Dan Magy’s Post

View profile for Dan Magy, graphic

Firestorm 🏴☠️

Was a HIMARS strike successful in knocking out a $100m Russian radar? Footage released earlier this week shows a Shark UAS flying 70km behind enemy lines and finding a NEBO-SVU radar system. It then coordinates a HIMARS strike on the deployed system. So why is this a big deal? First, large surveillance and air defense radars are a key component to the air defense architecture for Russia. In modern warfare, this kind of radar is often the first to warn of approaching air threats. Second, the price to build a system reaches from the high tens of millions of dollars to a widely reported $100m. Furthermore, the technological complexity required for production combined with the state of the Russian military-industrial complex (especially given embargo on Western electronic components) means the replacement cost is far greater than just a number. #dronewars

Paul Bradley

Sales and Portfolio Director, Ballistician and Pro Shooter

1mo

Well thats $200 worth of Corn crop removed from Russian plates.

John “PK” Kelley

Orange Diamond Consulting Group, Orange Diamond Global Defense, Orange Diamond Global Sourcing, Town of Northlake Town Council Member, Living Hope Equine Therapy Board Member

1mo

Dan Magy this strike isn’t from a HIMARS. The HIMARS are much more powerful munitions than what is seen in this footage. One HIMARS launcher firing all 12 munitions can destroy one square kilometer.

Haha. I recall a time in Afghanistan when my HIMARS shot failed to defeat three dudes in the open. The missile landed dead smack in the middle of three bad guys, knocking them to the ground. I watched via aerial FMV as they stood back up, scratched their heads in confusion, and then casually carried on with the rest of their day. So dumb!

Zeeshan Shamsi

Minerals | Copper | Sustainable

1mo

This would be a himars miss, but tbh this looks like much smaller cracker than HMRS

Danny Bryant

Microwave Component Designer at Engin-IC

1mo

Did the radar (and crew) have permission to be where they were at?

Timothy D. Otten

7-year Expat | Europe International Affairs | Military | Aviation | Diplomacy | Global Leadership

1mo

Dan any s/a on the round that was used? I’d find that quite interesting given the denial and adversary threat.

Bill Edwards, CPP, PSP, PCI, CPD

Honorary Regimental Commander of the 68th Armored Regiment/President, Executive Vice President of Global Security Services

1mo

“70KM behind the FLOT”

Chris Shaub

SOF Operator (ret) | Leader | Innovator | Advanced Technologies

1mo

It’s likely bad location data was passed from the UAV by using the gimbal SPI information to provide the target grid. This is why reference system like PSS-OFF and Point Mensuration tool were created. We developed software that provides CAT I/II target accuracy from UAS gimbals. If this particular drone had it, it’s likely that HIMARS wouldn’t have missed.

Replace “Russian Radar” with “TPS-75” or “TPY-4” I hope we’re using this to inform CC&D and TTPs for future US tactical radars

See more comments

To view or add a comment, sign in

Explore topics