Hexaly’s Post

View organization page for Hexaly, graphic

10,487 followers

Hexaly against Gurobi on the Bin Packing Problem: For the 240 BPPLIB instances commonly used by the research, Hexaly achieved an average gap of 0.2% in 1 minute of running time on a standard server (8 cores, 3.8GHz). After 1 minute, the *worst* gap observed for Hexaly is 0.6%; after 10 minutes, the *worst* gap is 0.3%. After 1 minute, the *average* gap observed for Gurobi is 44%; after 10 minutes, the *average* gap is 11%. Hexaly can solve Bin Packing problems involving 1,000,000 items in minutes of running time. On the other hand, traditional MILP solvers like Gurobi struggle to find quality solutions for instances with 1,000 items. 🔗 Check the benchmark here: https://lnkd.in/eCgEWpaF #optimization #operationsresearch

Hexaly vs Gurobi on the Bin Packing Problem - Hexaly

Hexaly vs Gurobi on the Bin Packing Problem - Hexaly

hexaly.com

Philippe Olivier

PhD, Operations Research Consultant

1mo

The MILP formulation used for these benchmarks was published in 1960. The abstract of the paper linked in the article even states that it is the translation of a 1939 paper (85 years ago!). Out of curiosity, how does Hexaly compare to Gurobi when taking into account modern methods, e.g., column generation?

Like
Reply

To view or add a comment, sign in

Explore topics