Anita B. McBride’s Post

💼 Katherine Clark Scarborough: Shaping the Future of Conservative Politics in America 🇺🇸 Explore the career, achievements, and political philosophy of this rising conservative figure who is making waves in American politics. 🌐 Click the link to gain insights into her leadership style, policy positions, and the potential impact she could have on the nation's political landscape. #KatherineClarkScarborough #ConservativeLeadership #PoliticalInfluencer #EmergingLeaders #ShapingAmerica'sFuture

I am happy to be writing something from my professional life rather than the struggles of my personal life (and the lives of so many in my region) resulting from Beryl. Importantly, don't take this post as an endorsement or support of a candidate or party. It is the analysis of a political scientist. Nothing more. Why did Trump pick a very green GOP Senator from Ohio, J.D. Vance, to be his running mate this year? If you aren't too acquainted with politics, Trump has made a calculated choice to balance the ticket so that it is more attractive to voters he needs to win over, especially critical swing states, in order to win the presidency. Here is what Senator Vance offers Trump: ✅ Age - Vance is 39 while former President Trump is 78. If Trump wins in 2024, Vance would be the frontrunner in 2028. At 43, he would be one of the youngest nominees in history and would be sure to carry the Trump policies forward for a new generation. It will also allay some concerns in Trump's own party about the former president's age and if a VP selection would be ready to replace him. ✅ Geography - Vance is born and raised in the Rust Belt. Ohio, Pennsylvania, and Michigan are critical for Trump in this election and Vance brings authentic lineage from this region to help him in the close states. ✅ Conversion - Vance was an early "Never-Trumper," even speculating that Trump might be "America's Hitler" early in 2016. His story of being converted to being a supporter will ring true with some folks who are unhappy with how things are and have had their own skepticism. ✅ Media-Readiness - Vance is nationally recognized for his award-winning biography with extensive experience handling the media, both from his touring as an author and as a regular on the conservative media circles. He plays well on TV without landing as angry and sounding violent. ✅ Can likely parry with VP Harris - Vance is smart and highly-educated; as is Vice President Harris. He debates well and can potentially neutralize some of Harris's debate skill. ✅ Military Service - Trump's issues with bone spurs and his comments about those who died storming the beaches of Normandy don't play well. Vance's military service has not been questioned as being honorable. This helps offset some of the narrative around Trump. ✅ Good Story - If you haven't read Hillbilly Elegy, you should if you want to understand why Vance is such a compelling partner for Trump. While he is in the elite now, economically, politically, and educationally, he comes from poverty and has a strong claim on the American Dream. His story plays really well in writing and on TV, as it should. It is a good story. #JDVance #Election2024 Compared to the other people on the so-called short-list, Vance is the most obvious selection for the former president. He is camera-ready, a gifted storyteller with a good story, and he brings electoral appeal in critical states. This was a smart decision by Trump and his team.

"Stewart is himself a strange guide to politics. In many ways, he is the ultimate British insider". For our latest journal, Miles Bennington, reviews Rory Stewart’s book, Politics on the Edge: A Memoir from Within. Read more here: https://lnkd.in/ez_u7J-7 #politics #government #parliament #conservativeparty #bookreview #uk #ukpolitics

Who are the most over rated Presidents vs. the most under rated. A recent study surveyed conservative historians as to who were over rated and under rated presidents. This is not talking about who were the best. As the article below points out Washington and Lincoln are highly rated and justifiably so. Topping the list as over rated is Obama while Calvin Coolidge tops the under rated since his economic policies produced the roaring 20's prosperity. Trump finished second in that category, although Trump finished in the over rated top ten too! Bill Clinton was mentioned in both categories as well. JFK, FDR and Biden were in the top ten in the over rated category. As I read the article it seemed to align with my thinking. A look back by historians a 100 years after the fact often eliminates the hype and hysteria of the time and more objectivness can be applied to most all situations. This is so true in my opinion with FDR. Some would argue that without the war FDR's policies would have cratered the country, much as Biden has done. FDR's packing the SCOTUS, or trying to, depending on your perspective to his expanding government's reach into the every day citizen's decision making through regulation created by an unelected bureacracy produces FDR as not a great president in my opinion. There have been surveys in the past listing the best and worse presidents and I will add my own top five in each category. Largely for their policies' affect on the country and its citizens. I won't get into my reasoning now, it is just my conclusion from a review of their impact on the USA -- my list: Best - Washington, Jefferson, Lincoln, Andrew Jackson and Reagan Worse - Carter, Obama, Biden, FDR and Andrew Johnson I am sure you have your own view and reasoning. Let's hear it! #overratedpresidents #underratedpresidents #surveys #politics #opinions https://lnkd.in/eS4TwBNJ

Back at it with Jonathan L. Wharton, Ph.D. on this Presidents Day! Check out our article for CT News Junkie on America's aging politics.

Here are The Epoch Times' 5 takeaways from the debate👇

Republican National Committee, you should read this. "I was surprised to learn, in Levitsky and Ziblatt’s new book, “Tyranny of the Minority,” that they were shocked by Jan. 6. Though they’ve studied violent insurrections all over the world, they write in this new book, “we never imagined we’d see them here. Nor did we ever imagine that one of America’s two major parties would turn away from democracy in the 21st century.” What astonished them the most, Levitsky told me in an interview last week, “was the speed and the degree to which the Republican Party Trumpized.” In “How Democracies Die,” he and Ziblatt had reproved Republicans for failing to stop Trump’s rise to power. But at the time, he said, “we didn’t consider or call the Republican Party an authoritarian party. We did not expect it to transform so quickly and so thoroughly.” “Tyranny of the Minority” is their attempt to make sense of how American democracy eroded so fast. “Societal diversity, cultural backlash and extreme-right parties are ubiquitous across established Western democracies,” they write. But in recent years, only in America has a defeated leader attempted a coup. And only in America is the coup leader likely to once again be the nominee of a major party. “Why did America, alone among rich established democracies, come to the brink?” they ask." READ: https://lnkd.in/dtPUnEtD #minorityrule #republicanparty #authoritarianism #howdemocraciesdie #societalimpact #jan6 #trumpadministration

1. UK’s Sunak’s Apology: An Insight into Leadership and Public Perception https://ift.tt/xvhlJIg Sunak In the realm of politics, every action, no matter how seemingly trivial, is scrutinized under the relentless gaze of the public eye. Recently, British Prime Minister Rishi Sunak found himself embroiled in controversy after his decision to leave international D-Day commemorations in France prematurely to partake in a television interview, as part of his campaign for the United Kingdom’s upcoming election next month. Understanding the Incident The incident, which occurred amidst a backdrop of solemnity and remembrance, sparked widespread criticism from various quarters, with voices from across the political spectrum decrying the Prime Minister’s perceived prioritization of media exposure over honoring the sacrifices of those who fought and died during the historic D-Day landings. The Apology In response to the backlash, Prime Minister Sunak took to social media to issue a formal apology, acknowledging the error in judgment and expressing remorse for any offense caused by his actions. While the apology may have been a necessary step in damage control, it also sheds light on broader issues concerning leadership, accountability, and public perception in the realm of politics. Leadership and Accountability Leadership is not merely about making decisions; it is about making the right decisions, especially in moments of significance and solemnity. In the case of Prime Minister Sunak, the decision to prioritize a television interview over attending a commemorative ceremony raises questions about his priorities and the values he espouses as a leader. The Importance of Symbolism Symbolism plays a crucial role in politics, often carrying more weight than words themselves. By choosing to leave the D-Day event early, Prime Minister Sunak inadvertently sent a message—one that suggested a lack of reverence for history, sacrifice, and the memory of those who laid down their lives for the greater good. Public Perception and Political Fallout In the realm of politics, public perception can make or break a leader’s reputation. Prime Minister Sunak’s decision to prioritize media engagement over honoring veterans and fallen heroes has undoubtedly left a mark on public consciousness, potentially influencing voter sentiments in the upcoming election. Conclusion The incident involving Prime Minister Sunak’s premature departure from the D-Day commemorations serves as a sobering reminder of the complexities and responsibilities inherent in political leadership. While apologies can serve as a form of damage control, they also underscore the importance of foresight, integrity, and humility in navigating the intricate terrain of public opinion. via POTPOURRINEWS https://ift.tt/uOYZ2Sm June 07, 2024 at 12:11PM

Naïve! The Founding Fathers’ belief that federal service would attract virtuous leaders is in stark contrast with today’s reality of career politicians driven by personal interests. It highlights the divergence from the Federalist vision of selfless governance, reflecting on the disappointing prevalence of greed and ambition over the public good. In short – it stinks! #politics #careerpoliticians #government #congress #federalistpapers #foundingfathers