Jared Lake’s Post

View profile for Jared Lake, graphic

Agency Co-Founder |Strategic Advisor | Consultant

Most of the analysis on the trade-off to watch sports via streaming or on cable is flawed. The cost/benefit scenario always assumes that you need to subscribe to all the apps and that total cost would exceed traditional cable. So why bother? Who isn't already subscribed to a handful of these apps? The real tradeoff is between the $75+ you pay for cable, just to watch sports, and the incremental cost you may need pay for one or maybe two additional streaming subscriptions. And the extra $100 Sunday Ticket is going to cost you without a YTTV plan. I think that is how the math works for most consumers. It is fair to say that all of this is a giant nightmare for consumers to navigate. This tends to be the case when navigating transitions in media... https://lnkd.in/gYCxrbhn

With All the NFL Streaming Services, the First Month Alone Could Cost You at Least $88

With All the NFL Streaming Services, the First Month Alone Could Cost You at Least $88

cnet.com

Travis Lusk

Group Director, Digital @ Ebiquity | Author of ADLINGO.org

2mo

If Im not mistaken, you can get every local in-market game over the air for free with an HD/ATSC antenna. (Except Thursday?). Channeling Kerry Oslund on this one.

Like
Reply
Tim Napoleon

Head Of Partnerships @ Skillz Inc. | Strategic Partnerships | ex-Amazon | ex-Akamai

2mo

Watching the Raiders go 6 and 3 into the bi-week - is priceless. Prop bets offset any streaming fees, so you make money watching football.

Like
Reply
See more comments

To view or add a comment, sign in

Explore topics