Hyundai Engineering & Construction Co.,Ltd.’s Post

In an online video from Ultra Safe Nuclear Corporation, a cartoon simulation shows a tsunami wiping out one of their future nuclear power stations and cutting off power. What happens next? Not much: The reactor quietly shuts itself down. “It cools off just by sitting there, no moving parts or fluids, no operator actions,” says the reassuring video. “We’ve designed a reactor that is inherently safe no matter the events.” That revival is undergirded by two hot technology trends. Companies like Ultra Safe are aiming to build small modular reactors (SMRs) designed to be just a fraction of the size of former plants, to reduce both building costs and the scope of possible disasters.

𝗡𝘂𝗰𝗹𝗲𝗮𝗿 𝗣𝗼𝘄𝗲𝗿 𝗶𝘀 𝘁𝗵𝗲 𝗙𝘂𝘁𝘂𝗿𝗲 Can you handle the truth? Like many people I follow on LinkedIn, I was captivated by Last Energy’s small nuclear reactor (SMR) that they displayed at this week’s Data Center World Conference. According to Rich Miller from Data Center Frontier, the prototype which weighed a whopping 22 tons, and was 48 feet tall, suspended from a crane for all to see at the event. SVP of Commercial Michael Crabb at Last Energy said, "DCW 2024 is giving special attention to the data center industry’s energy needs and nuclear power’s unique position to address those needs.” While nuclear power, especially Small Modular Reactors (SMRs), holds great promise as a sustainable and efficient energy source, there are indeed significant regulatory and public perception challenges to overcome before widespread adoption can occur. Regulatory hurdles often involve stringent safety standards, licensing processes, and oversight, which can take years to navigate. These regulations are in place to ensure the safety and security of nuclear facilities and to minimize the risks associated with nuclear energy, but they can also slow down the deployment of new technologies. Public perception hurdles stem from concerns about nuclear accidents, radioactive waste, and nuclear proliferation. Events like the Chernobyl and Fukushima disasters have left lasting impressions on the public psyche, contributing to skepticism and fear surrounding nuclear power. Addressing these concerns and building public trust in the safety and reliability of nuclear technology is essential for its widespread acceptance. In the meantime, this energy capacity problem is not going away. Having said that, I still think natural gas can serve as a bridge fuel due to its relatively lower emissions compared to coal and its existing infrastructure. It can provide a reliable source of energy while efforts continue to overcome the hurdles facing nuclear power. Ultimately, achieving a sustainable energy future will likely require a diverse mix of energy sources, including renewables, nuclear, and possibly transitional fuels like natural gas. Each has its advantages and challenges, and careful consideration of these factors is crucial for making informed decisions about our energy infrastructure. 𝗧𝗵𝗲 𝗰𝗼𝘀𝘁 𝗼𝗳 𝗱𝗶𝘀𝗰𝗼𝘃𝗲𝗿𝘆 𝗶𝘀 𝘆𝗼𝘂𝗿 𝘁𝗶𝗺𝗲, 𝘁𝗵𝗲 𝗰𝗼𝘀𝘁 𝗼𝗳 𝗶𝗻𝗮𝗰𝘁𝗶𝗼𝗻 𝗺𝗮𝘆 𝗯𝗲 𝘆𝗼𝘂𝗿 𝗯𝘂𝘀𝗶𝗻𝗲𝘀𝘀. For more energy insights, follow: #EnergyNinjaChronicles Subscribe to the newsletter: 📩 https://lnkd.in/dGpq2-dC #energyinfrastructure #energymanagement #energymarkets https://lnkd.in/dJ_Rhpzv

'The media has become an echo chamber, with each outlet clambering over the next to crow about the great benefits of nuclear power in misleading language that suggests this technology is already entirely proven out.' This article clearly shows the neo-conservative championing of nuclear is basically total BS, SMR tech is literally decades away if it ever arrives. This means it is entirely reckless to suggest it is a viable solution to our current challenges in energy transition. To me this shows that the nuclear debate is really designed to take oxygen away from the renewable energy conversation. It smacks of a political strategy that isn't based on sound energy policy but instead is based on the pursuit of power for powers sake. History shows us that a willing media loves a contrary point of view and its likely they will continue to misrepresent nuclear as viable so it would be foolish to underestimate this as a viable political strategy. We have already lost a decade in a policy vacuum and Australia's transition cannot afford fanciful delusions to distract us. Lets talk about the one of the worst role outs of smart meters globally vs comparative economies, the pervasiveness of flat tariffs and the impending hot-water and EV tsunami if we want to get serious...

Happy 40th Hartlepool Nuclear Power Station 🎉 🙌 From less than a tenth of a square mile, it's produced enough clean power to light up every home in the Tees Valley for 200 years, saving 1.5 billion cubic metres of imported gas every year and producing enough electricity for more than 2 million homes every day. ✍ In his latest blog post, our Director of Policy, Lincoln Hill, reflects on the station's contribution and assesses how new nuclear projects on Teeside could usher in a revolution in industrial production in this country. "For 40 years, nuclear on Teesside has delivered exactly what we now want from a new green economy: clean power, energy security and good jobs for local people. The lesson is simple enough: build more nuclear power stations." #nuclear #Hartlepool #netzero

“…30% of the nation’s coal plants are expected to be retired by 2035, and more than 300 retired and existing coal plants are suitable for advanced #nuclear plants and technologies. This could result in $275 million in added annual economic activity in nuclear sector communities.” A “smart transition” of #energy systems required an integrated and cross-disciplinary approach across energy sectors. The cross-disciplinary expertise of colleagues in Computing at ORNL and beyond helps communities make the right energy choices to meet their needs. 💡💡💡

8 Things to Know About Converting Coal Plants to Nuclear Power https://lnkd.in/eEWitDB7 via U.S. Department of Energy (DOE) GAINnuclear #Coal2Nuclear #RepowerCoal Terra Praxis

Wow! Kairos received approval on their construction permit. Approval time only took 2 years and reactor operations may start as soon as 2026‼️ Kairos uses TRISO fuel (tiny spheres of encased fuel) and a molten salt cooling system. This combination makes it practically meltdown-proof and able to operate with minimal human intervention. All of this makes a fantastic argument for nuclear energy safety. Cost-wise I’m not sure yet how they compare with other Gen IV designs or other energy sources like renewables. Power output is 35MW (thermal) so it’ll be even less in terms of electrical output depending on efficiency. If they can beat the $/kWh of other non-nuclear systems though…it’ll become a no-brainer to deploy widespread nuclear energy in terms of cost effectiveness, safety, and reliability. Read more in the official statement: https://lnkd.in/gHeJwDKX

Interesting food for thought on a Monday! Sometimes overlooked, wanting everything to be electrified means that base load power needs to come from somewhere! To support this, the energy mix will need nuclear to play it's part in supporting the drive to electrify everything! ⚡⚡⚡ #powergeneration #nuclear #powerplant

America is poised to lead in advanced nuclear energy, but outdated regulations hinder progress. This article highlights 8 key actions to revamp our approach, reduce red tape, and accelerate deployment. What are your thoughts on #nuclearenergy? https://buff.ly/3N7adZR #cleanenergy #renewables