Erica Campbell’s Post

View profile for Erica Campbell, graphic

Co-founder at Incommon, Building Community-First Food Systems

While farm balance sheets may currently look good on the surface, many small and medium sized farms continue to struggle. What will it take to help them thrive? One of InCommon Group's clients, The Carrot Project, is featured in this morning’s NYT article: “I think in some ways they’re in a worse position than before the pandemic,” said Benneth Phelps, executive director of the nonprofit Carrot Project, which advises small farmers in New England. “We see a lot of farmers making hard decisions right now about whether to stay in or get out, because they’ve run out of steam.” The article points out the merits of the IRA’s $20 billion in conservation funding aimed at helping farmers fight climate change and become more resilient. Additional funding from ARPA has been aimed at helping farmers, including $400 billion for the development of Regional Food Business Centers. But the sad reality is that the current draft farm bills from both the House and Senate largely maintain the status quo – bolstering big agriculture at the expense of small and medium sized operations. We need more market access for diversified and regenerative farmers, too. Our friend, Nebraska farmer Graham Christensen, was also quoted in the article: “We don’t have anywhere to go with those [high-value] products when we’re done,” Mr. Christensen said. “Those are the markets we want, and we don’t have a way to get there.” Massive reform is needed if we are to turn the curve on the declining number of farmers and the ever-increasing consolidation–and to improve consumer’s access to healthy, regenerative food.  We truly need a BIG movement to make the changes needed to ensure a resilient, deconsolidated, diversified, accessible, and abundant food system for all. https://lnkd.in/eBe9wap7.

Can Billions in New Subsidies Keep Family Farms in Business?

Can Billions in New Subsidies Keep Family Farms in Business?

https://www.nytimes.com

Troy Eckard

President at Eckard Commercial Construction & Rancher, head fence builder at Iron Springs Ranch

1mo

Subsidies just make a farmer dependent upon the government, just like taking welfare can entail a person figuring out how to live within the parameters required to continue to receive that welfare check or how to qualify for other government programs. Subsidies kill innovation and change. All subsidies should have a shelf life and then expire. No subsidies should be created just to replace an existing subsidy. If the government wants to incentivize something they should do it with tax credits (transferable if it makes sense). If you more of something subsidize it, if you want less of it then tax it. Someone said that, and it’s so true. Now we have corn subsidies and we grow corn for animal feed and ethanol for the most part and we don’t need ethanol and we certainly don’t need that much for animal feed.

Like
Reply
Judith Horvath

Regenerative farmer, agricultural consultant, entrepreneur, speaker, podcaster. Promoting clean, nutrient-dense foods right within our communities. Calling for the end of CAFOs, returning animals to pasture.

1mo

I read Austin Frerick’s book Barons and then interviewed him to gain more understanding on this topic. The US farm bill is designed to intentionally overproduce specific commodity crops. This systemic overproduction benefits the biggest players. They are active lobbyists and they’re highly effective at getting their way. The outcomes of this system are plain to see today. Complexities aside, more of the same will not get us a different outcome. To achieve meaningful change we need vastly updated models of incentives. To borrow a quote from the late Bill Mollison, our problems are increasingly complex but our solutions are embarrassingly simple.” Subsidies need to phase out. Period. It’s the only way. If they do not, we will see increased desertification, more loss of soil to erosion from over planting and loss of riparian areas, and accelerating decreases in soil fertility. Overproduction of grains thst go to CAFO meat production. I go to big farms in the Midwest and do soil tests. I’m seeing 1% organic matter, superweeds and pH in the 5s. THAT is what subsidies bring. Small farmers don’t need handouts. They need roadblocks removed. The big boys are gatekeepers and it’s by design.

Eric Fuchs

Consultant at Understanding ag

1mo

Morgan Hartman agree Morgan. We need to phase out the farm bill altogether. Government can protect our markets in much better ways. Chiefly handling the monopolies.

Morgan Hartman

Regenerative Agriculture Consultant at Understanding Ag, LLC - Experts in Regenerative Ag

1mo

Subsidies are not the answer.

See more comments

To view or add a comment, sign in

Explore topics