John Jones

In a recent victory, Frier Levitt attorneys Dae Y. Lee, Pharm.D, Esq., CPBS and Adam Farkas successfully aided a NJ pharmacy overturn more than 91% of the alleged discrepancies issued by a major PBM. The alleged discrepancy types included missing proof of delivery, drug invoice shortages, and missing pharmacy licenses. To learn more about how Frier Levitt can assist your pharmacy with adverse PBM actions, read the article here: https://lnkd.in/eRETCK53 #FrierLevitt #PBMaudits #PharmacyLaw #LegalVictory

16

Pennsylvania’s Antitrust Bill – Will It Be Passed? Health Law alert by Lamb McErlane attorneys Vasilios Kalogredis and Sonal Parekh, Esq. On April 17, 2024, House Bill 2012 (“HB 2012”) was presented, as amended, to the Pennsylvania House of Representatives. First introduced on February 5, 2024, HB 2012, if passed and signed into law, will represent and create the first state specific antitrust statute for Pennsylvania. HB 2012 was introduced with the expressed purpose of promoting free enterprise and trade by prohibiting restraints of trade that are secured through “monopolistic practices” and that act or tend to act to decrease competition in Pennsylvania. Read the alert here: https://lnkd.in/gqQE3MBh #healthcarelawattorney #healthlaw #healthcarelaw #HB2012 #antitrustbill 

16

Don’t miss the opportunity to attend the NYSBA Antitrust Section’s upcoming panel, “Trial & Error: Winning Strategies for Trying Antitrust Cases” on Wednesday May 1, 2024 from 6-8 pm.   This program will provide insights about effective trial strategies and courtroom advocacy from a judge who recently presided over a merger enforcement action and experienced practitioners who have tried civil and criminal cases as enforcers, plaintiffs’ counsel, and defense counsel. Topics of discussion will include effective techniques for opening and closing arguments, presenting complex legal and economic principles, cross-examining expert and hostile witnesses, and developing themes that will resonate with a judge or jury.   Sign-up here: https://lnkd.in/eXP-XTrM

8

1 Comment

🚨 Understanding Warrant vs. Summons Complaints in New Jersey 🚨 In this video, BLG partner Robert Bianchi, Esq. discusses the critical differences between a warrant and a summons complaint in New Jersey. Navigating the legal system can be daunting, especially when facing the complexities of criminal charges. One question that frequently arises is the difference between a warrant and a summons complaint. Bob breaks down these terms, explaining that a summons complaint, identifiable by an 'S' number, allows the accused to be free post-complaint issuance. On the other hand, a warrant complaint, marked with a 'W', signifies a more severe scenario where the accused is detained, photographed, and fingerprinted. This video is essential for anyone seeking clarity on these processes or facing such circumstances -> https://lnkd.in/ez4tP5sx Stay informed with regular legal updates from our team of former prosecutors at the Bianchi Law Group. Follow us for insightful commentary and legal analysis on criminal defense, domestic violence, and municipal court cases. 👨‍⚖️ Need legal assistance or looking to refer a case? 📲 Don't hesitate to call us 24/7 at (862) 315-7929. #FormerProsecutors #CriminalDefense #DomesticViolence #DWI #DUI #NJ #NewJersey 🛡️ TEAM OF FORMER PROSECUTORS 🛡️ No aspect of this advertisement has been approved by the Supreme Court of #NewJersey  Robert (Bob) Bianchi, Esq. David Bruno, Esq. Danielle Esposito Christopher A. Eaton, Esq. Paul A. Di Lella Tricia Howarth Margolis Esq. Christina Hall Maura Lynch Robert Esnes Alessandro Amato

11

7 Comments

To help litigants avoid the pitfalls of noncompliance to discovery obligations, Skadden attorneys provide an overview of the rules empowering courts to impose sanctions and examples of courts employing this authority to deter discovery violations. Lara Flath | Jacob Fargo | Gaby Colvin #litigation #discovery #compliance

25

The New Jersey Law Journal published "Litigators Face New Challenges Under Revised Open Records Law," explaining that some New Jersey litigators will need to adjust their methods in light of Governor Murphy's decision to sign a measure modifying the state's Open Public Records Act (OPRA). Cohn Lifland's Walter Luers, who represents records requesters said, "I think that because OPRA remains a remedial statute, courts will still accept arguments that, even in the absence of bad faith on the part of a records custodian, counsel fees should be awarded to prevailing plaintiffs.” Luers is more concerned, however, about whether a law firm representing a records requester in OPRA litigation is considered a commercial requester under the new law. The legislators who drafted the law say it was needed because of the burden that commercial data companies create for records custodians. Requesters who give the wrong answer on whether they are commercial entities are subject to a $1,000 fine under the new law, Luers said. “Law firms are going to have to look very carefully as to whether or not requests that they file on behalf of a requester are commercial requests.” He adds, “I think that’s a gray area that’s probably going to have to be litigated.” #OPRA #openpublicrecordsact

7

The FTC's push for a bigger budget and the DOJ's newly constituted Task Force on Health Care Monopolies and Collusion hint at hurdles ahead for health care transactions. Read the latest Antitrust Byte from attorneys John Steren, Patricia Wagner, and Jeremy Morris for more. #Antitrust #MergersAndAcquisitions #HealthCare

1

Health care & life sciences partner Robert Salcido, recently spoke on the False Claims Act as a speaker at the National Institute’s ABA False Claims Act conference. Key areas addressed included: • Constitutionality of Qui Tam Provisions: Discussion on potential constitutional challenges to the FCA's qui tam provisions. • The Impact of Supreme Court’s SuperValu Ruling: Analysis of how this decision might affect the scope of the FCA. • Link Between Kickbacks and Referrals: Explanation of the necessary link for proving FCA violations involving kickbacks. The event brought together experts from government, defense​ and legal counsel to explore current trends in FCA enforcement, including strategies for litigation and mediation. #FalseClaimsAct #HealthCare

4

In a recent case, Palkon v. Maffei (TripAdvisor), the Delaware Supreme Court accepted an interlocutory appeal of the Court of Chancery’s denial of shareholders’ motion to dismiss. Such appeals are not common: Delaware Supreme Court Rule 42(b) expressly provides that “[i]nterlocutory appeals should be exceptional, not routine, because they disrupt the normal procession of litigation, cause delay, and can threaten to exhaust scarce party and judicial resources.” Even more unusually, the Delaware Supreme Court took this step over the Court of Chancery’s refusal to certify the appeal. This decision and others demonstrate the Delaware Supreme Court’s willingness to step in affirmatively, even mid-case, to ensure the coherence and predictability of corporate governance law — particularly when a matter of public concern is at stake. Read more on "Delaware’s Appealing Interlocutory Review Regime" on Jim Ducayet and Deepa Chari's blog post.

11

Curious about the impact of a judge’s ruling that an expert opinion didn’t meet #Daubert standards? David Ferrera explains how the decision reinforces a judge’s gatekeeping role under the recent amendments to Rule 702 of the Federal Rules of Evidence in Massachusetts Lawyers Weekly. Read more: https://loom.ly/PeVtEgI #litigation #experttestimony #admissibilitystandard

11

Labor and Employment Partner Brent E Siler was interviewed by Part B News in the article, “FTC’s Labor-Market Rule Ends Most Noncompetes for Physicians, If It Clears.”    Brent discusses how the #FTC final rule that essentially would end noncompete agreements will impact physicians. Legal challenges may delay and/or alter the rule, but if it moves forward, Brent mentioned the potential breadth of the impact.   Learn more >> https://lnkd.in/gRCiS-qh   #LaborRule #LaborandEmployment #HealthCare #Physicians #NonCompete 

7

The State of New Jersey Supreme Court recently issued a pair of rulings of interest to #labor and #employment attorneys. As detailed by #NewYork Partner Peter Shapiro in a new post for the #Grindstone blog, the state high court ruled in one case that non-disparagement provisions in employment #discrimination settlement agreements are unlawful, and held in the other case that 2019 amendments to the state’s Wage Payment Law and Wage and Hour Law are not retroactive. Read the full post on our website to learn more. #LaborLaw #EmploymentLaw #NewJerseyLaw #WageandHour

7

The Department of Justice, Federal Trade Commission, and Department of Health and Human Services launched an online portal for the public to report healthcare practices that may be anticompetitive. https://lnkd.in/gVPCRp_H In this article, Brian Whittaker, Jill Gordon, Michele Masucci, and Gordon Lang outline examples of anticompetitive conduct, what happens after complaints are submitted, and how healthcare businesses can minimize risk.

9

1 Comment

🚨 New New Jersey Criminal Defense Opinion! 🚨 In today's decision of "State v. Brandon M. Washington (A-29-22)", the New Jersey Supreme Court takes a significant step in refining the legal landscape of eyewitness identification. Extending the principles of the pivotal "State v. Henderson" case, this opinion meticulously addresses the complexities surrounding eyewitness identification during trial preparation. Key highlights include: 🟢 Extension of Due Process Safeguards: The court decisively extends the Henderson safeguards to trial preparation, emphasizing the protection of a defendant’s right to due process against the risks of misidentification. 🟢 Avoiding Suggestive Identification: The ruling underscores the importance of avoiding suggestive identification practices and outlines protocols for presenting photos to witnesses. 🟢 Striking a Balance: It provides critical guidance on balancing the need for thorough trial preparation with safeguarding the integrity of eyewitness identifications. 🟢 Impact on Future Cases: This decision is poised to reshape trial preparation procedures, ensuring fairness and accuracy in the judicial process. For a detailed understanding of how this impacts criminal defense strategies and the rights of the accused, download the full judicial opinion. 👨‍⚖️ At the Bianchi Law Group, our team of former prosecutors is deeply knowledgeable in criminal defense and due process rights. We're prepared to offer insightful guidance and formidable defense strategies. 📞 For immediate assistance, call us at 862-292-4501. Let's discuss how this significant ruling can impact your case and how we can provide the strongest defense possible. No aspect of this advertisement has been approved by the Supreme Court of #NewJersey  #CriminalDefense #FormerProsecutors #LegalUpdate #JusticeSystem #NewJerseyLaw #EyewitnessIdentification #BianchiLawGroup 🛡️ TEAM OF FORMER PROSECUTORS 🛡️ Robert (Bob) Bianchi, Esq. David Bruno, Esq. Christina Hall Danielle Esposito Christopher A. Eaton, Esq. Tricia Howarth Margolis Esq. Maura Lynch Robert Esnes

6

3 Comments

In a piece for New Jersey Lawyer, Karen Painter Randall, Chair of Connell Foley LLP’s Cybersecurity Data Privacy and Incident Response Group, and associate Joshua Previl explain how government regulators’ new cybersecurity disclosure rules impact M&A acquirers and targets. To read the article, click below. #NJLawyer #Cybersecurity #MergersAcquisitions #SEC #CybersecurityDisclosures

17

🚨New Legal Decision | Criminal Law🚨 📃New Plea Bargain Path: Navigating New Jersey’s Supreme Court DWI Case Shift 📲https://lnkd.in/dZjNTD5a On February 23, 2024, Chief Justice Stuart Rabner issued a landmark New Jersey Supreme Court order, effective immediately, signifying a historic change in the legal landscape for DWI (Driving While Intoxicated) cases in New Jersey.[1] This order withdraws Guideline 4, a rule that had banned plea agreements in DWI prosecutions, thereby aligning with New Jersey’s amended DWI law, N.J.S.A. 39:4-50, enacted on December 21, 2023. ▷ Navigating New DWI Plea Bargaining: Your Next Steps for Legal Guidance With the repeal of Guideline 4, we stand at a transformative juncture in the history of New Jersey’s legal system. This significant change heralds a new era of flexibility in DWI case management, where the scales of justice are carefully balanced with the tenets of efficient judicial administration. The allowance of plea agreements in DWI cases is a progressive move toward tailoring justice to each unique situation, ensuring that punishment is meted out with an equitable consideration of all circumstances. At the Bianchi Law Group, LLC, we understand that navigating the new terrain of DWI plea bargaining can be complex and intimidating. Our team, composed of seasoned former prosecutors, is well-equipped to guide you through this evolving legal landscape. We are committed to offering you the most informed and strategic legal counsel to navigate plea agreements effectively. If you or someone you know is facing a DWI charge and needs legal advice on proceeding under the new framework, we are here to help. Contact us to explore your legal options and craft a defense strategy that aligns with the latest legal developments. For a comprehensive review of your case and personalized legal assistance, contact the Bianchi Law Group, LLC... Stay informed with regular legal updates from our team of former prosecutors at The Bianchi Law Group. Follow us for insightful commentary and legal analysis on criminal defense, domestic violence, and municipal court cases. #FormerProsecutors #CriminalDefense #DomesticViolence #DWI #DUI #NJ No aspect of this advertisement has been approved by the Supreme Court of #NewJersey TEAM OF FORMER PROSECUTORS Robert (Bob) Bianchi, Esq. David Bruno, Esq. Danielle Esposito, Esq. Christopher A. Eaton, Esq. Paul A. Di Lella, Esq. Tricia Howarth Margolis Esq. Christina Hall, Esq. Maura Lynch Robert Esnes Alessandro Amato

7

2 Comments