Mitch Bollinger, CFA, CAIA

Charleston County, South Carolina, United States Contact Info
7K followers 500+ connections

Join to view profile

Articles by Mitch

See all articles

Activity

Join now to see all activity

Licenses & Certifications

Publications

  • IRR: Snake Oil by Another Name

    The Journal of Investing

    Finance uses the phrase “risk-adjusted returns” to define what value is, and fiduciaries are legally bound to consider both risk and reward in investment decision-making. This requirement is codified in the Uniform Prudent Investor Act, which states, “The trade-off in all investing between risk and return is identified as the fiduciary’s central consideration.” Yet, the most prominent performance metric in private equity (PE) is the internal rate of return (IRR), an inadequate tool for…

    Finance uses the phrase “risk-adjusted returns” to define what value is, and fiduciaries are legally bound to consider both risk and reward in investment decision-making. This requirement is codified in the Uniform Prudent Investor Act, which states, “The trade-off in all investing between risk and return is identified as the fiduciary’s central consideration.” Yet, the most prominent performance metric in private equity (PE) is the internal rate of return (IRR), an inadequate tool for fiduciary purposes because it includes no concept of risk, which represents fully half of the characteristics that fiduciaries are obligated to evaluate. An astute fund manager can exploit this willingness of PE investors to pay for returns that are not creating positive alpha. The key to understanding how a manager can do this lies in examining the role that financial leverage plays in the returns of PE funds and how such financial leverage affects IRRs. Metrics built on the direct alpha public market equivalent (PME) analysis are appropriate to estimate the risk-adjusted returns generated by PE funds and to fulfill fiduciary duties.

    See publication
  • Another Look at Private Real Estate Returns by Strategy

    Journal of Portfolio Management's Special Real Estate Issue

    This article examines the risk-adjusted, net-of-fee performance of noncore funds and generally finds that investors would have been better served by merely placing additional leverage on their core investments rather than investing in noncore assets. Using several datasets to create a mosaic-like view of the performance of private real estate investments, the authors find that over the 2000–2017 study period, value-added funds have, on average, generated an alpha of –3.26%; similarly…

    This article examines the risk-adjusted, net-of-fee performance of noncore funds and generally finds that investors would have been better served by merely placing additional leverage on their core investments rather than investing in noncore assets. Using several datasets to create a mosaic-like view of the performance of private real estate investments, the authors find that over the 2000–2017 study period, value-added funds have, on average, generated an alpha of –3.26%; similarly, opportunistic funds have generated an alpha of –2.85%. Consequently, had investors in core funds used more leverage (loan-to-value ratios of 55% to 65%), they would have saved approximately $7.5 billion per year in unnecessary investment-management fees. The higher fees charged by these noncore funds were a material factor contributing to their negative alphas. Value-added funds charged approximately three times as much in fees as core funds, and opportunistic funds charged approximately four times as much. How and why these fee structures might change in the future is also explored. However, the fee differentials (relative to core funds) are insufficient to explain the entirety of the negative alpha associated with value-added and opportunistic investing. These conditions imply that noncore managers have, on average, overpaid for (and/or mismanaged) fund assets.

    Other authors
    • Joseph L. Pagliari, Jr. at the University of Chicago
    See publication

More activity by Mitch

View Mitch’s full profile

  • See who you know in common
  • Get introduced
  • Contact Mitch directly
Join to view full profile

Other similar profiles

Explore collaborative articles

We’re unlocking community knowledge in a new way. Experts add insights directly into each article, started with the help of AI.

Explore More

Add new skills with these courses