Joseph Rowntree Foundation (JRF)’s Post

🌐 Latest JRF and We and AI research shows - 78% of non-profit and grassroots organisations use generative AI tools in some capacity - 71% do so to work more efficiently But these organisations haven't been adequately represented in discussions or decisions on the design, use and governance of AI technologies. 🤔 We commissioned We and AI to explore: Why and how do non-profit and grassroots organisations engage with generative AI tools and the broader AI debate? We found that non-profit and grassroots organisations are excited about the potential for generative AI tools to: - increase their productivity - lighten workloads - remove administrative or access barriers - enhance service delivery ❌ But opportunities are not without challenges. - 73% of organisations use generative AI tools without any formal policies or guidelines in place. Concerns were raised around privacy, accuracy and bias, alongside ethical dilemmas. - 47% of organisations use Gen-AI tools to save labour costs. - 59% feel they aren't engaged in the broader AI debate. Without sector engagement, initiatives aimed at developing AI for public good cannot have an adequate understanding of what that might entail. 🔎 Find out more from Yasmin Ibison and We and AI: https://lnkd.in/emnNySva

  • AI replaces at least three people. Ethically and morally, I don't feel great about it, but due to the lack of support and funding for charities, the choices I have are: there's no organisation, or to use what's there.
susan sullivan FRSA

MCAD Badge: Biomimicry Design, MOOC circular economy, BA Open Degree.

3w

then do it for free- what you do when you use this is create greater costs to be fixed and more 'waste' there is no away for anything!

Like
Reply
Kenny Wood

Founder at Mind Bicycle | Passionate STEM Ambassador | Shaping Tomorrow's Innovations & Ideas

3w
See more comments

To view or add a comment, sign in

Explore topics