Jan Beger’s Post

View profile for Jan Beger, graphic

Healthcare needs AI … because it needs the human touch.

This paper evaluates frameworks for the procurement, integration, monitoring, and evaluation of AI tools in clinical settings, focusing on mapping these to the Plan-Do-Study-Act (PDSA) cycle. 1️⃣ Plan: ▫ Assessing how AI tools can be incorporated into existing clinical workflows is critical to their successful implementation. ▫ Emphasizing the need for clear documentation and transparency about the AI tool’s functioning to build trust among users. ▫ Addressing ethical considerations, including data privacy and bias, is essential before implementing AI tools. ▫ Evaluating the financial viability of AI tools, including purchase, implementation, and maintenance costs. ▫ Ensuring AI tools meet regulatory standards and are approved by relevant authorities. ▫ Defining legal responsibilities and liabilities in case of adverse events or errors caused by AI tools. 2️⃣ Do: ▫ Successfully incorporating AI tools into the existing processes and assigning roles for their use and maintenance. ▫ Providing adequate training for end-users to effectively operate AI tools. ▫ Ensuring that AI tools are user-friendly and perceived as valuable additions to the clinical workflow. ▫ Involving a multidisciplinary team with the necessary technical and clinical expertise to support AI integration. 3️⃣ Study: ▫ Using predefined metrics like sensitivity, specificity, and accuracy to validate AI tools. ▫ Collecting feedback on user satisfaction and acceptance to identify barriers to effective use. ▫ Measuring the impact of AI tools on patient outcomes, such as morbidity and mortality rates. ▫ Establishing protocols for reporting and analyzing adverse events or system failures. 4️⃣ Act: ▫ Continuously monitoring and adjusting AI tools based on feedback and performance data to enhance their effectiveness. ✍🏻 Sarim Dawar Khan, Zahra Hoodbhoy, Raja MHR, Kim JY, Hogg HDJ, Manji AAA, et al. (2024) Frameworks for procurement, integration, monitoring, and evaluation of artificial intelligence tools in clinical settings: A systematic review. PLOS Digit Health 3(5): e0000514. DOI: 10.1371/journal.pdig.0000514

  • No alternative text description for this image

Thank you, this will be useful for what I am doing with https://gregory-ms.com/

Alexander Davey

Consultant Anaesthetist (NHSCT) & Director (@DigitalCareSys) interested in foundational AI and healthcare (who isn’t?) #CarePathASSIST & #eFluidChart. All views my own

1mo

Need to study measures in all three layers of an AI based technology: foundation layer, technical layer & sociotechical layer.

Like
Reply
Kai Saeger

Advisory Services: Digitalhealthcare (CAS-Diplom).... Innovationscout/-consulting #designthinking->#ecosystembuilding👉#smart-/safe living@home👉#AAL (Ambient Assisted Living)👉Analyse #megatrends as business driver!

1mo

thx, useful ❕ ✔

Like
Reply
Dalia Dawoud

Associate Director (Research)

1mo
Like
Reply
Yila Caiaphas

Amrita University India

1mo

Very helpful!

Like
Reply
Sandra Moreira

Neurologist at Hospital Pedro Hispano

1mo

Interesting paper!

Like
Reply
See more comments

To view or add a comment, sign in

Explore topics