Jorge Armando Cabrera Herrera’s Post

View profile for Jorge Armando Cabrera Herrera, graphic

Product Designer | UX/UI Designer | Visual Designer | Lead Designer at Domestika

How to measure, manage and prioritize design debt.

View organization page for Helio, graphic

6,858 followers

Improve UX success by measuring, managing, and prioritizing design debt. We love Joana Cerejo’s article (by way of Juan Fernando Pacheco) as a practical guide to measuring and managing design debt, focusing on transforming businesses into user-centered successes. Design debt is akin to technical debt, reflecting the accumulated effects of past design and development decisions that negatively impact user experience. Check out her post: https://lnkd.in/gFXCCQqa Types of design debt: UX design debt ↳Directly affects business goals by impacting adoption rates, learnability, and user satisfaction. Operational design debt ↳Results from inefficient processes and poor organizational structures supporting design and development teams. Visual design debt ↳UI inconsistencies that undermine the product’s credibility. Testing and research debt ↳Lack of UX research and testing leads to poor user experiences and lower product adoption. Understanding and addressing design debt is necessary for enhancing user satisfaction and achieving business success. Joana emphasizes the importance of a strategic approach to managing design debt, aligning design improvements with business objectives for optimal results. We agree! Using iterative design and continuous research with Helio is an amazing way to reduce your design debt and create a business lift. #uxresearch #productdiscovery #marketresearch #productdesign

  • The image is a flowchart titled "Design Debt" with the subheading "Measure, manage, and prioritize design debt to improve UX success." 

The flowchart starts at a "Starting Point" and asks a series of questions to categorize design issues:

"Does the problem occur on a red route?"

 If yes, the next question is, "Is the problem difficult to overcome?" 

If no, it's a Cosmetic Issue.

If yes, it asks, "Is the problem persistent?" If no, it's a Minor Issue.

If yes, it asks, "Is the problem persistent?" If no, it's a Major Issue.

If yes, it's categorized as Unusable.

The chart uses different colors to indicate issue severity: Red for Unusable, Orange for Major Issue, Yellow for Minor Issue, Purple for Cosmetic Issue, Green for No Issues, and Gray for Not Applicable. 

A legend explains each category's impact on usability and priority for fixing.

To view or add a comment, sign in

Explore topics