Our modern working world has become far too Complex, Uncertain & Disruptive to rely solely on predictive methods for mitigating material risks. The idea that so many organisations task their risk officers with accurately evaluating future risk outcomes through forward looking evaluations, estimations, forecasting, probabilistic analysis and the like, has always been an oddity to me, as it seems imperfect. Of particular concern is how our accepted risk management guiding standards encourage organisations to all follow the same standardised “Identify, Measure & Treat” process. Such a linear-sequenced control method, can only work however if all material risks are foreseeable, pre-known or rational. However in a working world facing such escalated levels of systemic volatility, this particular method is clearly impaired
The Complexity Sciences teach us that the more Complexity, Uncertainty or Dynamism that exists within a particular system, the more potential for unforeseeable emergent factors to materialise which could cause disruption. It is the increased variety, ambiguity and systemic change on offer which creates a higher potential for unpredictable phenomena to emerge. In fact, the higher the situational Complexity, Uncertainty or rate of Change, the less rational, ordered and predictable the surrounding environment becomes. So much so, that at the highest levels we have Chaos, a state of Wild Disorder which is mostly undeterminable and therefore, often uncontrollable
So what happens when there is simply too many systemic unknowns, too much system variety or too much rapid change to proactively "identify, measure & treat" all risks, what do appointed risk officers do then? As yet our guiding standards still do not provide adequate advice on how to mitigate against those risks which are simply unforeseeable or unquantifiable. So where is the global risk management standard for Disruption, Wicked Problems, Unknown-Unknowns, Black Swans, Chaos, Macro-Global Threats, Polycrisis and the list goes on? We all know these advanced classes of risk exist and that they are increasing in both global frequency & impact. We also know that these particular risks are far to wicked to mitigate through conventional risk methods, so where is the guiding literature on these?
With the need for new learnings in mind, check out Roger Spitz's WEF paper (see link below) whereby he argues that the future is far too uncertain to count on prediction when controlling material risks and thus we now need to move more towards readiness, agility, sense making and scenario planning (aka Resilient Preparation). He also introduces the term “Metaruption” which appears to be an ominous evolution of the current Global Polycrisis
Hold on folks, this ride may get even bumpier still... the question now becomes, what are we all going to do about it?
https://lnkd.in/gqywSRxu
#risk #riskmanagement #resilience #disruption #complexity #complexsystems #systemsthinking