How can you design RESTful APIs that support long polling and server-sent events?
RESTful APIs are web services that follow a set of principles and standards to provide a uniform and consistent interface for clients. They are widely used for building modern web applications that rely on data exchange and communication. However, some scenarios require the server to push data to the client without waiting for a request, such as real-time updates, notifications, or streaming. How can you design RESTful APIs that support long polling and server-sent events, two common techniques for achieving this functionality? In this article, we will explain the concepts, advantages, and challenges of these methods, and provide some tips and best practices for implementing them.
Long polling is a technique where the client sends a request to the server and waits for a response until there is some data available or a timeout occurs. The server does not close the connection immediately, but keeps it open until it has something to send back or the maximum time limit is reached. This way, the client can receive data from the server as soon as it is ready, without polling repeatedly or wasting bandwidth. Long polling can be implemented using standard HTTP methods and headers, such as GET, POST, and Content-Type. However, it also has some drawbacks, such as increased server load, latency, and compatibility issues with some proxies and firewalls.
-
For applications that need updates almost instantly, long polling is a technique that enables real-time communication between a client and a server. Although it offers a straightforward method of achieving real-time functionality, WebSockets and other more recent options might be more effective in this regard. Nevertheless, Long Polling can still be a useful option for accomplishing asynchronous communication between clients and servers in specific situations or when working with legacy systems.
-
REST Long Polling is an asynchronous communication method where the client sends a request, and the server keeps the connection open until data is available or a timeout occurs. Advantage: It reduces network overhead and enhances responsiveness by avoiding constant connection reestablishment. Disadvantage: Potential latency in real-time data delivery; servers may face scalability issues due to long-open connections, consuming resources. Consider these trade-offs when deciding to implement Long Polling in a system.
-
Why would you use long polling when websockets are available? Isn't long polling simply the backup transport for websockets?
-
Long polling, a client-server communication technique, involves the client sending a request, and the server keeping the connection open until data is available or a timeout occurs. This minimizes the need for repeated polling, optimizing bandwidth usage. Implementable via standard HTTP methods, it provides real-time data updates. Yet, challenges like heightened server load, latency, and compatibility concerns with proxies and firewalls should be considered. While offering immediate data transmission, long polling demands careful assessment for its impact on server performance and potential obstacles in certain network environments.
Server-sent events (SSE) are a feature of HTML5 that allow the server to send data to the client in a one-way stream, using a special MIME type called text/event-stream. The client establishes a persistent connection with the server using the EventSource interface, and listens for events that contain data and optional fields, such as id, event, and retry. The server can send multiple events over the same connection, and the client can handle them using event listeners or callbacks. SSE are more efficient and reliable than long polling, as they reduce the overhead of opening and closing connections, and support automatic reconnection and event buffering. However, they also have some limitations, such as lack of support for binary data and CORS requests, and lower browser compatibility than long polling.
-
This approach minimizes connection overhead by eliminating the need for repeated connection setups, enhancing efficiency compared to techniques like long polling. SSE's support for automatic reconnection and event buffering further bolsters reliability. However, considerations include limitations on binary data support, challenges with CORS requests, and slightly lower browser compatibility when compared to long polling. Despite these constraints, SSE emerges as a powerful tool for real-time data transmission, providing developers with a robust and efficient mechanism for server-client communication in web applications.
When deciding between long polling and SSE, consider the type and frequency of data, the network and server conditions, the client capabilities, and the security requirements. Generally, you may want to use long polling if you need to support older browsers or non-web clients, or if you need to send binary data or cross-origin requests. On the other hand, SSE is best for leveraging HTML5 features, sending frequent and small updates, or streaming data continuously. Additionally, a hybrid approach or a third-party library or framework that abstracts the underlying technique and provides a uniform interface may be beneficial.
No matter which technique you decide to use, there are some best practices for designing RESTful APIs that support long polling and SSE. This includes using descriptive and consistent resource names and HTTP methods that reflect the data exchange, as well as appropriate status codes and headers to indicate the request and response state. Additionally, you should use either JSON or XML as the data format while including metadata and links to make parsing and navigating the data easier. Query parameters or request headers can be used to specify client preferences or options such as timeout duration, event type, or content type. To enhance performance and efficiency, caching and compression techniques should be utilized. Finally, authentication and encryption mechanisms should be employed to secure the data and prevent unauthorized access.
-
Yes we need to secure the project before exposing to end user and for that we require to choose a technique which suits and we should design taking this in consideration
-
Consider incorporating versioning in your API to ensure backward compatibility as it evolves. Employing HATEOAS (Hypermedia as the Engine of Application State) can enhance discoverability by including links in responses, guiding clients through the application flow. Lastly, implement meaningful error handling with clear messages to assist developers in troubleshooting and resolving issues effectively.
Finally, you should test and debug your RESTful APIs that support long polling and SSE. To do this, you can use curl or Postman to send and receive HTTP requests and responses, and inspect the headers and body of the data. Additionally, Chrome DevTools or Firefox Developer Tools can be used to inspect the network activity and the EventSource object, as well as view the events and data received by the client. Load testing tools such as JMeter or LoadRunner can be used to generate and handle concurrent requests and responses, measuring the response time, throughput, and resource consumption of the server. Logging and tracing tools like Log4j or Zipkin can also be used to record and analyze events and errors that occur during data exchange, helping to identify the root cause of any problems.
-
To have added confidence in integration testing, tests can be made more deterministic by using a fixed configuration and mocked server that responses at a fixed time. This makes it much simpler to automate validations in a safe and reliable manner.
-
If long polling is a requirement I think the application could be reviewed, maybe needs an improved architecture to reduce the request and response time? Considering other options: In modern web applications the use of other protocols like MQTT, WebSocket, Kafka, DDS or implementing Pub/Sub with Redis, RabbitMQ, aws SQS for background processing can provide better experiences since it provides an asynchronous data flow with a persistent connection. It probably is more code and overkill on small projects but using http for requests with an unexpected response time doesn't seem appropriate.
Rate this article
More relevant reading
-
IT OperationsHow can you ensure OAuth performance under heavy traffic?
-
Computer ScienceHow can you build a web application that can handle any traffic?
-
ProgrammingHow can you use Nginx for web service integration and interoperability?
-
Software EngineeringWhat are the best practices for scaling your Web API?