In Consequentialism Reconsidered, Carlson strives to find a plausible formulation of the structural part of consequentialism.

This book argues that critics of consequentialism have not been able to make a successful and comprehensive case against all versions of consequentialism because they have been using the wrong methodology.

In this book, therefore, he undertakes to reconsider the rejection of consequentialism.

It is one of the most influential, and controversial, of all ethical theories. In this book, Julia Driver introduces and critically assesses consequentialism in all its forms.

This volume of new essays on new wave consequentialism initiates and stimulates novel lines of discussions among proponents and their critics.

... consequentialism. The debates thus focused on developing a proper—and often complex—axiological basis (to ... Reconsidered. 32 Hooker, Ideal Code, Real World; Hooker et al., Morality, Rules, and Consequences. 33 Slote, Common�...

This is a book about morality, rationality, and the interconnections between the two.

... consequentialism will be the most plausible forms of consequentialism.33 References Almeida, M. 1992. “The ... Reconsidered. Dordrecht, the Netherlands: Kluwer. Casta�eda, H. 1968. “A Problem for Utilitarianism.” Analysis 28�...

... Consequentialism Reconsidered. Dordrecht: Kluwer. Carr, Jennifer. 2015. Epistemic Expansions. Res Philosophica 92:217–36. Cote-Bouchard, Charles. 2016. Can the Aim of Belief Ground Epistemic CLAYTON LITTLEJOHN 45 References.

This Oxford Handbook contains thirty-two previously unpublished contributions by top moral philosophers examining the current state of play in consequentialism and pointing to new directions for future research.