Ambika Pande’s Post

View profile for Ambika Pande, graphic

Product @ Razorpay • Early Stage Investments @ Atrium Angels • ISB Co’21 • Former Pro Athlete

📊 Do all roads in fintech lead to license aggregation? 📌 In Feb ‘24 the # of fully licensed payment aggregators (PA) was 15. By May, it ~2x’ed to 27 📌 New entities with a full PA license: CAMS, Toucan, Concerto, Boku, Unlimit, Worldline, CCAvenue, Innoviti, Mswipe, Groww, AmazonPay & Finacus There are others with in-principle approvals & not full licenses (yet) ✅ 33 PAs are in-principle approved & can operate. Major names: PayU, Phonepe, PineLabs, and fintechs such as CRED, Mobikwik, Eazebuzz & Adyen ✅ 11 are approved, & can’t operate. Ex: Nium, Payglocal 60+ PAs? That's pretty crowded. 📌 For ecomm players, a PA license could be more for optionality - enable negotiating power and build in the future (if needed). And for tech & non payment fintechs, a bundled offering: Ex: Microsoft Teams Vs Slack strategy. As companies scale they graduate to multiple PAs, so this could be an added benefit non payment players offer to win clients for their core offering, not necessarily a PA play But that solves for non payment players. Even within payments it’s crowded: ~15 core PAs with some form of license that can operate ✅ Full license & core PA: Razorpay, Paymentz, CCAvenue, Cashfree, Stripe, Worldline, Boku, Unlimit ✅ In-principle approval & can operate: Core PA: Adyen, Eazebuzz, PayU. Non core PA but scaling: PineLabs & PhonePe. Payments Tech: Juspay 📌 And interestingly: 6 /10 Top UPI Fintech Apps (vol. and val.) have some sort of PA license (Phonepe, Gpay). Maybe an early indicator of future movement of UPI App to PA? But it's too soon to tell 📌 Product builds are momentary moats. So the differentiating factor could be licenses, which allow additional monetization & experience. Ex: Prepaid Instruments (PPI) for gifting/loyalty & Account Aggregators (AA) for seamless information sharing 📌 Some PA’s have already started. Below are the PAs (in stages of approval) with multiple licenses: CRED: PA, PPI, NBFC PhonePe: PA, PPI, AA Nium: PA, PPI Razorpay: PA, PPI Pinelabs: PA, PPI, AA Digio: PA, AA AmazonPay: PA, PPI Mobikwik: PA, PPI Sodexo: PA, PPI 📌 Of PAs, CRED, Groww, Zomato, PayU & TATA have affiliated NBFCs. Others like Fi & Jupiter are neobanks - I suppose if not banking then an NBFC is the next best thing 📌 NBFC licenses are highly coveted. There are 9500+ NBFCs in India, most of which are dormant, which fintechs seek to acquire. But RBI is reluctant to give them out 📌 But why? Could be overlapping ownership. The same VC / PE’s have invested in multiple fintechs, some of which have received NBFC licenses. RBI generally is not in favor of the same entity holding multiple NBFC licenses and has extended that logic to investors. That’s probably why OneCard and others were rejected: Matrix is an investor in OneCard & Jupiter, and Jupiter has an NBFC license To read the full article, and other pieces like this, click below: https://lnkd.in/gftFhKV3 #fintech #PA

[#27] Do all roads in fintech lead to license aggregation?

[#27] Do all roads in fintech lead to license aggregation?

thepaintedstork.substack.com

Lakshay Bulani

NPCI | Digital Payments | Network Partnerships | Ex - Razorpay, AmEx, Marsh & McLennan Group

2mo

Extremely insightful. Thank you for sharing

Sanchit Agarwal

Strategic Partnerships @ Razorpay, Ex - PineLabs

2mo

Quite an interesting read!

Rahul Mattihalli 🌱

CTO - Verboace | Building Philoquent.ai | I can squat 160Kg and Deadlift 215kg eating only plants in B-school

2mo

There is hardly any differentiating tech in these new age fintech products, in fact calling them fintech is itself not a good way to categorise these businesses because most are just online payment platforms, BNPL and virtual credit cards.

See more comments

To view or add a comment, sign in

Explore topics