On appeal, the Illinois Supreme Court upheld the convictions and rejected petitioner's Sixth Amendment challenge to the exclusion of black jurors. Held: 1.
In the case of Holland v. Illinois, the U.S. Supreme Court held that a race-based peremptory dismissal of black veniremen did not violate a white�...
On appeal, the Illinois Supreme Court upheld the convictions and rejected petitioner's Sixth Amendment challenge to the exclusion of black jurors. Held: 1.
People also ask
What is the 6th Amendment?
What was state vs allen illinois?
Petitioner. Holland ; Respondent. Illinois ; Docket no. 88-5050 ; Decided by. Rehnquist Court ; Lower court. Supreme Court of Illinois�...
Description: U.S. Reports Volume 493; October Term, 1989; Holland v. Illinois. Call Number/Physical Location. Call Number: KF101; Series: Criminal Law and�...
Alice Biedenbender, Holland v. Illinois: A Sixth Amendment Attack on the Use of Discriminatrory Peremptory Challenges, 40 Cath. U. L. Rev. 651 (1991). Available�...
Jefferson Edward Howeth, Holland v. Illinois: The Supreme Court Narrows the Scope of Protection Against Discriminatory Jury Selection Procedures, 48 Wash. & Lee�...
Dippel, Debra L. (1991) "Holland v. Illinois: Sixth Amendment Fair Cross-Section Requirement Does Not Preclude Racially-Based Peremptory Challenges," Akron Law�...
Under Holland v. Illinois, 493 U.S. 474, 110 S. Ct. 803, 107 L. Ed. 2d 905 (1990), the Sixth Amendment does not prohibit the prosecution from exercising its�...
A prohibition upon the exclusion of cognizable groups through peremp- tory challenges has no conceivable basis in the text of the Sixth. Amendment 3 .