Antony Demekhin’s Post

Major music industry organizations file lawsuits against generative AI firms for copyright infringement and exploitation. Several major record labels and music industry groups have filed lawsuits against AI companies Suno and Udio, alleging copyright infringement and exploitation. These web-based startups, promoted as artificial intelligence song generators, are accused of using copyrighted music owned by the labels to train their AI technology. Suno and Udio allow users to input text prompts to generate full songs from their sound libraries. However, according to the lawsuits, these companies are accused of using copyrighted music to flood the market with machine-generated content, which could undermine and devalue authentic recordings on which their services are based. The lawsuits seek compensation of $150,000 per infringed work, claiming that Suno and Udio's software appropriates music to create similar compositions. The Recording Industry Association of America announced the legal action, with major labels such as Sony Music Entertainment, Universal Music Group Recordings, and Warner Records among those involved. Several well-known songs and artists are cited as evidence. Mitch Glazier, Chairman and CEO of the trade body, criticized Suno and Udio, stating, "Unlicensed services like Suno and Udio that assert it's 'fair' to copy an artist's life's work and profit from it without consent or compensation undermine the potential for truly innovative AI for everyone." Suno, which launched in 2022 and has partnered with Microsoft, charges users a monthly fee. Udio, which gained attention last April when US producer Metro Boomin used it to create the viral parody 'BBL Drizzy,' raised $10 million from investors and celebrities. In contrast, Suno received $125 million in venture capital funding in May, marking a record investment in a music AI startup. Neither company has disclosed the origins of their training data publicly, leading experts to suspect they are using copyrighted music without permission. Mikey Shulman, AI chief executive at Suno, told The Guardian that their software is intended to generate entirely new outputs and does not allow users to reference specific artists. Artificial intelligence remains a contentious issue in the music industry. In May, a parliamentary group urged the UK government to advance regulations on AI and artist protections. Additionally, over 200 artists, including Billie Eilish, Nicki Minaj, and Katy Perry, signed an open letter in April protesting the "predatory" use of AI-generated music. While some artists, like Steve Aoki, have expressed acceptance of AI-produced music, acknowledging the need for evolving safeguards, the debate over AI's role in music creation continues to evolve. What are your thoughts on AI's impact on music creation and artist rights? Join the conversation below! #MusicIndustry #CopyrightInfringement #AIinMusic #ArtistRights #InnovationDebate

Donemus signs the Declaration of Music Rights for Legal and Fair AI Creativity & technology have always been natural fits, working interchangeably to mutual benefit. Today, this combination makes hundreds of millions of music tracks available online, at the touch of a button, to a global audience of billions. Copyright laws are the crucial cornerstone of this modern, digital market. They help bring the world’s music to a global audience, protect the rights of creators and the rightsholders that support them, enable compensation to be paid for use of works and safeguard a sustainable future for human creativity and culture. AI has long been a feature of the music sector. However, some AI company developments and uses have not been ethical, responsible, or compliant with copyright laws or other legal requirements. In response, there are several initiatives from those who make, care about or defend music, calling for a fairer AI future. The Human Artistry Campaign champions the vital nature of human created music and is backed by organisations worldwide. Fairlytrained.org certifies Generative AI companies that observe copyright laws when training Large Language Models and developing AI. Ethical, responsible and lawful AI development that respects copyright and other laws and principles such as data protection, privacy and personality rights is essential for this powerful technology to evolve in a way that benefits society. AI companies who seek to misuse copyright exceptions such as those available for ‘Text and Data Mining’ (TDM) or ‘Fair Use’ to access the world’s music for AI training, including for the creation of Generative AI products and services without a licence cause significant harm to everyone who has worked so hard to make that music available. When it comes to copyright exceptions, conditions need to be satisfied. For example, companies and services seeking to rely on a TDM exception must first have “lawful access” to the copyright-protected material. It is clear that any indiscriminate or wholesale ‘scraping’ of online music or other protected content means, by definition, accessing that music or content from unlicensed sources and from services that are only licensed to provide music to individual fans for private and non-commercial use. Such scraping does not count as “lawful access” to the music. AI companies can ensure ethical and responsible AI by securing appropriate licences in advance from relevant rightsholders, not cutting corners at the expense of the world’s songwriters, artists, rightsholders and consumers. AI companies should never ignore rights aiming to accelerate their tech developments or commercial growth...

Why Major Record Labels Are Suing AI Music Generators https://ift.tt/hpiI5ad In what promises to be one of the first—of potentially many—major showdowns between AI tech companies and music rights holders, as well as and other copyright-protected arts, we’re watching in real-time as the world begins to define what AI is going to be allowed—and not allowed—to do. With a focus on training and how AI models have trained their own models and algorithms on music and art created not by computers, we have news that the Recording Industry Association of America and record labels are suing AI music generators over copyright infringement claims. Let’s look a bit at this ongoing debate and explore what it could mean for the future of not just music for video, but filmmaking and video more specifically as well. Record Labels Suing AI Music Generators Led by a group of music labels including Universal Music Group, Warner Music Group, and Sony Music Group, this coalition has filed lawsuits in US federal court alleging copyright infringement on a massive scale—most notably by AI music generator companies Suno and Udio. As we’ve seen with the rise of AI in all types of creative arts from graphics and video, music has been one of the many frontiers in which AI has promised to completely revolutionize. We’ve seen music-gen AI technology pop up over the past year which has promised the ability to get fully AI-generated tracks based on simple text prompts. And, in theory, this does seem like the next logical step for the budding royalty-free music for the video world to embrace, as it does feel quite similar to the way in which AI image and video models work. However, as we’re quickly learning, the training materials are key here. What the Future Holds The lawsuit has just been filed so we’ll have to wait and see how this latest suit plays out, but it does look to be a pretty big step for such major labels to be making a statement about protecting their artists’ works. It also is a bit of an offensive play, perhaps, to suss out more information about where these AI companies are getting their training materials from—which most companies have not shared much info about at all. We’ll see what comes next, but for now, we can assume that these lawsuits are going to be coming more often as these conversations and debates continue on. It’s a bold new world, and there’s a lot of scrambling left to do for everyone to make sense of what this future is ultimately going to look like. via No Film School https://ift.tt/Mi879fI June 27, 2024 at 10:03AM

The music industry is taking legal action against AI, as major labels 🏢 Universal Music Group, Sony and Warner Music Group sue 🤖 AI music generators Suno and Udio for copyright infringement. The Recording Industry Association of America® (RIAA) alleges these companies have copied copyrighted music without permission to train their AI models, resulting in lawsuits 🏛️ in Boston and New York courts. Five key takeaways: 1. 🎼 Unauthorized Copying:Suno and Udio allegedly used copyrighted music for AI training without obtaining rights. 2. 💰 Commercial Exploitation:The AI-generated music is being sold, which intensifies the infringement claims. 3. ⚖️ Fair Use Defense:Both companies assert their actions are protected under 'fair use', which the RIAA contests. 4. 🕵️ Lack of Transparency:The RIAA accuses the companies of not disclosing details about their data usage. 5. 🎸 Industry Impact:The lawsuits highlight conflicts between established music rights and emerging AI technologies. Implications for other GenAI use cases: This legal dispute emphasizes the need for clear copyright guidelines in AI development. Financial institutions using GenAI for tasks like risk assessment, fraud detection, and customer service must ensure they have proper licenses for any data used in training their models. This case underscores the importance of transparency and ethical practices to avoid potential legal challenges and maintain trust.

Shades of Napster: The RIAA, Sony music, Warner Music, and Universal Music band together to start detroying AI startup that use copyright infringement of these companies' song. And they came prepared. Is Microsoft still wiling to cover the legal fees and damages of copyright infringing Ai startups? Because The RIAA is ready to push for $99 Mil and $250 Mil against these two startups. I can't wait till the MPAA goes after the AI video startups in the same way. ---- TheVerge: "Major record labels sue AI company behind ‘BBL Drizzy’/ Citing ‘en masse’ copyright infringement, the RIAA and labels sued Udio, the company behind the hit track, and Suno, an AI music company with a Microsoft partnership. A group of record labels including the big three — Universal Music Group (UMG), Sony Music Entertainment, and Warner Records — are suing two of the top names in generative AI music making, alleging the companies violated their copyright “en masse.” The two AI companies, Suno and Udio, use text prompts to churn out original songs. Both companies have enjoyed a level of success: Suno is available for use in Microsoft Copilot though a partnership with the tech giant. Udio was used to create “BBL Drizzy,” one of the more notable examples of AI music going viral. The case against Suno was filed in Boston federal court, and the Udio case was filed in New York. The labels say artists across genres and eras had their work used without consent. The lawsuits were brought by the Recording Industry Association of America (RIAA), the powerful group representing major players in the music industry, and a group of labels. The RIAA is seeking damages of up to $150,000 per work, along with other fees. “These are straightforward cases of copyright infringement involving unlicensed copying of sound recordings on a massive scale. Suno and Udio are attempting to hide the full scope of their infringement rather than putting their services on a sound and lawful footing,” RIAA chief legal officer Ken Doroshow said in a press release. In its complaints, RIAA included several examples of outputs generated using Suno and Udio that sound like songs owned by labels. One song generated by Suno titled “Deep down in Louisiana close to New Orle” [sic] replicates the lyrics and style of “Johnny B. Goode” by Chuck Berry. Another song called “Prancing Queen” generated using the prompt “70s pop” contains lyrics to “Dancing Queen” by ABBA — and sounds remarkably like the band. The suits are a significant step in the contentious fight between the music industry and the technology companies offering AI tools. UMG and other music publishers previously sued Anthropic for distributing copyrighted song lyrics when users prompted the Claude 2 system. (keep reading) (The Verge has the full lawsuit embedded) The Verge: https://lnkd.in/essMHzc8 #ai #fakeai #genai #degenai #generativeai #degenartiveai #aiscams #ailegal

Major music labels sue AI startups over copyright infringement - https://lnkd.in/gFDChKtq Some of the world's major music labels are suing music generation services Suno and Udio, accusing the startups of violating the copyrights of top artists to train their generative AI engines without permission. Sony Music Entertainment, Warner Records, Capitol Records and others -- who filed the copyright infringement suits on Monday in federal courts in Boston and New York -- are seeking damages of up to $150,000 per song or shares of the companies' profits. "Unlicensed services like Suno and Udio that claim it's 'fair' to copy an artist's life's work and exploit it for their own profit without consent or pay set back the promise of genuinely innovative AI for us all," Recording Industry Association of America (RIAA) chief executive Mitch Glazier said in a statement. Examples cited in the lawsuits included prompts using Suno's service to churn out songs mimicking copyrighted works of Chuck Berry, James Brown, Michael Buble, ABBA, and others. Suno and Udio did not respond to requests for comment. Breaching ownership rights of people's artistic creations to train generative AI models has been a flashpoint as the technology races to become more capable and, ultimately, more profitable. The two lawsuits, one against each company, center on generative AI services that allow people to make songs using basic prompts. Suno and Udio have been evasive about how they train their AI models, saying that is a guarded secret, according to the complaints. Music publishers are collaborating with "responsible developers" to build AI tools that respect the works of artists, according to the head of the RIAA, which announced the lawsuits. "Real music comes from real life and real people," Black Music Action Coalition chief executive Willie "Prophet" Stiggers said in the release. "It is vital that artists and songwriters are in charge of their own work, story, and message." In April, hundreds of artists and songwriters including Billie Eilish, Smokey Robinson and the estate of Frank Sinatra signed an open letter urging protections against what they called an "assault on human creativity" posed by artificial intelligence. "We must protect against the predatory use of AI to steal professional artists' voices and likenesses, violate creators' rights, and destroy the music ecosystem," read the letter, submitted by the non-profit Artist Rights Alliance. © 2024 AFP Source

 𝐖𝐨𝐫𝐥𝐝'𝐬 𝐋𝐚𝐫𝐠𝐞𝐬𝐭 𝐌𝐮𝐬𝐢𝐜 𝐋𝐚𝐛𝐞𝐥𝐬 𝐓𝐞𝐚𝐦 𝐔𝐩 𝐀𝐠𝐚𝐢𝐧𝐬𝐭 𝐀𝐈 𝐌𝐮𝐬𝐢𝐜 𝐆𝐞𝐧𝐞𝐫𝐚𝐭𝐨𝐫𝐬 🎶 In a groundbreaking move, major recording labels like Sony, Warner Brothers, and Universal have joined forces to wage war against AI music generators. This landmark lawsuit, organized by the Recording Industry Association of America (RIAA), targets Uncharted Labs and Suno, two AI startups accused of infringing on copyrighted music to train their AI systems. 𝐊𝐞𝐲 𝐇𝐢𝐠𝐡𝐥𝐢𝐠𝐡𝐭𝐬: 1.Major Players Involved: The lawsuit includes some of the biggest names in the music industry, such as Sony, Warner Brothers, and Universal, along with the RIAA. 2. AI Startups Under Fire: Uncharted Labs, founded by former Google DeepMind employees, and Suno, in partnership with Microsoft, are at the center of the controversy. 3. Claims of Copyright Infringement: The record labels allege that these AI generators stole copyrighted music to train their systems, demanding takedowns, admissions of infringement, and hefty fines. 𝐓𝐡𝐞 𝐍𝐞𝐞𝐝 𝐟𝐨𝐫 𝐀𝐈 𝐚𝐧𝐝 𝐂𝐨𝐩𝐲𝐫𝐢𝐠𝐡𝐭 𝐑𝐞𝐠𝐮𝐥𝐚𝐭𝐢𝐨𝐧 The rapid advancement of AI in creative fields has brought significant challenges to traditional copyright laws. • Protection of Intellectual Property: Artists and creators deserve recognition and compensation for their work. AI systems trained on copyrighted material without permission undermine these rights. • Encouraging Innovation: Clear regulations can foster innovation by providing a framework within which AI developers can operate without fear of legal repercussions. • Balancing Interests: Effective regulation balances the rights of creators with the benefits of technological advancements, ensuring that both can thrive. 𝐂𝐮𝐫𝐫𝐞𝐧𝐭 𝐀𝐈 𝐚𝐧𝐝 𝐂𝐨𝐩𝐲𝐫𝐢𝐠𝐡𝐭 𝐑𝐞𝐠𝐮𝐥𝐚𝐭𝐢𝐨𝐧𝐬: Traditional copyright laws protect original works of authorship, including music, literature, and art. These laws, however, often do not explicitly address AI-generated content. Fair Use Doctrine allows limited use of copyrighted material without permission under certain conditions, such as for commentary, criticism, or educational purposes. Its application to AI training data is still a gray area. Countries and international bodies are beginning to address AI and copyright, but there is no unified global standard yet. How should copyright laws adapt to the rise of AI-generated content? With Law Consultech #AIMusic #CopyrightLaw #MusicIndustry #AIRegulation #Innovation #Technology #ArtificialIntelligence #IntellectualProperty #CreativeIndustries #FutureOfMusic #WithLaw #WithLawConsultech #WithLawPeople #learnWithLaw https://lnkd.in/dSwmBs2D Disclaimer: The Content in this post is for informational purposes only derived from references and does not constitute any professional advice. We do not claim ownership of any data or Information referenced

Major music labels sue AI startups over copyright infringement - https://lnkd.in/gFDChKtq Some of the world's major music labels are suing music generation services Suno and Udio, accusing the startups of violating the copyrights of top artists to train their generative AI engines without permission. Sony Music Entertainment, Warner Records, Capitol Records and others -- who filed the copyright infringement suits on Monday in federal courts in Boston and New York -- are seeking damages of up to $150,000 per song or shares of the companies' profits. "Unlicensed services like Suno and Udio that claim it's 'fair' to copy an artist's life's work and exploit it for their own profit without consent or pay set back the promise of genuinely innovative AI for us all," Recording Industry Association of America (RIAA) chief executive Mitch Glazier said in a statement. Examples cited in the lawsuits included prompts using Suno's service to churn out songs mimicking copyrighted works of Chuck Berry, James Brown, Michael Buble, ABBA, and others. Suno and Udio did not respond to requests for comment. Breaching ownership rights of people's artistic creations to train generative AI models has been a flashpoint as the technology races to become more capable and, ultimately, more profitable. The two lawsuits, one against each company, center on generative AI services that allow people to make songs using basic prompts. Suno and Udio have been evasive about how they train their AI models, saying that is a guarded secret, according to the complaints. Music publishers are collaborating with "responsible developers" to build AI tools that respect the works of artists, according to the head of the RIAA, which announced the lawsuits. "Real music comes from real life and real people," Black Music Action Coalition chief executive Willie "Prophet" Stiggers said in the release. "It is vital that artists and songwriters are in charge of their own work, story, and message." In April, hundreds of artists and songwriters including Billie Eilish, Smokey Robinson and the estate of Frank Sinatra signed an open letter urging protections against what they called an "assault on human creativity" posed by artificial intelligence. "We must protect against the predatory use of AI to steal professional artists' voices and likenesses, violate creators' rights, and destroy the music ecosystem," read the letter, submitted by the non-profit Artist Rights Alliance. © 2024 AFP Source

Recently, the world's three major record companies, Universal Music, SONY Music and Warner Music, sued artificial intelligence (AI) music technology companies Udio and Suno, saying that they use the content of record companies to train AI systems to generate music, and large-scale copyright infringement. The core of the record companies' lawsuit against AI Music companies is the allegation that these companies are using their music content for AI model training without authorization, which goes to the heart of copyright law - not to copy or derivative the work of others without permission. For record companies, this is a necessary action to protect artists' creative rights and the company's investment. AI music companies, on the other hand, may see their technology as an innovative application that can push the boundaries of the music industry and create new art forms and business opportunities. The copyright issue of AI-generated content is currently a relatively new and complex legal issue across the globe. The existing copyright legal system is mostly built on the basis of human creation, and there is still a lack of clear regulations and consensus on how to define the originality and ownership of the content generated by algorithms, and how to legally use the training data. The platform can be built through .com and .top domain names to record the important course of AI development. The lawsuit also reflects the challenges the music industry faces in its digital transformation. With the development of AI technology, the way music is produced and distributed is changing, and traditional record labels may feel threatened by technological innovators, fearing loss of market control and profit sources. The outcome of this case may serve as an important precedent for similar cases in the future, not only affecting the AI music field, but also potentially affecting all industries that rely on machine learning and big data analysis to generate content, such as literature, journalism, movies, etc. It may prompt the revision and improvement of relevant laws to adapt to the new trend of technological development.

Sounds Great at it is. Time to reaffirm the advantages of working with MUSICO Deepening the Human Element in MUSI-CO's AI Development The Human Element in MUSI-CO's AI Development A significant aspect of our approach is the involvement of human composers in designing our MIDI datasets for the #ML training. At MUSI-CO, we value the human chain in AI, recognizing that there is no AI without human designers at all levels. By hiring skilled human composers to create and refine our MIDI Music datasets, we ensure a high (controlled) level of originality and creativity in the AI-generated music. This human involvement is crucial not only for the current state of AI music but also for paving the road for future music rights and advancements in AI-generated content. We are also diligently improving a #noveltymeasure to ensure that we can quantify the originality introduced by human agents adopting our generative techs. This metric will help us validate the unique contributions of our human collaborators and ensure that the generated music maintains a high standard of #creativity and #innovation. #aiusability