Charleston County, South Carolina, United States
Contact Info
7K followers
500+ connections
Articles by Mitch
-
A Funny Thing Happened on the Way to Getting CPI Shelter Under Control
A Funny Thing Happened on the Way to Getting CPI Shelter Under Control
By Mitch Bollinger, CFA, CAIA
Activity
-
Check out my interview today on Yahoo Finance with Brad Smith on the #macroeconomy, #interestrates, and #housing https://lnkd.in/eM_jeFGa
Check out my interview today on Yahoo Finance with Brad Smith on the #macroeconomy, #interestrates, and #housing https://lnkd.in/eM_jeFGa
Liked by Mitch Bollinger, CFA, CAIA
-
I have not checked in on the Atlanta Fed's Home Ownership Affordability monitor for a while. The index is set up such that the affordability…
I have not checked in on the Atlanta Fed's Home Ownership Affordability monitor for a while. The index is set up such that the affordability…
Shared by Mitch Bollinger, CFA, CAIA
-
Checking in on some data from the Mortgage Bankers Association. See that the MBA's mortgage application purchase index has been below the post GFC…
Checking in on some data from the Mortgage Bankers Association. See that the MBA's mortgage application purchase index has been below the post GFC…
Shared by Mitch Bollinger, CFA, CAIA
Licenses & Certifications
Publications
-
IRR: Snake Oil by Another Name
The Journal of Investing
Finance uses the phrase “risk-adjusted returns” to define what value is, and fiduciaries are legally bound to consider both risk and reward in investment decision-making. This requirement is codified in the Uniform Prudent Investor Act, which states, “The trade-off in all investing between risk and return is identified as the fiduciary’s central consideration.” Yet, the most prominent performance metric in private equity (PE) is the internal rate of return (IRR), an inadequate tool for…
Finance uses the phrase “risk-adjusted returns” to define what value is, and fiduciaries are legally bound to consider both risk and reward in investment decision-making. This requirement is codified in the Uniform Prudent Investor Act, which states, “The trade-off in all investing between risk and return is identified as the fiduciary’s central consideration.” Yet, the most prominent performance metric in private equity (PE) is the internal rate of return (IRR), an inadequate tool for fiduciary purposes because it includes no concept of risk, which represents fully half of the characteristics that fiduciaries are obligated to evaluate. An astute fund manager can exploit this willingness of PE investors to pay for returns that are not creating positive alpha. The key to understanding how a manager can do this lies in examining the role that financial leverage plays in the returns of PE funds and how such financial leverage affects IRRs. Metrics built on the direct alpha public market equivalent (PME) analysis are appropriate to estimate the risk-adjusted returns generated by PE funds and to fulfill fiduciary duties.
-
Another Look at Private Real Estate Returns by Strategy
Journal of Portfolio Management's Special Real Estate Issue
This article examines the risk-adjusted, net-of-fee performance of noncore funds and generally finds that investors would have been better served by merely placing additional leverage on their core investments rather than investing in noncore assets. Using several datasets to create a mosaic-like view of the performance of private real estate investments, the authors find that over the 2000–2017 study period, value-added funds have, on average, generated an alpha of –3.26%; similarly…
This article examines the risk-adjusted, net-of-fee performance of noncore funds and generally finds that investors would have been better served by merely placing additional leverage on their core investments rather than investing in noncore assets. Using several datasets to create a mosaic-like view of the performance of private real estate investments, the authors find that over the 2000–2017 study period, value-added funds have, on average, generated an alpha of –3.26%; similarly, opportunistic funds have generated an alpha of –2.85%. Consequently, had investors in core funds used more leverage (loan-to-value ratios of 55% to 65%), they would have saved approximately $7.5 billion per year in unnecessary investment-management fees. The higher fees charged by these noncore funds were a material factor contributing to their negative alphas. Value-added funds charged approximately three times as much in fees as core funds, and opportunistic funds charged approximately four times as much. How and why these fee structures might change in the future is also explored. However, the fee differentials (relative to core funds) are insufficient to explain the entirety of the negative alpha associated with value-added and opportunistic investing. These conditions imply that noncore managers have, on average, overpaid for (and/or mismanaged) fund assets.
Other authors -
More activity by Mitch
-
A quick bit of history on the Fed's dual mandate. "The Fed's modern statutory mandate, as described in the 1977 amendment to the Federal Reserve…
A quick bit of history on the Fed's dual mandate. "The Fed's modern statutory mandate, as described in the 1977 amendment to the Federal Reserve…
Shared by Mitch Bollinger, CFA, CAIA
Other similar profiles
Explore collaborative articles
We’re unlocking community knowledge in a new way. Experts add insights directly into each article, started with the help of AI.
Explore More