Daniel Pearson’s Post

View profile for Daniel Pearson, graphic

Managing Director at Action Group || Strategic Comms & Marketing || Sport, Fitness & Wellness

Looking for some #PR industry views… We recently declined to take part in a repitch as our client was looking to have its agency tackle an international brief, something we’d struggle to do at Action Group with our current structure. The client completely understood and we parted ways on great terms after 8 years of working together, and subsequently a new agency was appointed. Following this, PR Week have approached us to comment on the new agency’s win, presumably after the new agency sent a release to let them know, and then written up that we declined to comment (whilst getting the name of Action Group wrong). Am I on my own thinking this is a strange approach to take? Were they hoping we would badmouth the agency or client? Would the new agency really want a comment from me in their piece celebrating the new win? Am I overreacting to think our trade media should behave a little better?

To view or add a comment, sign in

Explore topics