Kevin Donovan

🚨 NJ Appellate Division Decision – Jurisdictional Law on Sex Abuse Litigation 🚨 On February 28, 2024, the NJ Appellate Division decided E.T., A.M., A.R., and others v. The Boys and Girls Clubs of America, reversing the lower court's decision that New Jersey courts have specific personal jurisdiction over the Boys and Girls Clubs of America (BGCA) in a case involving allegations of sexual abuse by a counselor within The Boys and Girls Clubs of Hudson County. This pivotal decision highlights the complexities of jurisdictional law, particularly in cases involving national organizations with local affiliates.   In this case, the plaintiffs alleged they were sexually abused by Arthur Freudenberg, a part-time counselor for the Hudson County BGC, between approximately 1978 and 1982. They sought compensatory and punitive damages from the local entity and the national organization, BGCA. However, jurisdictional discovery showed that BGCA, based in Georgia, did not have direct control over the local club's hiring, training, or supervision practices, including those of Freudenberg. The Appellate Division found that BGCA's connection to New Jersey, through affiliation and brand used by the Hudson County BGC, did not constitute purposeful availment of New Jersey jurisdiction concerning the allegations.   This decision significantly marks the limits of specific personal jurisdiction and underscores the need for clarity in the operational relationships between national organizations and their local affiliates.   Read the Full Decision Here: https://lnkd.in/ePagx6NE   Stay informed with regular legal updates from our team of former prosecutors at the Bianchi Law Group. Follow us for insightful commentary and legal analysis on criminal defense, domestic violence, and municipal court cases.   Need legal assistance or looking to refer a case? Don't hesitate to call us 24/7 at (862) 315-7929. #FormerProsecutors #CriminalDefense #DomesticViolence #DWI #DUI #NJ No aspect of this advertisement has been approved by the Supreme Court of #NewJersey   🛡️ TEAM OF FORMER PROSECUTORS 🛡️ Robert (Bob) Bianchi, Esq. David Bruno, Esq. Danielle Esposito, Esq. Christopher A. Eaton, Esq. Paul A. Di Lella, Esq. Tricia Howarth Margolis Esq. Christina Hall, Esq. Maura Lynch Robert Esnes Alessandro Amato

4

2 Comments

🚨New Legal Decision | Criminal Law🚨Legal Implications of Traffic Violations in #NewJersey🚘 📲https://lnkd.in/e9fZUnpA ▷ Can You Go to Jail for Traffic Violations in New Jersey? Yes, some traffic offenses can carry a sentence that includes time in jail. Typically, something like a rolling stop or basic speeding ticket doesn’t land you in a situation to worry about jail time—consequences for these types of traffic offenses tend to be administrative and financial in nature. You might end up with a fine or lose your license privileges if you’ve had numerous offenses within a certain period of time. However, traffic offenses such as DWI or leaving the scene of an accident can result in more serious consequences, including jail time, in New Jersey. Do You Need a Lawyer to Help Defend Against Traffic Violation Charges? Basic traffic offenses don’t typically call for involving an attorney. However, if you’re facing traffic offense charges that might result in jail time, lengthy loss of your license, or other serious consequences, working with a team of former prosecutors on your defense can help you protect your future freedom and rights. Contact the Bianchi Law Group to find out how we can help by calling... 24/7 at (862) 315-7929🛡 Stay informed with regular legal updates from our team of former prosecutors at The Bianchi Law Group. Follow us for insightful commentary and legal analysis on criminal defense, domestic violence, and municipal court cases. #FormerProsecutors #CriminalDefense #DomesticViolence #DWI #DUI #NJ No aspect of this advertisement has been approved by the Supreme Court of #NewJersey 🛡️ TEAM OF FORMER PROSECUTORS 🛡️ Robert (Bob) Bianchi, Esq. David Bruno, Esq. Danielle Esposito, Esq. Christopher A. Eaton, Esq. Paul A. Di Lella, Esq. Tricia Howarth Margolis Esq. Christina Hall, Esq. Maura Lynch Robert Esnes Alessandro Amato

11

Motions for reconsideration are used in New Jersey under the right circumstances. A motion for reconsideration is a legal document filed after a court decision that allows parties to ask the judge to reconsider the outcome of a case. However, they cannot be used just because a party disagrees with the Judge’s decision. Motions for reconsideration can only be filed if there is a clear demonstration that the judge’s decision has fallen into a specified category of error. The grounds for which these motions can be filed and granted are very specific, and extremely narrow.  Learn more about which circumstances are applicable and rely on an experienced attorney at our firm for assistance with all of your family court needs, including a motion for reconsideration.

1

🚨 Understanding Warrant vs. Summons Complaints in New Jersey 🚨 In this video, BLG partner Robert Bianchi, Esq. discusses the critical differences between a warrant and a summons complaint in New Jersey. Navigating the legal system can be daunting, especially when facing the complexities of criminal charges. One question that frequently arises is the difference between a warrant and a summons complaint. Bob breaks down these terms, explaining that a summons complaint, identifiable by an 'S' number, allows the accused to be free post-complaint issuance. On the other hand, a warrant complaint, marked with a 'W', signifies a more severe scenario where the accused is detained, photographed, and fingerprinted. This video is essential for anyone seeking clarity on these processes or facing such circumstances -> https://lnkd.in/ez4tP5sx Stay informed with regular legal updates from our team of former prosecutors at the Bianchi Law Group. Follow us for insightful commentary and legal analysis on criminal defense, domestic violence, and municipal court cases. 👨‍⚖️ Need legal assistance or looking to refer a case? 📲 Don't hesitate to call us 24/7 at (862) 315-7929. #FormerProsecutors #CriminalDefense #DomesticViolence #DWI #DUI #NJ #NewJersey 🛡️ TEAM OF FORMER PROSECUTORS 🛡️ No aspect of this advertisement has been approved by the Supreme Court of #NewJersey  Robert (Bob) Bianchi, Esq. David Bruno, Esq. Danielle Esposito Christopher A. Eaton, Esq. Paul A. Di Lella Tricia Howarth Margolis Esq. Christina Hall Maura Lynch Robert Esnes Alessandro Amato

11

7 Comments

🚨 Coercive Control: The Game-Changer in NJ Domestic Violence Cases 📲https://lnkd.in/eqH6b_Qg ☞ Discover crucial updates to New Jersey law with The Bianchi Law Group, LLC! Earlier this year, New Jersey legislators amended the Domestic Violence Act, significantly impacting restraining orders throughout the state. This new NJ law focuses on "coercive control" in cases of domestic violence, adding a new dimension to the evidence and judicial requirements. In this video, we delve into: ▷ The definition and examples of "coercive control" ▷ The amended legal framework for restraining orders ▷ The "Silver Factors" and their application in court ▷ How these changes affect plaintiffs and the defense strategy CHAPTERS: 0:00 - Coercive Control in Restraining Orders 0:19 - What is a Predicate Act 0:57 - Silver Factors Stay informed with regular legal updates from our team of former prosecutors at The Bianchi Law Group. Follow us for insightful commentary and legal analysis on criminal defense, domestic violence, and municipal court cases. Need legal assistance or looking to refer a case? Don't hesitate to call us 24/7 at (862) 315-7929 No aspect of this advertisement has been approved by the Supreme Court of New Jersey. #FormerProsecutors #CriminalDefense #DomesticViolence #DWI #DUI #NJ #newjersey

2

1 Comment

This is your last call to register for today's CLE program with the NYS Academy of Trial Lawyers. At 1:00 p.m. ET, please join NAM neutrals, the Hon. Paul J. Baisley, Jr. (Ret.) and Michael Titowsky, Esq., as they discuss navigating the settlement of Labor Law cases in New York. Section 240 of New York State Labor Law, also known as the “Scaffolding Law,” protects the rights of construction workers who suffer a fall or are struck by a falling object. This legal requirement mandates construction site owners and contractors to provide scaffolding and other safety equipment that affords proper protection for workers. These unique types of cases require careful preparation with settlement as the goal. Our presenters will address how best to approach these types of mediations by answering questions such as how to increase chances of success, how to respond to (and hopefully move past) an impasse, and will also provide tips on proper preparation, submissions and what a mediator is looking for to facilitate a resolution. Last chance to register: https://bit.ly/3x9hymC

2

Why do medical malpractice cases take so much time? From obtaining certificates of merit to dealing with multiple parties, these cases are nuanced and require the careful attention of an experienced attorney. https://lnkd.in/eSYiTkik #law #lawfirm #medicalmalpractice #newyork

1

🚨The Crumbley Case and Parental Liability New Jersey State Bar Association🚨 The Crumbley Case and Parental Liability Friday, May 3rd 12:00-1:40 ☞ Robert (Bob) Bianchi, Esq. (Former Head Morris County Prosecutor) and Robert B. Hille, Esq. (Certified by the Supreme Court of New Jersey as a Civil Trial Attorney) show how The Crumbley Case was a Landmark Decision in Parental Liability. The #Crumbley Case Outcome The tragic school shooting at Oxford High School in Michigan in December 2021 took a dramatic turn in February and March of 2024 with the convictions of Jennifer and James Crumbley, the parents of the teenage shooter, Ethan Crumbley. This case marks a significant precedent in holding parents legally responsible for their children's access to firearms and potential danger they pose. The Debate Continues Opponents of the Crumbley verdicts express concern that holding parents criminally responsible for their children's actions sets a dangerous precedent. They argue it's difficult to define the line between parental responsibility and criminal culpability. The Crumbley case has undoubtedly opened a new chapter in legal discussions surrounding parental liability. Whether this approach proves effective in deterring future school shootings and gun violence remains to be seen. Event #Agenda This will be a free-flowing discussion. The person named after each heading will lead that particular topic. Introduction – Lisa Chapland Overview of the topic. – Robert Bianchi ·     Includes the “Law and Crime” clip, putting the Crumbley case in context. ·     Discussion of the Michigan statute under which the Crumbleys were convicted. The Verdict – Robert Hille ·     How did involuntary manslaughter apply to the parents? ·     How is this different from holding the parents liable under vicarious liability? ·     What does the holding mean for possible criminal exposure to parents? Novel and unique theory holding the parents responsible for acts of their children. The Ramifications- Robert Bianchi ·     Has the case escalated our ability to go after parents by accusing them of using their children as instruments of a crime? ·     Will parents bear civil liability for their children’s transgressions? ·     Examples: Parents are aware child is a bad driver but let’s them use the car. If the child is in an accident, are the parents liable for a damage? Child has a history of acting out and hits a child or teacher in school. Are the parents liable? ·     Could parents weaponize liability under this new Crumbley theory in a family law dispute? What Do We, as Lawyers, Need to Address with Our Clients? –  Robert Bianchi, Robert Hille, Lisa Chapland Need legal assistance or looking to refer a case? Don't hesitate to call us 24/7 at (862) 315-7929 #FormerProsecutors #CriminalDefense #DomesticViolence #DWI #DUI #NJ No aspect of this advertisement has been approved by the Supreme Court of #NewJersey

5

3 Comments

WHAT COMPENSATION CAN I GET IN MY NJ PERSONAL INJURY CASE? --- When you bring a personal injury case in New Jersey, you are pursuing an award of monetary damages to compensate you for the many different types of costs that the defendant(s) imposed by tortiously hurting you. There are two main types of compensatory damages for which you can recover: economic and non-economic damages. Economic damages are generally going to be comprised of the following: 1. Loss of income 2. Unreimbursed medical expenses 3. Property damage (in limited examples) However, often the non-economic damages you have incurred will present the most opportunity to get value for your case. Non-economic damages include: 1. Pain and suffering – Physical and mental distress and anguish caused by the injury 2. Loss of consortium or companionship - The inability to be physically close or intimate with family members or loved ones 3. Loss of enjoyment of life - Loss of the ability to enjoy the ordinary activities of daily life or to participate in activities that formerly gave the injured party joy, fulfillment or happiness We establish non-economic damages first and foremost by showing the extent and seriousness of your medical treatment from the injury, including especially any surgeries, procedures, or physical therapy. Demonstrating the permanency of your injury and the likelihood that you will need future treatment further substantiates your case. There is no set formula to determine the value of your case, no matter what anyone else tells you. Ultimately, a jury needs to believe and sympathize with you, and to blame the defendant(s) on a gut level for causing your injuries. Your credible testimony in setting out the extent to which your life has been damaged by the defendant(s) is crucial to swaying the human beings who will ultimately judge your case. It is your attorney’s job to properly prepare you to testify, diligently build up the other evidence needed to make your case, and zealously argue to the jury and the defendants that you are badly injured and that the defendants bear responsibility for hurting you in order to max out your recovery.     CONTACT ME FOR A FREE CONSULTATION REGARDING YOUR PERSONAL INJURY CASE TODAY.   Disclaimer: This content was created by Nicholas A. Macri, Esq. solely for advertising purposes, is not legal advice for your situation, and is merely generalized information about the current state of applicable law as of the date of posting. No attorney-client relationship is established by virtue of your having consumed this content. Prior results do not guarantee a similar outcome. /s/  Nicholas A. Macri, Esq.       The Macri Law Firm      1719 NJ-10, Suite 123      Parsippany-Troy Hills, NJ 07054      (973) 647-8861      nicholas@macrilawyer.com     macrilawyers.com ©️ 2024 The Macri Law Firm. All Rights Reserved.

1

🚨 New NJ Appellate Division Decision – Fourth Amendment Rights 🚨 On February 7, 2024, the Superior Court of New Jersey, Appellate Division decided State v. Haskins, examining the retroactive application of State v. Smith concerning traffic stops for tinted windows. The court deemed Haskins' appeal within the "pipeline," despite the appeal filed after the Smith decision. Khalil H. Haskins faced a traffic stop for tinted windows, which led to the seizure of illegal substances and a firearm. The motion to suppress the evidence was denied, based on State v. Cohen. However, Haskins contended the stop was unlawful under State v. Smith, which redefined reasonable suspicion for window tints. The appellate court, analyzing the retroactivity of Smith, applied a three-step process: confirming Smith as a new rule, considering its purpose for enhancing fact-finding, and assessing the impact on the administration of justice. Choosing pipeline retroactivity, the court vacated the denial of the motion to suppress, remanding the case for a review under the Smith standards, and directed that a new judge oversee the proceedings to ensure impartiality. You can read the entire case here - https://lnkd.in/eH9QGm-v Stay informed with regular legal updates from our team of former prosecutors at the Bianchi Law Group. Follow us for insightful commentary and legal analysis on criminal defense, domestic violence, and municipal court cases. 👨‍⚖️ Need legal assistance or looking to refer a case? 📲 Don't hesitate to call us 24/7 at (862) 315-7929. #FormerProsecutors #CriminalDefense #DomesticViolence #DWI #DUI #NJ #NewJersey No aspect of this advertisement has been approved by the Supreme Court of #NewJersey  🛡️ TEAM OF FORMER PROSECUTORS 🛡️ Robert (Bob) Bianchi, Esq. David Bruno, Esq. Danielle Esposito Christopher A. Eaton, Esq. Paul A. Di Lella Tricia Howarth Margolis Esq. Christina Hall Maura Lynch Robert Esnes Alessandro Amato

5

2 Comments