About
Activity
-
I once had an attorney tell me that a certain case was really bad for my client. This was in an area of law that I was less familiar with than this…
I once had an attorney tell me that a certain case was really bad for my client. This was in an area of law that I was less familiar with than this…
Liked by Clayton Stallbaumer
-
Peter Kadens and Marsha Oberrieder have been selected Commencement honorees. These distinguished leaders in philanthropy and healthcare will receive…
Peter Kadens and Marsha Oberrieder have been selected Commencement honorees. These distinguished leaders in philanthropy and healthcare will receive…
Liked by Clayton Stallbaumer
-
Great job tonight by Brooke Infusino and Brandi Cummings on conducting the graduation event for YLink’s non-profit Board Training program. Great to…
Great job tonight by Brooke Infusino and Brandi Cummings on conducting the graduation event for YLink’s non-profit Board Training program. Great to…
Liked by Clayton Stallbaumer
Experience & Education
-
McGuireWoods LLP
View Clayton’s full experience
By clicking Continue to join or sign in, you agree to LinkedIn’s User Agreement, Privacy Policy, and Cookie Policy.
Publications
-
From Longitude to Altitude: Inducement Prize Contests as Instruments of Public Policy in Science and Technology
Journal of Law, Technology & Policy (University of Illinois)
See publicationThis article proposes to assess the role of government with respect to inducement prize contests and their underlying technologies. Part II offers an overview of inducement prizes, including descriptions of basic attributes, sponsorship and administration, and comparative advantages
relative to other instruments of public policy in science and technology. Part III examines, via case studies, differences in the public policy treatments of underlying technologies advanced by selected…This article proposes to assess the role of government with respect to inducement prize contests and their underlying technologies. Part II offers an overview of inducement prizes, including descriptions of basic attributes, sponsorship and administration, and comparative advantages
relative to other instruments of public policy in science and technology. Part III examines, via case studies, differences in the public policy treatments of underlying technologies advanced by selected inducement prizes. Further to that examination, Part III analyzes factors involved in the decisions whether to use inducement prizes as instruments of science and technology policy and what measures to pursue to advance or retard innovation in underlying technologies given the existence of relevant inducement prize contests. Finally, Part IV suggests conditions under which government might use inducement prizes as instruments of public policy and provides guidelines for how government might address disputed or disfavored technologies advanced by inducement prize
contests.
Selected for inclusion in the 39th Selected Bibliography on Computers, Technology, and the Law, Rutgers Computer & Technology Law Journal, 2007.
Other similar profiles
Explore collaborative articles
We’re unlocking community knowledge in a new way. Experts add insights directly into each article, started with the help of AI.
Explore MoreOthers named Clayton Stallbaumer
1 other named Clayton Stallbaumer is on LinkedIn
See others named Clayton Stallbaumer