You're facing skeptical stakeholders. How can you justify the assumptions in your financial models?
When presenting financial models in investment banking, you may encounter stakeholders who are skeptical about the underlying assumptions. These assumptions are the bedrock of any financial model and must be both defendable and transparent. Stakeholders, whether they're investors, board members, or potential buyers, need to understand and believe in the rationale behind your projections. It's your job to justify these assumptions in a way that is both clear and convincing.
To ease skepticism, start by explaining your assumptions clearly. Avoid jargon and ensure that each assumption is grounded in reality, with a logical basis. For instance, if you're projecting revenue growth, tie it to concrete factors such as market expansion or new product launches. Stakeholders need to see the direct line from your assumptions to your projections. If they understand the "why" behind the numbers, they're more likely to trust the "what" that the numbers predict.
-
Financial planning as part of an M&A sales process is the basis for a successful sale. Two aspects are elementary for the financial planning to be accepted by the buyer. 1) The assumptions must be plausible, comprehensible and in line with the buyer's expectations. 2) The manager's communication must reflect his conviction. The clarification of the assumptions themselves is therefore initially irrelevant, sometimes even a hindrance. They must a) contain the necessary, objective market data b) reflect the subjectively estimated but measurable future performance of the company c) correspond to the expected range of the buyer - not exaggerated, but also not too conservative d) be convincingly presented Because "perception is reality".
-
From my experience as Investment Banker (previously, Credit Suisse), I believe when outlining assumptions, prioritize simplicity and realism, steering clear of technical jargon and anchoring each assumption in logical reasoning. For instance, when forecasting revenue growth, connect it to tangible drivers like market expansion or product innovations. Demonstrating a clear link between assumptions and projections helps stakeholders grasp the rationale behind the numbers, fostering trust in the predicted outcomes. By ensuring that stakeholders understand the underlying logic of your assumptions and projections, you can build credibility, enhance transparency, and instill confidence in the reliability of your forecasts.
-
“If you can't explain it simply, you don't understand it well enough.” - Albert Einstein. To justify assumptions in your financial models when facing sceptical stakeholders, start by explaining clearly the basis of each assumption. 📊Use empirical data and historical trends to back up your claims, showing the logical flow from past performance to future projections. 📈 Highlight any industry benchmarks or expert opinions that support your assumptions. 🏦 Be transparent about the methodologies and any potential limitations or risks involved. 🔍 Engage stakeholders with visual aids, like graphs and charts, to make complex data more accessible.
-
Ensure stakeholder understanding by clearly explaining the rationale behind each concept. Avoid jargon and focus on the logic and reasoning behind the ideas.
-
To address skepticism, begin by explaining your assumptions clearly. Avoid jargon and ensure each assumption is logically grounded in reality. For example, when projecting revenue growth, link it to concrete factors like market expansion or new product launches. Stakeholders need to see the direct connection between your assumptions and your projections. If they understand the rationale behind your numbers, they are more likely to trust the predictions those numbers suggest. By providing a clear and logical basis for your assumptions, you build credibility and foster trust in your projections.
Utilizing historical data is a powerful way to justify your assumptions. By showing how past trends and performance metrics inform your projections, you can provide stakeholders with a tangible link to reality. For example, if you're assuming a certain growth rate, demonstrate how that rate is consistent with historical growth or how changes in strategy or market conditions justify a deviation. This approach not only adds credibility to your model but also shows that your assumptions are rooted in empirical evidence.
-
Historical data provides a solid basis for your assumptions. Show how past results, examples, and performance descriptions support your current assumptions.
-
Utilizing historical data effectively justifies your assumptions. By demonstrating how past trends and performance metrics inform your projections, you provide stakeholders with a tangible link to reality. For instance, if you assume a specific growth rate, show how it aligns with historical growth or explain how strategic changes or market conditions justify any deviation. This method adds credibility to your model, highlighting that your assumptions are grounded in empirical evidence. By referencing historical data, you reassure stakeholders that your projections are not speculative but based on proven patterns and informed analysis.
In addition to historical data, conduct a thorough market analysis to support your assumptions. This could involve examining industry trends, competitor performance, and macroeconomic factors. By aligning your model with the broader context in which your company operates, you make it harder for stakeholders to dismiss your assumptions as unrealistic. Show that your projections are not made in isolation but are reflective of the market's potential trajectory.
-
Use market research, including industry reports, competitor performance, and economic indicators, to support your assumptions. This external validation helps stakeholders understand the broader context.
-
In addition to historical data, conduct a thorough market analysis to support your assumptions. This involves examining industry trends, competitor performance, and macroeconomic factors. Aligning your model with the broader market context makes it harder for stakeholders to dismiss your assumptions as unrealistic. Demonstrate that your projections are not made in isolation but reflect the market's potential trajectory. By incorporating comprehensive market analysis, you provide a well-rounded justification for your assumptions, reinforcing their credibility and relevance in the current business environment.
Performing a sensitivity analysis can help justify your financial model's assumptions by demonstrating their impact on the outcome. This involves changing key assumptions and observing the effects on the model's results. By presenting a range of scenarios—from conservative to optimistic—you acknowledge uncertainty and show stakeholders how different conditions might affect the company's financial future. This transparency can build confidence in your model's robustness.
-
Sensitivity analysis shows how changes in parameters affect the model results. This helps stakeholders understand the complexity of the model and its potential consequences.
-
Performing a sensitivity analysis helps justify your financial model's assumptions by showing their impact on outcomes. This involves altering key assumptions and observing the effects on the model's results. By presenting a range of scenarios—from conservative to optimistic—you acknowledge uncertainty and illustrate how different conditions might affect the company's financial future. This transparency builds confidence in your model's robustness, demonstrating that it is resilient and adaptable to various potential market conditions, thus strengthening stakeholder trust.
Sometimes, the best way to bolster your assumptions is to back them up with expert opinions. This could be insights from industry analysts, consultants, or academics who specialize in your market. When stakeholders see that respected authorities support your assumptions, they might be more inclined to accept them. However, make sure that these opinions are relevant and come from credible sources to avoid any backfire effect.
-
Backing your assumptions with expert opinions can significantly enhance their credibility. This involves citing insights from industry analysts, consultants, or academics specializing in your market. When stakeholders see that respected authorities support your assumptions, they are more likely to accept them. Ensure these opinions are relevant and come from credible sources to avoid any negative impact. By incorporating authoritative insights, you reinforce the validity of your assumptions and build greater trust among stakeholders.
Lastly, directly address any concerns stakeholders may have about your assumptions. This means actively listening to their doubts and responding with clear, evidence-based explanations. It's important to show that you've considered multiple angles and that your assumptions are not made lightly. By being responsive and open to feedback, you can turn skepticism into constructive dialogue and strengthen the credibility of your financial models.
-
Acknowledge any potential concerns or weaknesses in your assumptions and offer mitigation strategies or alternative scenarios. This approach shows that you have thoroughly considered all aspects.
-
Lastly, directly address any concerns stakeholders may have about your assumptions. Actively listen to their doubts and respond with clear, evidence-based explanations. Show that you have considered multiple perspectives and that your assumptions are well-founded. By being responsive and open to feedback, you can transform skepticism into constructive dialogue, thereby strengthening the credibility of your financial models. This approach demonstrates thoroughness and fosters trust, ensuring stakeholders feel their concerns are acknowledged and addressed.
-
Asking a stakeholder to see the results from the other point of view (say an investor or a rating agency) could allow skeptics to understand why their numbers arent meant to be so different from what is being proposed. "Would you believe these numbers if we were pitching them to you as an outsider?"...
Rate this article
More relevant reading
-
Investment BankingHow can you identify potential risks when investing in the financial sector?
-
Critical ThinkingWhat are the best tools for identifying financial risks?
-
EconomicsHow can you use the Fama-French model to analyze financial asset performance?
-
Business ReportingHow can you make financial reports understandable for all stakeholders?