer Director presso PEA Srl

1w

Very helpful!

Like
Reply
Aayush Wadhwa

R&D Deputy Manager at PepsiCo | Global Specifications Management (Foods portfolio)

1w

Insightful! Thanks for sharing

See more comments

To view or add a comment, sign in

Explore topics