Johnny Parks’ Post

View profile for Johnny Parks, graphic

Founder of TOWARD, CSO at Hoolr & soon-to-be author ✍️ 📖

Some thoughts/questions on belonging and disruption below. I’d appreciate your help in navigating this… I’m predisposed to resisting the status quo or BAU in organisations. It feels like the opposite of evolution, entrepreneurship, progress & growth. Therefore, I’m drawn to disruption and appropriate provocation in organisations. I encourage the people we coach/train through TOWARD Ltd to disrupt. However…by disrupting, some employees risk the opportunity to belong. They may get misunderstood, isolated or pushed to the periphery. Myself and my wonderful colleagues Sarah Jones, Denise McGahan, Gordon Laird and Gillian Dornan have been working with a client and this has been a live debate. There’s a tension…or a thin path to navigate. - Can people disrupt and also belong? - Is the need to belong an appropriate need to expect an organisation to address? - Can employees address the need to belong at home…in order to free up the need to disrupt at work? - Should employees prioritise disruption over belonging? Thoughts appreciated folks… 🤔

Tony Williams

Global Account Director I Board & CEO Advisory | M&A | Organizational Strategy I Accredited Executive Coach I Transformation Leader I C-Suite HR Leader I Author I Board Member I Philanthropist

1mo

As those great human philosophers 'Fun Boy Three' once sang, "Tain't what you do (it's the way that you do it)". I have been hired as a disruptor more than once in my career and you never get it all right all of the time. And as has been said, it really does depend on the organisation, the leadership and culture that prevails, and, how much personal risk you want to deploy. I have been a 'stranded' disruptor and it's not a great place to be, but you also can't be everybody's friend as that will almost certainly lead to misunderstanding and frustration. As the lyrics go on to confirm, it really is "a game of chess" and strategising the balance between pushing for change whilst being part of the team is key.

Kevin Ball

Interim Chief People Officer | Interim Chief Human Resources Officer | Interim HR Director

1mo

It’s a huge question, particularly for this forum. My summary position is held in an approach for senior leadership which is respectful of the past whether they were part of it or not, realistic about the organisation’s present - acknowledging the collective’s investment in what’s good and optimistic about the group’s ability to achieve change. That position is inside the group and demonstrably belonging to to heritage, the people and the future.

Ian Mitchell

Developmental Partner to Coaches & Leaders | Partner at Harthill LLP | Researching Spiritual Accompaniment at Uni of Birmingham | Association for Coaching (AC) Area Chair Europe | Quaker

1mo

Also, can we see this as a both/and? Can I be both disruptive and belong? And if so what might it look like? I’m wondering whether voluntary belonging looks & feels any different from need driven belonging. And whether I can be mindfully disruptive - offering my viewpoint passionately without becoming attached to it. There’s a lot in this to dig into here …

Antony Brentnall - Principal

Talentum Group Limited - Executive Coaching & Facilitation, Talent, Succession Planning, Organisational Design and Development. Consultant to Goalhanger Productions & We Have Ways of Making You Talk

1mo

Hi Johnny - I think unless organisations EMBRACE those who disrupt and take on board why they do it and how important it is, then they are missing out on a trick! We need people from all views, angles and approaches to get in the huddle and discuss, debate and disagree but always leaning in whilst doing so. Take it for what it is, helpful constructive criticism and challenge for the way things are done around here and why carry on doing so!!! Organisations that get that right - thrive! Ps would love to have a coffee if you are looking for associates that specialise in this 😜

I don't think it has to be an "either/or" situation. It is possible to do both, but much depends on the culture of the organisation and hence how disruption is perceived and treated. In an ideal scenario individuals will feel safe to voice contentious views because the possible value is appreciated and their ideas may be acted on.

Stephen Harte

Executive Leadership coach, GP, Specialty Training Programme Director, Clinical Teaching Fellow at QUB

1mo

I wonder about the barriers to workplace disruption… what parts arise when I consider it and which parts of me are inclined to favour the status quo. Certainly if disruption is linked to potential job loss or being overlooked due to a lack of safety then it’s likely to cut it off pretty quickly. Maybe disruption is higher up maslows hierarchy than we realise.

Gregg Reid

Creative Director at Hundred Studio

1mo

I think it all comes back to motive - “I want to disrupt to make things better” is a positive approach in any business. The issue is going to be in how it’s perceived, and how you make it clear that it’s not about being difficult or contrary to those who may be set in their ways

Meg Peppin

Organisational Development, Culture, Facilitation and Coaching, Thinking Environment Teacher MSc, FCIPD

1mo

Is it a contracting issue? Do the coachees have a choice in whether they work with a cuach who is drawn to disruption or whether they work with a coach with a different philisophy?

See more comments

To view or add a comment, sign in

Explore topics