"a 'State's purposeful or deliberate denial to Negroes on account of race of participation as jurors in the administration of justice violates the Equal�...
In the case of Holland v. Illinois, the U.S. Supreme Court held that a race-based peremptory dismissal of black veniremen did not violate a white�...
Petitioner asserts that the prosecutor intentionally used his peremptory challenges to strike all black prospective jurors solely on the basis of their race,�...
Opinions � Petitioner � Respondent � Docket no. � Decided by � Lower court � Citation � Argued � Decided. Jan 22, 1990. Advocates. Donald S�...
People also ask
What was the significance of Munn v Illinois?
How did Munn vs Illinois affect farmers?
What was the verdict of Munn v Illinois?
What was Munn vs Illinois Apush?
The sixth amendment to the United States Constitution guarantees a de- fendant in a criminal proceeding the right to trial by an impartial jury.' This.
& Supreme Court Of The United States. (1989) U.S. Reports: Holland v. Illinois, 493 U.S. 474 . [Periodical] Retrieved from the Library of Congress, https://www.
Under Holland v. Illinois, 493 U.S. 474, 110 S. Ct. 803, 107 L. Ed. 2d 905 (1990), the Sixth Amendment does not prohibit the prosecution from exercising its�...
A prohibition upon the exclusion of cognizable groups through peremp- tory challenges has no conceivable basis in the text of the Sixth. Amendment 3 .
Jefferson Edward Howeth, Holland v. Illinois: The Supreme Court Narrows the Scope of Protection Against Discriminatory Jury Selection Procedures, 48 Wash. & Lee�...
Alice Biedenbender, Holland v. Illinois: A Sixth Amendment Attack on the Use of Discriminatrory Peremptory Challenges, 40 Cath. U. L. Rev. 651 (1991).