David Robinson’s Post

"Proteomics is the new Genomics" is a phrase I have heard several times over the past few years. Great to see more evidence supporting this bold claim!

A landmark new University of Oxford study of proteomic markers for 19 cancer types in the UK biobank by the has identified 182 proteins that may be used for early detection. Detection was done with Olink Proteomics which (antitrust permitting 😳) will soon be acquired by Thermo Fisher Scientific. I know from personal experience how careful Thermo is with M&A dollars, so they must have conviction to be paying $3.1B for Olink. Further proof (if there was any need) that the future of MCED is multiomic. (Also, in my opinion, evidence for proteomics being the next genomics as we move focus from genetic cause to clinical effect). "In this large prospective study of 1463 proteins with the risk of up to 19 cancers, we identified 371 plasma protein markers of cancer risk, including 107 that were associated with cancer diagnosed more than seven years after blood draw and many that also had support from complementary genetic analyses, which may suggest a role in aetiology. Furthermore, 182 proteins were strongly associated with diagnosis within three years, suggesting potential relevance as biomarkers for early detection."

Identifying proteomic risk factors for cancer using prospective and exome analyses of 1463 circulating proteins and risk of 19 cancers in the UK Biobank - Nature Communications

Identifying proteomic risk factors for cancer using prospective and exome analyses of 1463 circulating proteins and risk of 19 cancers in the UK Biobank - Nature Communications

nature.com

To view or add a comment, sign in

Explore topics