Jeff Berkowitz’s Post

View profile for Jeff Berkowitz, graphic

CEO, Chairman, Board Director & Private Equity Advisor

The title of the just issued Federal Trade Commission's interim report on PBM practices, "PBM's: The Powerful Middlemen inflating Drug Costs and Squeezing Main Street Pharmacies" says it all. Some light reading for a summer Tuesday! Real Endpoints will be digging in and happy to share insights. Roger Longman Ellen Licking

Pharmacy Benefit Managers: The Powerful Middlemen Inflating Drug Costs and Squeezing Main Street Pharmacies

ftc.gov

Usama Malik

Board Member | Chief Executive | Founder | Public-Private Market Fundraising | Healthcare + Tech M&A

2w

Nothing "new" in this report that industry insiders haven't already been highlighting and discussing for several years. What makes it important is that the FTC is taking a keen interest in the monopolistic behavior of these PBM's/ insurers. 1. Market Concentration: The PBM industry has become highly concentrated, with the top 3 PBMs managing 79% of prescription claims and the top 6 managing 94% 2. Vertical Integration: Major PBMs are now vertically integrated with large health insurers, pharmacies, and other healthcare segments, potentially creating conflicts of interest 3. Specialty Drug Steering: Evidence suggests PBMs may be steering patients to use their affiliated specialty pharmacies, potentially disadvantaging independent pharmacies 4. High Reimbursement Rates: For two case study specialty generic drugs, PBM-affiliated pharmacies received reimbursements 20-40 times higher than estimated drug acquisition costs 5. Opaque Contracting: PBM contracts with pharmacies are often complex, non-negotiable, and lack transparency, making it difficult for pharmacies to predict reimbursements 6. Exclusionary Rebates: Some rebate contracts between PBMs and drug manufacturers may impede competition from generic and biosimilar drugs

To view or add a comment, sign in

Explore topics