The American Throne Room: When Executive Power Meets Cognitive Decline
🇺🇲 In early July 2024, the news cycle was filled with celebrations of American Independence Day and an increasingly heated swirl of speculation about President Joe Biden's cognitive fitness.
"The conundrum of current leadership paradigms is missing frameworks and procedures for finding a leader fallible, unfit, or compromised due to psychological or biological factors." (Brittain-Hale, 2022).
The question of leadership fallibility is timeless. Historical records demonstrate numerous instances of a ruler's incapacity significantly impacting governance.
👑 "A study of historical leadership raises the issue of whether the course of events is fixed, driven by socioeconomic factors that can be expressed in terms of established sociohistorical laws, or if it is more capriciously dictated by eventualities such as the untimely death of a prince without rightful heirs, the assassination of a prospective successor to the throne at the hands of a lunatic, or a natural calamity that threatens to destroy a state." (Brittain-Hale, 2022)
🇬🇧 As we reflect on American independence, it's crucial to consider how George III's mental health challenges influenced history during his reign from 1760 to 1820. His periods of instability, particularly during the American Revolution and his later years, arguably contributed to the British loss of the colonies and the birth of a new nation.
This historical example parallels contemporary challenges in leadership health and capacity. The present conundrum in American politics is two-fold:
💵 Firstly, there is a lack of a process or mechanism to change a presumptive nominee or ongoing campaign, along with the allocated campaign funds, to another candidate. This issue becomes particularly problematic when concerns about a candidate's fitness arise after securing significant financial and political support.
📃 Secondly, the 25th Amendment, designed to address presidential inability, has proven largely ineffective due to its lack of concrete markers and procedures and the potential for sycophantic loyalties in the presidential cabinet. This well-intentioned amendment has yet to be successfully deployed in a situation of ambiguous presidential incapacity.
These issues transcend party lines, as evidenced by similar crises of confidence occurring with both Donald Trump in 2021 and Joe Biden in the current political climate. The challenge lies not in partisan politics but in the systemic lack of courage and transparent procedures to confront highly ambiguous crises in leadership across the political spectrum.
Brittain-Hale, A. (2022). A Psychobiographical Leadership Examination Through Linguistic Analysis and Digital Ethnography. Speech presented at the Graduate School of Education and Psychology, Pepperdine University.
BrainStates Inc
