Your company does NOT need middle managers to thrive 🎯 Here’s why you should opt for flat organizational structures 👇 Middle managers can be helpful. But just because something is functional doesn't mean it’s also the best or most efficient thing to do. Here are 4 examples of companies thriving without middle management: 🏥 Buurtzorg Nederland: The Dutch healthcare organization with 15,000 employees and no middle managers 🏛️ Viisi | Hypotheken: The Dutch financial firm that is moving successfully beyond Holacracy 🏤 Haier: A global appliances company headquartered in China 🏢 NER Group: A group of organizations committed to freedom and self-management The future is flat. Companies should stop thinking about how to best control their employees. Instead, they should think about how to give their people the freedom to do their best work. 💡 Learn more about flat organizational structures and working without bosses in our blog ➡️ https://lnkd.in/eYYsTAat #Management #Leadership #Hierarchy #CorporateRebels #Transformation
The image can be completely different when turned upside down. When frontline Teams are at the top of the hierarchy and everyone below them is there to support their work, knowledge, and provide motivation, it creates a new perspective. This is also a matter of decision-making authority, which should be significantly greater on the front lines because that's where problems arise, opportunities emerge, and normal life takes place far from the corporate world. In my opinion, an inverted pyramid with managers in the role of coaches is the most optimal structure. This inverted organizational structure places those closest to customers and day-to-day operations at the top, emphasizing their importance. It recognizes that frontline employees often have the most direct knowledge of products, processes, and customer needs. By positioning managers and executives as support roles, it empowers frontline workers to make more decisions and take initiative.
The myth that 'flat organisations' are the way forward concerns me. Do businesses benefit from fresh thinking around how to structure themselves and what leadership looks like? ....Absolutely yes. Do truly flat organisations work? In my experience, they promote unhealthy shadow power dynamics or limitations of consensus think. I'm fully on board with open governance, role mapping, effective meeting spaces and the like but the self management movement needs to be careful about its messaging.
This is an overly simplistic view, Corporate Rebels. A more helpful discussion could center around separating the function of middle management from the hierarchy (positions) of middle management. Taking a VSM perspective, there are three dimensions of organizing: hierarchy, function, and information & control flows. Effective middle management as a function is so much more than perpetuating power structures in the sense of traditional (scientific) management theory. These elements are also very clearly present in the self-organizing companies you write about in your blogs and book. Maybe a more apropos dialogue should focus on what essentially causes middle management to be ineffective. We might just find that most roads lead to senior executive decision making and an overreliance on abductive inference and "efficiencies of scale" thinking.
Usually really like your posts, but this one misses the mark big time. Yes, there will be businesses with a toxic culture but I know in my company that we are respected and valued and I'm inspired by my leadership.
This is an overly simplistic view of organizations, this can appear in any org. Flat or hierarchal organizations need to provide the kind of environment that fosters and stimulates innovation, dedication and a desire to succeed.
This is why clever crows place themselves on a tree wisely, not endangered by shit-rain or asshole-views... Humans could learn a lot from them!
The graphical representation is too extreme just as the opposite statement “NO middle managers” is too extreme. It all about having a “correct value proposition”. I believe there is a need for middle managers that understand the business, has the know how too identify and leverage strengths while improving, eliminating, or minimizing the effect of weaknesses. Knowing how to challenge and promote individual growth while maintaining an environment of positive, supportive, and competitive teamwork and a keen ability to give private and public accolades and constructive criticism.
Camplight | Your Digital Venture Builder is another organization on this list. We have even done away with executives and are doing quite fine.
And those are just 4 great examples of companies. The list goes on and on and on 😁
Deputy Fire Chief | Retired Marine | Lifelong Leadership Student | Public Safety Diver
3wThis is the first thing I’ve seen posted here that is misguided. The problem with this post is that it only sees one side of a hierarchical structure. When authentic leadership is achieved, all those birds open up an umbrella and deflect crap from the top. Think of a Spartan phalanx. This post represents pure management focusing only on results instead of investing in people. Many successful hierarchical structures have accomplished greatness by decentralizing authority and investing back into the teams.