A new term, MEI—Merit, Excellence, Intelligence—
has recently emerged, carrying with it exclusionary implications, oversimplifications, and perpetuating the myth of meritocracy.
Exclusionary Implications:
Emphasizing merit, excellence, and intelligence can inadvertently perpetuate elitism and exclusion.
These terms, often defined by dominant cultural norms, can reinforce existing biases and marginalize those who do not fit these narrow criteria.
For example, the tech industry frequently lauds merit and intelligence, yet studies show that Black and LatinE individuals are significantly underrepresented due to systemic biases and lack of access to opportunities. This focus on MEI can further entrench such disparities.
Oversimplification:
DEI recognizes the intricate and intersecting nature of identity and systemic oppression.
MEI, however, oversimplifies these complex issues by ignoring the structural barriers that DEI aims to dismantle.
Meritocracy Myth:
The concept of meritocracy assumes a level playing field, where success is solely based on individual abilities.
However, systemic inequalities mean that opportunities are not equally accessible.
For example, in the corporate world, leadership positions are often awarded based on subjective assessments of "merit," which are influenced by biases.
As a result, people from historically marginalized groups are overlooked, not because they lack ability, but because they lack access to the same networks and resources. This makes "merit" a flawed measure of potential and achievement.
#mei #dei #inclusion
Publisher of “Accessibility in the News" - Knowledge is Power, the free industry leading newsletter
3wThank you!