How would you handle a participant who is resistant to providing detailed feedback or insights?
Handling feedback resistance can be a challenging aspect of UX Research, but it's a situation you might encounter. When you're conducting user studies or interviews, the aim is to gather as much valuable insight as possible. However, sometimes participants may be hesitant or unwilling to provide the detailed feedback needed to inform design decisions. They might be shy, uncomfortable, or simply unsure about how to articulate their thoughts. It's crucial for you as a UX researcher to navigate these situations with tact and skill to ensure that the research objectives are met while maintaining a positive experience for the participant.
Building rapport is the first step in encouraging open communication. Start by making participants feel comfortable and valued. Explain the importance of their feedback and how it contributes to the project. Use simple, friendly language and be patient. Showing genuine interest in their opinions and experiences can make them more willing to share. Remember, a relaxed participant is more likely to provide useful insights.
-
Encourage open communication by asking specific, open-ended questions, offering reassurance about confidentiality, and explaining the importance of their feedback. If resistance continues, provide alternative methods for them to share their thoughts, like anonymous surveys or one-on-one discussions.
-
This article is a little off. Instead of tips for overcoming 'in-the-moment' situations of reluctant participants (as the title suggests), it is about how to proactively avoid the situation in the first place. In that context, these steps are fairly accurate. For those interested in the former, Here are some tips: 1. Take a moment to acknowledge the hesitation - having authentic empathy for their situation can create a mutual respect 2. Accept that you may not get any or all of the information - it is our job as UX researchers to balance our participant's experience with our research needs 3. No matter what leave the door open - be sure the participant has an easy way to send their thoughts to you privately at a later date
-
Handle a resistant participant by building rapport, asking open-ended questions, and ensuring a comfortable environment. Use prompts and examples to encourage detailed feedback, and remain patient and empathetic throughout the process.
Clearly setting expectations at the beginning of the session can alleviate participant anxiety. Explain the process, how long it will take, and what kind of feedback you're looking for. Assure them that there are no right or wrong answers and that their honest opinions are what matter most. This transparency can help participants understand the importance of their input and encourage them to be more forthcoming.
-
The paragraph is a bit strange, since you can only know that participants are reluctant after they've shown reluctance, but setting expectations is a good advice always. Make sure your expectation setting is to the point and not too long, or you'll either prime the participant to respond in a certain way, or come off as intimidating, and depending on the way you recruited them they might have expected something less formal. Make it short and sweet, and start building that rapport right away with your preliminary questions.
When you encounter resistance, ask open-ended questions that require more than a yes or no answer. These questions encourage participants to elaborate on their thoughts and feelings. For instance, instead of asking if they like a feature, ask them to describe their experience using it. This technique can help uncover deeper insights and get to the heart of user experience issues.
-
Here’s how open ended questions can help in such scenarios : 1. Frame questions that require more than a simple yes or no answer. This prompts participants to share their thoughts and experiences in greater detail. Eg. a. Instead of asking, “Do you like this feature?” ask, “Can you describe your experience using this feature?” b. Rather than saying, “Is this easy to use?” try, “What was your process when you used this?” 2. Follow up on their responses to gain deeper insights. Eg. If they express a positive reaction, inquire, “What aspects did you find most useful?” 3. Prompt participants to share stories about their interactions with the product. Eg. “Can you tell me about a time when you used this feature in a real-life scenario?”
Active listening involves paying close attention to what the participant is saying and showing that you understand. Reflect back what you hear and ask follow-up questions based on their responses. This not only validates the participant's feelings but also encourages them to expand on their thoughts. Active listening can break down barriers and lead to more detailed feedback.
-
We're all human! Show genuine interest in their thoughts by nodding, maintaining eye contact, and responding thoughtfully. Actively reflect on what they say to ensure you’ve understood correctly. For example, say, "It sounds like you found the navigation confusing. Can you tell me more about that?" This not only validates their feelings but also encourages them to share more detailed insights.
Sometimes traditional questioning doesn't work, and you need to adapt your approach. Use projective techniques like asking participants to compare the product to a car or a celebrity, or use sorting exercises with cards. These indirect methods can reveal subconscious thoughts and feelings about the user experience without putting the participant on the spot.
-
Sometimes, you need to switch up your approach to get participants to open up. If they’re not responding well to verbal questions, try other techniques like card sorting, usability tasks, or think-aloud protocols. These methods can make participants feel more engaged and less pressured, leading to more detailed and valuable feedback. Adjust your technique based on their comfort level and the context of your study.
Despite all efforts, some participants may still be reluctant to provide feedback. It's important to respect their boundaries and not push them too hard, as this could lead to discomfort or disengagement. Instead, thank them for their participation and move on. Sometimes, less is more, and even limited feedback can be valuable when interpreted correctly.
-
If your participants seem uncomfortable or unwilling to share, don’t push them too hard. Instead, gently remind them that their feedback is valuable and that there are no wrong answers. Let them know that it’s okay to share as much or as little as they feel comfortable with. Acknowledging their boundaries builds trust and can often lead to them opening up more as they feel safe and respected.
Rate this article
More relevant reading
-
Usability TestingWhat are the best techniques for moderating group discussions?
-
User ExperienceWhat do you do if your UX team lacks confidence and assertiveness?
-
User ExperienceWhat feedback techniques improve user interface and interaction design?
-
User ResearchWhat do you do if your feedback isn't fostering growth and development in UX Research?