Asad Zaman’s Post

More than half of the employees surveyed reported that virtual meetings “regularly” interrupt their working day. This prevents them from completing tasks and maintaining a good and healthy workflow.💪 With all of us mainly being online, this makes so much sense, and it shows us that virtual burnout is a huge thing. This article dives into why meetings should be kept short and only hosted when needed.👌 So make sure to check it out and enjoy the read!⤵️ https://buff.ly/4biYVeg #business #workfromhome #meetings #productivity

There is perhaps one thing all employees will collectively agree on: Meetings steal time, and a lot of it at once, too. The average number of meetings held every week has been steadily climbing, and that's no surprise in today's hustle culture work environment. A survey conducted by Dialpad of more than 2,800 working professionals found that around 83% of them spend between four and 12 hours per calendar week attending meetings. On average, employees end up spending 30% of their workweek attending meetings, and in some cases, these sessions are nothing but wasted hours that could've been used more productively. #digimediamatters https://lnkd.in/gZe6vmS9

📊 Unlocking Productivity: The Impact of Meeting-Free Days Revealed! 🚀 Meetings - we've all felt the drain. The surprising solution? No-meeting days. According to MIT Sloan Management Review, organizations embracing this trend have seen remarkable results. Here's the lowdown: 🔍 The Dilemma: Even before the pandemic, 71% of managers found meetings costly and unproductive. Remote work exacerbated the issue, with knowledge workers spending over 85% of their time in meetings. 🔄 The Shift: Companies like Facebook and Atlassian are adopting no-meeting days to allow for flexible collaboration, addressing the negative impact of excessive meetings on well-being. 📈 The Impact: Surveying 76 companies, introducing two no-meeting days per week reduced meetings by 40%. The outcome? A 71% boost in productivity! Three meeting-free days led to even better results, improving autonomy, cooperation, and engagement. 📉 Diminishing Returns: While a no-meeting approach works wonders, the sweet spot is three meeting-free days. Beyond that, satisfaction, productivity, engagement, and cooperation decline. 🛠️ Implementation Tips: Connect with your team: Gather feedback before making changes. Encourage informality: Allow space for informal interactions to foster social connections. Practice better meeting hygiene: Set ground rules, ensure clear agendas, and assign roles. ⚖️ The Balance: Optimal meeting-free days? Three per week. This leaves two days for social connections and managing schedules. https://buff.ly/3tyvN0x Ready to reclaim time and boost productivity? Share your thoughts on implementing no-meeting days in the comments! 🚀🗓️ #Productivity #RemoteWork #WorkplaceWellbeing #Leadership

How do you make your meetings more productive and meaningful?

A recent survey has revealed that nearly three quarters of British professionals believe virtual meetings hinder their productivity, raising concerns about “virtual burnout.” More than half of the professionals surveyed reported that virtual meetings “regularly” interrupt their working day, preventing them from completing their tasks. A significant portion of respondents, 25%, said they have five or more online meetings daily, while a third reported up to four. With each meeting averaging around 30 minutes, employees could be losing as much as two and a half hours of their working day to video calls. Are virtual meetings hindering your productivity? Share your comments below. 👇 ”https://lnkd.in/eJrKk2-a #Workplace #Virtualmeetings #Productivity

𝗪𝗵𝗮𝘁 𝘁𝗵𝗲 𝗽𝗮𝗿𝘁𝗶𝗰𝗶𝗽𝗮𝘁𝗶𝗼𝗻 𝗶𝗻 𝘆𝗼𝘂𝗿 𝗭𝗼𝗼𝗺 𝗺𝗲𝗲𝘁𝗶𝗻𝗴𝘀 𝗺𝗶𝗴𝗵𝘁 𝗯𝗲 𝘁𝗲𝗹𝗹𝗶𝗻𝗴 𝘆𝗼𝘂. In the Harvard Business Review article, No, Remote Employees Aren’t Becoming Less Engaged, Andrew Brodsky and Mike Tolliver explore how employee engagement and meetings have evolved through and after the pandemic. Here are some key insights: • 𝗜𝗻𝗰𝗿𝗲𝗮𝘀𝗲 𝗶𝗻 𝗠𝗲𝗲𝘁𝗶𝗻𝗴𝘀: There were 60% more remote meetings per employee in 2022 compared to 2020, increasing from 5 to 8 meetings. • 𝗦𝗵𝗼𝗿𝘁𝗲𝗿 𝗠𝗲𝗲𝘁𝗶𝗻𝗴𝘀: Since 2020, the length of remote meetings has decreased by 25%, from 43 minutes to 33 minutes. • 𝗦𝗺𝗮𝗹𝗹𝗲𝗿 𝗠𝗲𝗲𝘁𝗶𝗻𝗴𝘀: The average number of participants per meeting dropped from 20 to 10 between 2020 and 2022. • 𝗦𝗽𝗼𝗻𝘁𝗮𝗻𝗲𝗼𝘂𝘀 𝗠𝗲𝗲𝘁𝗶𝗻𝗴𝘀: In 2020, 17% of one-on-one meetings were unscheduled; this rose to 66% in 2022. • 𝗗𝗲𝗽𝗮𝗿𝘁𝘂𝗿𝗲 𝗜𝗻𝗱𝗶𝗰𝗮𝘁𝗼𝗿𝘀: Employees who left had 67% fewer spontaneous meetings, 22% fewer scheduled meetings, and 20% fewer group meetings leading up to their departure. In a related Harvard Business Review article, Hybrid Work Has Changed Meetings Forever, Mike Tolliver and Jonathan Sass discuss how meeting engagement and participation correlate to employee retention. Here are some key insights: • 𝗣𝗿𝗲-𝗽𝗮𝗻𝗱𝗲𝗺𝗶𝗰 𝗠𝗲𝗲𝘁𝗶𝗻𝗴𝘀: 77.6% of meetings were face-to-face. • 𝗠𝗲𝗲𝘁𝗶𝗻𝗴 𝗙𝗿𝗲𝗾𝘂𝗲𝗻𝗰𝘆: Employees attended an average of 8.3 meetings per week in 2021, 10.32 in 2022, and 10.1 in 2023. • 𝗡𝗼-𝗣𝗮𝗿𝘁𝗶𝗰𝗶𝗽𝗮𝘁𝗶𝗼𝗻 𝗥𝗮𝘁𝗲𝘀: 7.2% in 2023, up from 4.8% in 2022. No-participation is defined as staying muted and not engaging during meetings. • 𝗘𝗺𝗽𝗹𝗼𝘆𝗲𝗲 𝗥𝗲𝘁𝗲𝗻𝘁𝗶𝗼𝗻: No-participation rates are 9.6% for those who leave versus 7.1% for those who stay. • 𝗖𝗮𝗺𝗲𝗿𝗮 𝗨𝘀𝗮𝗴𝗲: Increased meeting fatigue correlates with more disabled cameras, impacting employee retention. Workers who leave their jobs have their cameras on only 18.4% of the time, compared to 32.5% for those who stay. To address these issues, it's essential to treat meeting culture as a crucial part of company culture. Reducing unnecessary meetings and fostering engagement can improve productivity and employee satisfaction. 𝗞𝗲𝘆 𝗧𝗮𝗸𝗲𝗮𝘄𝗮𝘆𝘀: • Encourage active participation in online meetings. • Reduce unnecessary meetings. • Foster a culture of engagement to improve employee retention. • Monitor meeting participation as an indicator of employee satisfaction and potential turnover. 𝗟𝗶𝗻𝗸 𝘁𝗼 𝗔𝗿𝘁𝗶𝗰𝗹𝗲𝘀: • Hybrid Work Has Changed Meetings Forever - Erica Volini and Beth Schwarting, Harvard Business Review: https://lnkd.in/gUxK3CHR • No, Remote Employees Aren’t Becoming Less Engaged - Andrew Brodsky and Mike Tolliver, Harvard Business Review: https://lnkd.in/g4YuBH57

Hot Take: No Meeting Day is the Antidote to the Productivity Poison We've All Been Drinking ? The siren song of No Meeting Day has captivated workers weary of calendar tyranny. But before we all ditch our invites and dive headfirst into a meeting-free utopia, let's crack open this concept and examine its potential pitfalls alongside its promised paradise. Productivity Nirvana or Efficiency Evaporator? Proponents hail No Meeting Day as a deep work oasis, boosting focus and output. Unchained from the agenda chain, knowledge workers morph into productivity powerhouses, churning out high-quality work with laser-like precision. Studies even whisper of 25% productivity gains – enough to make any spreadsheet-loving manager swoon. But hold your horses, efficiency enthusiasts. Critics counter that replacing meetings with asynchronous communication (think emails and Slack) can create its own kind of chaos. Information silos sprout, decisions stall, and that crucial spark of real-time collaboration flickers and dies. Is No Meeting Day a recipe for focused flow or a communication graveyard? Collaboration Conundrum: Friend or Foe? While meetings can be productivity vampires, they also play a vital role in team cohesion and shared understanding. The casual water cooler chat, the spontaneous brainstorming session – these unscripted moments can be the breeding ground for innovation and connection. Can No Meeting Day replicate these intangible benefits, or will it leave teams feeling isolated and adrift? The Verdict: Nuance Reigns Supreme No Meeting Day isn't a binary choice between paradise and purgatory. It's a nuanced dance between focus and collaboration, asynchronous communication and shared understanding. The ideal approach likely lies somewhere in the middle, a bespoke blend of meeting-free zones and strategic, well-designed gatherings. So, should we toss the calendar and declare war on meetings? No. But let's use No Meeting Day as a catalyst for rethinking how we work together. Embrace the deep work, yes, but don't neglect the power of human connection. Find the sweet spot where focus fuels collaboration, and productivity truly takes flight. Remember, a hot take thrives on sparking debate, not providing definitive answers. So, join the conversation! Share your thoughts on No Meeting Day – is it a productivity panacea or a communication purgatory? Let's find the sweet spot together, and create a work environment that's both productive and fulfilling. #NoMeetingDay #RisingAhead #BSA #ProductivityRemix #WorkReimagined #ProductivityRevolution #DeepWork #WorkLifeBalance #MeetingMadness

Meetings getting you down? You're not alone! 😩 A recent survey found meetings are the #1 productivity killer. But eliminating them isn't the answer - improving them is. 💡 Here are some tips: 🚫 Only hold meetings that have a clear purpose and agenda. Skip ones that don't. ⏰ Shorten meeting length and limit attendees. 📝 Use collaboration tools for updates vs meetings. 🎥 Allow remote folks to keep cameras off to reduce fatigue. 🏃♀️ Try walking or standing meetings to energize attendees. 😴 Audit meeting frequency and cancel redundancies. With some tweaks, we can boost productivity and end meeting fatigue! 😌 Learn more from SHRM at https://buff.ly/3sUUcPq #performanceimprovement #performanceculture #corporateculture #improvingperformanceatwork #companyculture #businessculture #employeeperformance #HR #humanresources

Endless meetings aren't just crushing productivity — they're also costing companies thousands of dollars. One employer's new calendar tool, which calculates for staff how much each meeting costs, is the latest move among businesses to slash waste in the era of remote work — and keep employees happy. "If you turn my day into Swiss cheese, where I can't find a two hour block to do heads-down work, then all of my core work, my job, gets shoved into the evenings, after the kids are in bed and after dinner," Brian Elliott, an executive advisor on the future of work, told Axios. "I'm probably already burnt out from the day of meetings and interruptions that I've had and probably not at my best," he added. U.S. companies spend tens of billions of dollars each year on company-wide gatherings, and if done incorrectly these meetings can be a huge waste of time and resources, Axios' Eleanor Hawkins writes. Unnecessary meetings can eat up to $100 million per year for large companies, according to a UNC-Otter.ai survey published last year. The big picture: Elliott, the workplace consultant, said schedule flexibility — more than location flexibility — has a huge impact on worker productivity. More focus time allows them to "do higher quality and better work" and affects "intent to stay, employee engagement, employee activation around the organization," he said.

NO MEETING FRIDAYS - It's a THING! Even before the pandemic, 71% of managers thought meetings were costly and unproductive. Since many companies have shifted to remote and hybrid workplace models, meetings have steadily increased in frequency and length to compensate for the loss of in-person interactions. Today’s knowledge workers typically spend more than 85% of their time in meetings, which studies show negatively affects people’s psychological, physical, and mental well-being. https://lnkd.in/e7hDqfSu