|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
my rating |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
0063076098
| 9780063076099
| 0063076098
| 4.48
| 145,381
| Oct 05, 2021
| Oct 05, 2021
|
really liked it
| Having never heard the song, I followed along as best I could but had to wonder why the hell he was going to all the trouble of teaching me somethi Having never heard the song, I followed along as best I could but had to wonder why the hell he was going to all the trouble of teaching me something that no one would ever hear. Maybe he was just lonely and wanted to jam? Maybe he was graciously making some no-name kid’s dream come true by inviting me to play along with him, knowing that it was a story I would get to tell for the rest of my life? As strange as it seemed, I kept focused on his strumming hand and locked into the arrangement, banging it out like we WERE in a sold-out stadium. We ended in unison on a triumphant final crash. I was recently on a long road trip with my brother and The Storyteller is the only one of the several audiobooks we listened to that I liked enough to want to log. Read engagingly and conversationally by Dave Grohl himself, he comes across as a likeable guy; and as he’s about the same age as me and my brother, the cultural touchstones Grohl references were all familiar to us and cemented rapport. Listening to this memoir is like talking to a stranger at a bar — a stranger with an interesting catalogue of stories dealing with coincidences and celebrity encounters (that opening passage is about being asked to jam with Iggy Pop at the Rivoli in Toronto when Grohl was the unknown teenage drummer for the indie punk band Scream: Grohl has countless stories like this) — and because he is a stranger, it’s understandable that he doesn’t get too personal; Grohl is also talking to strangers here, not a therapist or trusted confidante. This might not be what Nirvana (or even Foo Fighters) fans are looking for, and I had enough moments of irk to think of this as a 3.5 star “read”, but Grohl is just so undeniably likeable that I’m rounding up to four. I noticed Paul McCartney out of the corner of my eye, chatting away with friends, and I couldn’t help but stare. There. He. Was. I don’t know what it feels like to see a UFO. I don’t know what it feels like to see a ghost. I don’t know what it feels like to see Bigfoot. But I know what it feels like to see Paul McCartney, and if that’s not a supernatural event, then I don’t know what is. I tried to avert my eyes, but it was no use. I was mesmerized. Most of my moments of irk are referenced by this passage (which comes from a bonus story after the credits in the audiobook). I see many other reviewers were put off by Grohl’s habit of jumping around in time, which really didn’t bother me until this story — of being invited to the celebrity tribute concert for George Harrison and feeling out of place at the VIP afterparty until he saw some familiar faces. And when he mentions Paul McCartney here, it’s because it was the first time they met, even though we had already heard many stories of the two of them becoming the best of friends over the years (Sir Paul even gave Grohl’s daughter an impromptu piano lesson while visiting his home), and I realised I had no idea where in the timeline of Grohl's career this story occurred. More context would have helped. I was also irked by Grohl’s persistent insistence that he’s surprised every time “real” celebrities know who he is. Just as he apparently couldn’t believe that Dhani Harrison would give him box seats to the tribute concert and access to that “Valhalla” of an afterparty, Grohl was shocked when Tom Petty asked him to back him on drums for an SNL performance, didn’t understand why he would be asked to play Blackbird at the 2016 Oscars (which Paul McCartney declared to be “cheeky” with a finger wag), or that Elton John would get out of his car and walk down the sidewalk to shake Grohl’s hand in London. Yes, Mr Grohl, just as you get excited to meet Little Richard and Joan Jett, it’s hard to believe that you’re always surprised when other musicians are excited to meet you. And I was also a little irked to realise that Grohl is a bit flaky. He believes that he manifested his eventual success during a teenaged ceremony before his literal shrine to John Bonham, he used a ouija board to contact the spirits haunting his Seattle home, and he shares the fact that a French psychic once told him that his lifelong dreams of alien abduction are no dreams (which begs the question of why this former resident of the Pacific Northwest also denies ever seeing Bigfoot in the last passage…) I also found his nonstop alcohol consumption to be flaky: it’s not counterculture punk to complain about being charged with a DUI when you actually blow over the limit, even if you’re driving a moped that you consider to be “as much of a motor vehicle as a riding lawn mower” (which is also illegal to drive down the street while impaired; I don’t care how high you think your “tolerance” is.) Honestly: Grohl seems to drink a lot (his pre-show ritual includes three Advil, three beers, and a shot of Crown Royal), and this constant reference to unexamined excess feels flaky. On the other hand: you get the sense that Grohl totally earned his place in the rock ‘n roll pantheon. He had an authentic early connection with music, practised drumming on pillows in his childhood bedroom (where he had no space for an actual drumset) ‘til his fingers bled, dropped out of high school to tour with Scream with his mother’s qualified blessing (“YOU'D BETTER BE GOOD”) and his absent Republican speechwriter father’s condemnation (“AND STAY OFF THE DRUGS!!!”), sleeping in a van as they toured the country and then the world, surviving on the three-for-ninety-nine-cents corn dog special at the local gas station while jamming with the yet-to-break-through Nirvana. Kurt Cobain was only one of the close friends that Grohl would lose over the years (and the book was written before Taylor Hawkins’ sudden death), and overall, I was left glad that it all worked out for this relatable, likeable, hard-working guy. He earned this. I firmly believe that your understanding or “version” of love is learned by example from day one, and it becomes your divining rod in life, for better or worse. A foundation for all meaningful relationships to stand upon. I surely have my mother to thank for mine. I LOVE MY CHILDREN AS I WAS LOVED AS A CHILD. AND I PRAY THAT THEY WILL DO THE SAME WHEN THEIR TIME COMES. SOME CYCLES ARE MEANT TO BE BROKEN. SOME ARE MEANT TO BE REINFORCED. (I also read reviews in which people were bothered by Grohl’s frequent use of all-caps. Having listened to this on audio, I wasn’t affected by them, so I was surprised to see that this passage included all-caps in this way; make of them what you will.) Many of the stories here are about Grohl’s mother and daughters (curiously, others — like his wife and sister — are only mentioned in passing), and I think that this cycle of love and support is the main message that Grohl wanted to get across in The Storyteller. This isn’t really a no-holds-barred rock ‘n roll memoir (although there are plenty of rock-related stories), and this isn’t really an introspective and intimate examination of a life (although I now know more about Dave Grohl than I ever expected to), but if you met a stranger at a bar — congenially knocking back Coors Light and tequila shots — who spent the evening telling you a bunch of crazy-but-true stories, a stranger who has spent a long time on the road and might therefore be forgiven for wanting to show you pictures of his family, you’d probably have a pretty good time. And I had a pretty good time with this. Audiobook recommended. ...more |
Notes are private!
|
1
|
May 13, 2024
|
May 14, 2024
|
May 14, 2024
|
Hardcover
| |||||||||||||||
1668010909
| 9781668010907
| 1668010909
| 4.00
| 170
| Jul 16, 2024
| Jul 16, 2024
|
really liked it
| This is the genius of Judy Blume. It’s the single most important aspect of her legacy. Her work as a children’s writer did something nobody else co This is the genius of Judy Blume. It’s the single most important aspect of her legacy. Her work as a children’s writer did something nobody else could manage: it helped ensure feminism’s longevity…A movement requires a multigenerational buy-in to maintain its momentum. And over in suburban New Jersey, a soft-spoken stay-at-home mom was listening. Writing cutting-edge books for kids, Judy Blume became the Second Wave’s secret weapon. There are several biographies of Judy Blume out there — most written thirty or more years ago — and author Rachelle Bergstein quotes from all of them. But what makes The Genius of Judy a special read is the way that Bergstein, with the benefit of looking back across the intervening decades and their shifting social and political climates, is able to give us the context in which Blume filled her literary niche and was able to positively influence countless young readers. From S. E. Hinton’s The Outsiders paving the way for more realistic young adult fiction to Erica Jong’s Fear of Flying giving voice to the modern woman’s existential malaise, Bergstein sets Blume in her cultural moment, explaining what a necessary force her books were for allowing girls to understand and take control of their own bodies. That’s no small thing; it’s everything, and it’s somehow under threat again today. The Genius of Judy traces Blume’s releases — sharing the stories of their inspiration, their plotlines, and reception — while also giving us the story of Blume’s life throughout the years; from unfulfilled suburban housewife to free speech activist. As a Gen X woman, Blume’s novels were hugely influential in forming my own outlook, and I have to admit, I took her for granted: I never once considered that for me to read these books, someone out there had to be thinking deeply on what was needed and taking risks to get them published. I truly appreciate the context that Bergstein supplies here and that I had the opportunity to revisit, and better understand, these formative reads from my youth. (Note: I read an ARC through NetGalley and passages quoted may not be in their final forms.) Are You There God?, Deenie, and Forever form a triptych, with eleven-year-old Margaret, thirteen-year-old Deenie, and seventeen-year-old Katherine creating a progressive portrait of the new American girl. All three are smart, spunky, and in touch with their bodies. They’re all white, middle class, and from the suburbs — Judy wrote what she knew — but together, they embody an ideal for Blume that transcended race or class. The trio offers a vision of how the up-and-coming generation could digest the feminist and sexual revolutions. They’re good girls with a twist; they’re all in touch with sexuality, but they have futures. Those three novels were hugely influential to me as a girl in the late 70s, and mostly because I read each of them, years apart, at the exact right time — I needed the information and was ready to absorb it — and I remember that something about reading them felt transgressive; as though I was uncovering secret information about my body (how shameful!) that had been actively hidden from me. But I wasn’t reading Judy Blume anymore in the 80s (I never have picked up her adult novels; I think I want to preserve my memories of Blume in an unexamined amber of nostalgia) and I was oblivious to the periodic, and ongoing, bans that her novels have been subject to since then. Bergstein tells a fascinating story of those who have attempted to remove novels from schools and public libraries — from the Reagan era Moral Majority to Florida governor Ron DeSantis — and Blume’s efforts, in conjunction with the National Coalition Against Censorship, to keep not only her own novels but other often often-banned books (Slaughterhouse-Five, Catcher in the Rye, etc.) available to those who want them. Whether or not you’ve been reading Judy Blume, she’s been fighting behind the scenes to promote feminism and fight censorship. In the end, Bergstein acknowledges that Blume’s books have fallen out of fashion — even the 2023 theatrical release of an adaptation of Are You There God? It’s Me, Margaret is a nostalgic blast from the past — and she laments that despite the YA book market exploding with lots of frank and explicit material (Forever, which shook teenaged me, is so sweet in retrospect), there’s something essential in Blume’s novels that is missing in today's cultural landscape: What’s still missing from a lot of contemporary sex ed is an exploration of the way sex intersects with relationships, experts say. Even today, very few parents and educators are prepared to discuss the way dynamics of care and safety and vulnerability all contribute to true intimacy, which is crucial for a satisfying love life. That’s what Judy innately understood how to do. She taught us about our bodies and our hearts through her stories. Periods are something that happens to a whole friend group. First teenage love affects the entire family. Boys experience heartbreak, too! Truly safe intercourse requires talking and planning. You can’t go back to holding hands. I’m so glad I read this book: I am delighted to have both learned so much more about Judy Blume’s true legacy and to have had this journey back to my own younger self; in so many ways, Judy Blume set key stones in the foundation of who I am and I hope that the young readers of today find their way to similarly good, foundational material. ...more |
Notes are private!
|
1
|
Apr 25, 2024
|
Apr 26, 2024
|
Apr 26, 2024
|
Hardcover
| |||||||||||||||
1685890709
| 9781685890704
| 1685890709
| 4.56
| 45
| unknown
| Apr 16, 2024
|
it was amazing
| The knowledge base of natural history is under threat as research funding is increasingly focussed on fast-paced, short-term experimental work over The knowledge base of natural history is under threat as research funding is increasingly focussed on fast-paced, short-term experimental work over the slower-paced, longer-term observational work necessary to build and maintain it. I felt compelled to write this book because it seems to be a problem that everyone in biological research and almost no one outside of it is aware of. Like many of the extinctions quietly proceeding around the world, it just isn’t something we hear about. We as citizens and stewards of this planet owe it to ourselves and our children to be aware not only of the issue but of the opportunities we have to contribute to its solution. Unrooted is one scientist’s story of what led her to the field of Botany, the changes she witnessed within the grind of academia as she pursued her PhD, and the impossibility of finding employment in her field after proudly earning her doctorate (a situation made dramatically worse once she became a mother). Erin Zimmerman writes in a clear and engaging voice — whether describing the electric jolt of reading Charles Darwin’s own handwriting on a specimen’s label at the Royal Botanic Gardens, Kew, or the indignity of having to squirrel herself away in a musty change room to pump breast milk as a postdoc, this is a beautiful blend of memoir, science history, and an impassioned defence of the importance of her disappearing field of expertise. This is exactly the sort of thing I like — I learned a lot and was affected, heart and mind; I couldn’t ask for more and wish Dr Zimmerman nothing but success. (Note: I read an ARC through NetGalley and passages quoted may not be in their final forms.) Sitting down to my stack of herbarium specimens and alcohol-preserved flowers every day felt like losing myself in a good book. Scientific research topics can seem narrow to the point of absurdity, like an entire career spent on a single species, but ask any scientist, and they’ll tell you that there really is a lifetime’s worth of discovery there. It speaks to the complexity of our universe that even the thinnest slices can be so expansive. To me, sustained, close attention to a little-regarded slice of that universe felt spiritual, like time spent in quiet worship before a vast and intricate cosmos, trying to know it just a little bit better. Technically a taxonomist (Zimmerman could spend whole days in close scrutiny of plant parts, sketching what she saw with the delightfully anachronistic use of pen and ink) with an eventual focus on Dialiinae (in the legume family, but more exotic than just peas and beans), Zimmerman’s work was not unlike that of the early collectors like Joseph Banks and Alexander von Humboldt. What was particularly fascinating to me was to learn that Herbariums around the world are filled with thousands of samples dating back to the days of these early world-wide adventurers, some of them hundreds of years old, which have never been through the hands of a trained taxonomist (and even if some of these sample types have already been described, each unique sample — with its known date and location of collection, along with anything peculiar to the sample itself — would contain a wealth of information about climate, the environment, and challenges to growth). But as Zimmerman made her way through her postgraduate work, she watched as the discipline of Botany was folded into generic Biology departments, those researchers who were known in the field as taxonomists were changing their focus to computer-aided dna analysis (because that’s where the funding is), and even her own future husband dropped out of academia to pursue an education with a guaranteed job at the end. Zimmerman makes the case that the sort of work she did — slow and methodical, at the human scale — is imperative for making the kind of discoveries that make people care about the world and its disappearing species; as Damon Little of the New York Botanical Garden said, “If something doesn’t have a name, you can’t conserve it.” (It is estimated that there are 350 000 or more unknown/unnamed plant species.) I appreciated everything Zimmerman shares about her experience as a woman in science — from some incredible female mentors to the male supervisor who patronisingly spoke to her with a hand on her knee — and her historical overview of women in the field (from sample collecting seen as a gentile hobby for gentlewomen, to men erecting an ivory tower around the field when they decided to make Botany a “serious” science), and as she watched the pathway to tenure become ever narrower in her field of expertise (less than twenty-five per cent of PhDs will eventually find themselves with a tenured position), the reality of motherhood seemed to close that door to Zimmerman for good. There was no one dramatic incident that extinguished my desire to be in research. What I’d faced was an environment in which I was under strong pressure to never need accommodation, to never let anyone see that I had other loyalties in my life. It was a death by a thousand tiny cuts. And that’s what makes this story important, because I suspect that’s how it is for many of the nearly half of all women in science who leave after becoming mothers. Each time you’re made to feel unprofessional for having caregiving responsibilities, each time you’re made to feel like a burden for requesting minor accommodation . . . it wears you down a little more. You believe that you are the problem. And when the reward at the end of those years of hard work and low pay are far from assured, it doesn’t take a PhD to figure out you might be happier and better off elsewhere, no matter how much you loved the actual science and the questions you were trying to answer. Unrooted ends on a positive note — Zimmerman has found a career in science writing that allows her to balance her work and family responsibilities — but she continues to stress that Botany matters in our threatened world. I loved everything about this — the science, the exposé of persistent sexism and grant-chasing in academia, and Zimmerman’s personal history — and would recommend this to anyone who enjoyed Lab Girl or Braiding Sweetgrass. ...more |
Notes are private!
|
1
|
Apr 17, 2024
|
Apr 18, 2024
|
Apr 17, 2024
|
Hardcover
| |||||||||||||||
1797141651
| 9781797141657
| unknown
| 3.92
| 781
| Mar 03, 2022
| Jul 12, 2022
|
really liked it
| The whaling captain’s wife gave me a beer, which came in a small can and a piece of whale heart to eat. The meat was chewy, did not easily shred or The whaling captain’s wife gave me a beer, which came in a small can and a piece of whale heart to eat. The meat was chewy, did not easily shred or disintegrate into fibres. It was clearly part of a whole, carried a message about entirety. After I swallowed it, I sat still and quiet. It took me down into the ocean, sounding, down below the light where benign goliaths swam by. Adding to the trend of memoir through scientific investigation, environmental journalist Doreen Cunningham, at the lowest point in her life — unemployed single mother, living in a women’s hostel on the island of Jersey, with no prospect for improvement — made the rash decision to take out a large loan and bring along her two year old son on a loosely-planned adventure: to follow a pod of grey whales, from their birthing grounds off the Mexico coast, to their feeding grounds in the Aleutian Islands. Although she had no prior interest in grey whales specifically, Cunningham was entranced when she learned that theirs was about the longest annual migration of any mammal. And she had a secondary motive: to make her way back to the small Alaskan village of Utqiagvik and the man she had met and fallen in love with there, seven years earlier. Soundings is the narrative of these two adventures — with frequent interspersals of the story of Cunningham’s childhood on the island of Jersey, up to the challenging relationship with her son’s father and subsequent custody battle — and I found the whole thing to be charming. I liked Cunningham’s voice, I admired her chutzpah, and although her connection to whales felt a little bit tenuous, as an environmental journalist, I appreciated her explanation that whales are signal species, and their fate is our fate. I loved everything about this. From there everything happened quickly. A string was pulling me, out of the window, into the sky, across the sea. The next day I left the hostel and moved into a friend’s attic room. I got a loan, organised visas. We would follow the mothers and babies from Mexico to the top of the world, I told Max. They would swim, and we would take the bus, the train, and the boat alongside them. I told myself I would relearn from the whales how to mother, how to endure, how to live. Beneath the surface, secretly, I longed to get back to northernmost Alaska, to the community who kept me safe in the harsh beauty of the Arctic and to Billy, the whale hunter who’d loved me. In Cunningham’s narrative “now”, we tag along as she attempts to wrangle an energetic toddler onto buses, trains, and charter boats along the western coast of North America; forever just making connections, cursing foggy views, and always just a day or two behind the migrating whales. This narrative is thoroughly human and relatable. In her intermittent story of seven years prior, she was on sabbatical from the BBC, with a bursary to help her study anything she liked, and initially, she intended to travel across the top of Alaska and Canada, asking the Indigenous peoples along the way about their lived experience with climate change. But when she arrived at her first stop of Utqiagvik and was invited by its Iñupiaq people to witness an upcoming bowhead whale hunt, Cunningham decided to stay put, soon finding a warmth and acceptance from these people that she had never before known. This narrative thread is engaging and exciting, with gorgeous nature writing of the frozen north, as well as a blossoming love story. The third thread — with stories from an unhappy family life and the fractious pony that was her only childhood balm — we learn something of what made Cunningham the woman she would become. Along the way, she shares facts about whales and climate change — although this really isn’t a science-forward book — and for me, this sort of adventure-as-memoir really works. Here comes the grey whale from the beginning of time, say the fossils. They pose a question too: All this you know, now what? Human thought and intention are part of the global ecosystem, the most powerful driver of change, the most powerful obstacle that both we and the whales have encountered through millennia. We are writing the next chapter of the story of all life on earth. This is more lyrical than one might expect from an “environmental journalist” (Cunningham is working at the BBC once more, encouraged that there’s no longer a policy in place to give time to a sceptic every time an actual climate scientist talks), and if the following doesn’t turn you off, you might enjoy this as much as I did (I’ll admit it’s a bit precious, but I like her): I am woman, human, animal. I bore my child in water. We sang to the whales. We listened to them breathing. We listened to the sea. This book is what I heard. ...more |
Notes are private!
|
1
|
Apr 13, 2024
|
Apr 13, 2024
|
Apr 13, 2024
|
Audiobook
| |||||||||||||||
1797139894
| 9781797139890
| unknown
| 3.65
| 2,358
| Sep 27, 2022
| Jun 14, 2022
|
really liked it
| Most of the world’s wetlands came into being as the last ice age melted, gurgled and gushed. In ancient days fens, bogs, swamps and marine estuarie Most of the world’s wetlands came into being as the last ice age melted, gurgled and gushed. In ancient days fens, bogs, swamps and marine estuaries were the earth’s most desirable and dependable resource places, attracting and supporting myriad species. The diversity and numbers of living creatures in springtime wetlands and overhead must have made a stupefying roar audible from afar. We wouldn’t know. As humans have multiplied to a scary point of concern about the carrying capacity of the earth, wetlands were drained and dried for agriculture and housing. Today 7.8 billion people jostle for living space in a time of political ferment, a global pandemic and now a war, trying to ignore increasingly violent weather events as the climate crisis intensifies. Fen, Bog and Swamp is Annie Proulx’s love letter to the earth’s disappearing wetlands and a warning that, as extreme weather events increase, our impulse to drain “useless lands” for development is action we take at our own peril: just as Hurricane Katrina wouldn’t have hit New Orleans so hard had the natural mud-bearing outflow of the Mississippi River not been impeded for decades, Indonesia is currently removing their shoreline-protecting mangrove forests in order to plant oil palms — and at what future cost? With beautiful writing, engaging literary references, and urgent information, I found this to be both rewarding and necessary. Early northern Europeans lived and prospered among glacial meltwater wetlands for thousands of years. And what if those old people who venerated springs, pools and wetlands as holy places could look into the future and see us? Surely they would be unable to comprehend humans who dirtied, drained and destroyed water sources, who dammed and polluted rivers, who choked the great oceans with debris and plastic. Proulx begins by defining and differentiating between the three titular types of wetlands and then features a section on each. In addition to describing the natural world supported by each of the three, I was intrigued by the fact that Proulx seemed to really focus on the people who have historically lived in each ecosystem. She describes Doggerland (an area of land that once connected Britain with continental Europe, now submerged beneath the North Sea) and then moves on to the Fenlanders who occupied the hillocky fens of eastern England, with a rich and self-sufficient culture, from Mesolithic times until the Enclosure Acts (which put all common lands into the hands of the wealthy few). When writing on bogs, Proulx describes the generations-long tradition of using peat for home heating (recently banned) and the ancient “bog people” found interred in Celtic lands; the hints given of their shamanic culture by artefacts left behind. In the section on swamps, Proulx primarily writes about those in the United States; over fifty per cent of which have been drained, primarily for agriculture. The good news is that in every one of these areas, efforts are underway to rehabilitate at least a portion of the wetlands. Painters, sculptors, photographers, poets, archeologists, storytellers, ecologists, botanist succumb to the allure of the bog world, where moss makes its own ecological habitat, trees dare not put down roots, predatory sundews and pitcher plants eat living swamp meat, where bog cotton “breathes” through its air-channeled stems. Everything seems to lurch slightly, to sink and rise fractions of an inch. Decomposing plant material underwater sends up stinking gas that produces the mysterious light that wobbles through evening mists — the famous will-o’-the-wisp or ignus fatuus (fool’s light). In sunlight there is the swamp sparrow’s rapid iteration like a gear in your brain spinning loose. The profoundly unfamiliar setting is not so much a place as the sudden shock of perception of threatened existence, a realization streaked with anxiety. I enjoyed Proulx’s frequent referencing of art (those old paintings and scientific diagrams that capture something of lost landscapes) and literature: From Kate Marsden (intrepid missionary-nurse who wrote in 1891 of underground “zombie fires” in the Siberian wilderness) and Alexander Pope (whose eighteenth century idea of genius loci urged landscape designers to keep in mind the “genius” or spirit of natural areas) to the settings of fens and moors that feature in the more familiar writings of Conan Doyle, Saki, and Nabokov — even the fact that Robert Frost had contemplated suicide in the Great Dismal Swamp when his marriage proposal had been rejected — Proulx repeatedly, and urgently, makes the point that the wetlands have always loomed large in the human imagination. On the upside, the fact that these stories exist can remind us to lament the lost landscapes: The relatively small Limberlost Swamp in northeast Indiana served as the setting for Girl of the Limberlost, and it was a love for this 1904 novel that prompted locals in the 1990s to purchase some of the original swamp acreage and begin to rehabilitate it. Hope, and seeing where action has had a positive effect, is the first step to change: It is easy to think of the vast wetland losses as a tragedy and to believe with hopeless conviction that the past cannot be retrieved — tragic and part of our climate crisis anguish. But as we see how valuable wetlands can soften the shocks of change, and how eagerly nature responds to concerned care, the public is beginning to regard the natural world in a different way. Lovely, urgent read. ...more |
Notes are private!
|
1
|
Apr 12, 2024
|
Apr 12, 2024
|
Apr 13, 2024
|
Audiobook
| |||||||||||||||
0451210530
| 9780451210531
| 0451210530
| 4.21
| 11,291
| Jun 06, 2004
| Jun 01, 2004
|
really liked it
| So long and sorry, darling So long and sorry, darling On April 4, 1991, author Jeanine Cummins’ nineteen-year-old brother Tom and their similarly aged cousins Julie and Robin Kerry went for a late-night walk on the Old Chain of Rocks Bridge outside St. Louis, Missouri to look at the graffiti. While there, they were the victims of random and horrific violence, and as one can imagine, this permanently altered the course of the lives of the entire Cummins family. A Rip in Heaven is Jeanine Cummins’ effort to relay her family’s side of the story – she makes the valid point that our true crime obsessed society focusses much more on perpetrators than victims – and not only does she tell a harrowing story of the attack itself, but its aftermath – missteps and manipulation by the police and media – is a gut-wrenching tale in its own right. From the prologue, Cummins promises thoroughness without pretending to be unbiased (fair enough), and especially for what it commemorates of the bright and beautiful souls of Julie and Robin Kerry, I am glad that this exists. They came into the clearing suddenly and the moon opened up above them, lighting the cracked and broken concrete that stretched like the decaying bones of giants between them and the abandoned Old Chain of Rocks Bridge. Tom stopped dead in his tracks, causing Robin to stumble into his back. He willed himself to move forward but he felt stuck, mesmerized by the menacing old bridge that loomed up before him. The massive steel structure was wild with leaves, and the undergrowth near the base was dense and uninviting. A few enormous hanging vines dangled from the top of the bridge’s skeleton, and they shifted and swayed eerily in the darkness. To get the negative out of the way: as other reviewers have noted, it was an odd choice for Cummins to have written this nonfiction narrative in an omniscient third person – it is emotionally distancing and doesn’t reinforce the veracity – and it was even more odd for her to refer to herself, exclusively, by her cutesy family nickname, “Tink”. I don’t want to go over the details of the attack, immediate aftermath, or court cases here, but do want to note how chilling it seems that the sisters may have anticipated their own early deaths: Robin coming right out and telling their mom what she would want at her funeral if she were to die young; the poet, Julie, having written these words: My dreams take me down To rocks and the cold current below And I have lost myself In the water’s wailing drone That lulls me to sleep These two young social activist women do sound remarkable and I did see the irony in their families hoping for the death penalty for their killers, while they themselves had been members of Amnesty International (yet, like Cummins, I found it distasteful when AI members of the chapter from their own university held a “die in” in support of their killers; how easily we lose sight of the real victims.) I also want to note that Cummins sounds fair in her descriptions of the four perpetrators: for the most part, theirs were not happy, supported childhoods. We forget our victims. As a society we have a certain fascination with murder and violence. It’s not necessarily unhealthy — we are a curious people. We want to know why atrocities happen; we want to understand the causes of wickedness. We go looking for answers in books, in therapy, in our media. Unfortunately for the answer-seekers, corpses can’t talk. The dead can’t tell their own stories. I am also bemused by the fact that Cummins followed this up with American Dirt: what would have prompted her to write about people desperate to get into an America that also threatens random violence, police malfeasance, and life-ruining tabloid media? (And that’s not an attack on the US, I am genuinely curious as to why this author wrote that next?) Also: as this book ends before the conclusion of the trials and their appeals, I was interested to read those results on Wikipedia. Ultimately: this was very well written, unbelievably heart-wrenching and thoughtfully composed, and I am grateful for the victim-forward balance this brings to the true crime genre. ...more |
Notes are private!
|
1
|
Apr 10, 2024
|
Apr 10, 2024
|
Apr 13, 2024
|
Paperback
| |||||||||||||||
0226832988
| 9780226832982
| 0226832988
| 4.00
| 2
| unknown
| May 01, 2024
|
really liked it
| We’ve got excellent reasons to engage in the wisecracking life, but we may also have serious moral qualms about doing so. My title points to a kind We’ve got excellent reasons to engage in the wisecracking life, but we may also have serious moral qualms about doing so. My title points to a kind of pun: Wisecracks may both bridge cracks and crack bridges, bond people and divide them. Which one occurs depends crucially on what role, if any, empathy plays in the exchange. David Shoemaker is a much-published philosopher and a Professor at the Sage School of Philosophy at Cornell University, and in our modern reality of social media piling-on and cancel culture, he was interested in investigating what role humour (specifically wisecracks) plays in human interaction and whether there is something objectively valuable about this kind of “put down” humour that could speak back to the “prigs” with their efforts to silence others with a blanket “There’s nothing funny about ______” attitude. Wisecracks is the result of that investigation, and as Shoemaker is a fan of wisecracking humour himself, he entertainingly balances scholarship with snark and assembles what I found to be a compelling argument in favour of this type of joking around. This is exactly the sort of thing I like to read about, and it was well done. (Note: I read an ARC through NetGalley and passages quoted may not be in their final forms.) Wisecracks are ways of interacting with other people, but they are distinctive because what makes wisecracks aesthetically good — amusing — is often the very same thing that can make them morally bad. They tweak or ignore some of the norms that sustain our interpersonal lives, such as our expectations of trust and honesty, our desires for respect and equal worth, our concern to be viewed as the particular people we are (rather than as members of some group). These features make them very different, and far more interesting, than jokes. As a philosopher, Shoemaker begins by defining terms: the difference between jokes and wisecracks, the surprisingly long list of elements (his “kitchen sink theory”) that can make a statement humorous, and the admittedly tautologically cute definition of amusing as that which a “properly developed, refined, and unobstructed human sense of humor would respond to with amusement” (each element of which is further explored). I found it interesting that Shoemaker found no philosophical scholarship on wisecracking in particular (although there has been research on written “jokes”, which Shoemaker contrarily argues have zero moral element; a position which piqued me), but as someone whose own family regularly roasts one another at the dinner table, I can certainly agree that this kind of humour — and especially wisecracks based on inside information and long memories — serves to raise the mood and reinforce bonds (as they say on Comedy Central: we only roast the ones we love). Along the way, Shoemaker addresses taboo topics (racism, sexism, disabilities, sexual assault), those without “properly developed” senses of humour (such as folks with autism or psychopaths), those with “obstructed” senses of humour (buffoons — they who mistakenly, and annoyingly, see humour in everything — and prigs, who refuse to look for humour behind a wisecrack based on misguided principles). And I found all of this to be fascinating and compelling. What crucially matters in responding correctly to both the funniness and the moral status of a wisecrack are the wisecrackers intentions and motives, which amount to what the wisecracker means by it and what his or her attitudes are toward others affected or targeted by the wisecrack. Ultimately, intentions are everything; the love behind the roast. There’s a passage in which Shoemaker compares a picture of Demi Lovato getting “slimed” at the Nickelodeon Kids’ Choice Awards and Stephen King’s Carrie having the bucket of pigs’ blood dumped on her head at Prom: a pan to the audience in each situation shows people laughing hysterically, but if you had to explain the difference in the two similar-looking scenes to a visitor from another planet (my own analogy), you’d harken to the pranksters’ intentions and desired effects and easily be able to explain that one was meant in fun and the other in cruelty. And when it comes to wisecracks, whether at the dinner table or on social media, the “morality” of any quip ought to be judged in these terms as well. Very interesting and timely stuff, well argued. ...more |
Notes are private!
|
1
|
Apr 06, 2024
|
Apr 07, 2024
|
Apr 06, 2024
|
Paperback
| |||||||||||||||
0593475283
| 9780593475287
| 0593475283
| 3.97
| 38
| unknown
| Aug 20, 2024
|
liked it
| Obituaries of the scathing variety are really what inspired our ventures into the world of the macabre. I mean hello . . . it’s why we put the bitc Obituaries of the scathing variety are really what inspired our ventures into the world of the macabre. I mean hello . . . it’s why we put the bitch in OBITCHUARY! Yes they’re hilarious, in an absurd morbid way, but really it’s the shock factor. Who would have thought that such a thing existed, and what would prompt somebody to write one? Well, as it turns out, there’s a variety of reasons. The truth of the matter is, some people just plain suck. We can all probably name at least one person in our lives worthy of some petty last words. Spencer Henry and Madison Reyes have hosted a weekly podcast since 2021 called OBITCHUARY — which started as a venue for sharing “outlandish, hilarious, and sometimes scathing obituaries”, and has grown to include “bizarre history, strange funeral traditions” and a “dumb criminals segment” — and this is a compilation of some of their favourite findings. I expected Obitchuary: The Big Hot Book of Death to be more comprehensive (along the lines of Mary Roach’s Stiff), but while this is not a very serious look at the science or history surrounding death and its rituals, there was much here I hadn’t known before, all told in small, punchy bites. I feel this was written for a younger reader than I — the humour didn’t really land with me — but I do appreciate the effort to demystify that big unknown that’s coming for us all. (Note: I read an ARC through NetGalley and passages quoted may not be in their final forms.) Examples of the facts and the writing style: • Philip Clover of Columbus, Ohio, developed a device he called the “coffin torpedo” in 1878. In his words, it was a device created to “prevent the unauthorized resurrection of dead bodies.” It involved a system of triggers and springs that detonates an explosion of lead balls if the casket lid is opened after burial. Judge Thomas N. Howell invented his revision of the coffin-torpedo with the catchy slogan, “Sleep well, sweet angel, let no fears of ghouls disturb thy rest, for above thy shrouded form lies a torpedo, ready to make mincemeat of anyone who attempts to convey you to the pickling vat.” Hot damn. Imagine you’re just trying to get some cash for gold to get a bump on a Saturday night and — WHAMMY— your meat is minced, babe. Ultimately: There were fewer “scathing” obituaries than I expected, fewer new and interesting facts (but to be fair, more than none), and nothing really made me laugh, but I did appreciate the aim of demystifying death: there was a section on the “alarming” suicide rates in South Korea and efforts being made (by places such as the Hyowon Healing Center) to offer “living funerals” — in which people can don shrouds and enter a dim room with a coffin in order to meditate on the reality and finality of death — and this actually seems to help these people better embrace life, so a story like that confirms the importance of conversations like those found in this book: We hope you enjoyed our little romp through death. Our aim was to make you laugh and teach you something new while maybe changing how you see death. It’s a scary topic, one that is hard to comprehend, but learning about it gives us power. We wanted to show that it’s okay to talk about it and that knowledge can help us understand it better. ...more |
Notes are private!
|
1
|
Mar 27, 2024
|
Mar 28, 2024
|
Mar 27, 2024
|
Hardcover
| |||||||||||||||
0393881024
| 9780393881028
| 0393881024
| 3.82
| 473
| May 07, 2024
| May 07, 2024
|
it was amazing
| The expression “tits up” is American showbiz slang for an upbeat attitude, often used as a positive send-off from one woman to another. “Tits up” r The expression “tits up” is American showbiz slang for an upbeat attitude, often used as a positive send-off from one woman to another. “Tits up” reminds a woman to stand up, pull her shoulders back, and flourish. It’s a cheer that reassures a sister that she will succeed. Sarah Thornton is a sociologist and ethnographer, and when breast cancer forced her to have a double mastectomy — and she didn’t think twice about having breast implants as part of her reconstructive surgery — she received blowback from her feminist friends that she was caving to the pressures of the patriarchy. Being a lesbian and a public feminist herself, Thornton was in a unique position to self-interrogate on just why she wanted the implants, and as an author who has made a career of writing on art and culture, she went out into the field to investigate those whose work centres on women’s breasts: sex workers, milk bank donors, plastic surgeons, bra designers, and in a bit of a stretch thematically (but intriguing to read about), pagan/witchy women who bare their breasts ritually. In Tits Up, Thornton approaches each experience with curiosity and impartiality, and from lapdancers to lactation consultants, she treats everyone she encounters with dignity and genuine interest. From the fascinating facts to the engaging writing style, I loved everything about this; four and a half stars, perkily rounded up. (Note: I read an ARC through NetGalley and passages quoted may not be in their final forms.) Tits Up explores beauty, health, respect, self-esteem, self-determination, humanness, and equality. I hope to shed light on breasts in ways that elevate their value, not just because I believe in some happy, shiny body positivity, but because these organs are emblematic of womanhood. Put another way, I have no doubt that the status of breasts — not to mention tits, titties, jugs, racks, and apexes — is integral to women’s social position. For as long as breasts are disparaged as silly boobs, we will remain the “second sex.” I’ll start by stating that my sense of the title is closer to the British usage: “In Britain, ‘tits up’ means something has gone ‘belly up,’ like a lifeless fish floating in water”, but I do appreciate Thornton’s more positive usage (and she does suggest that the American showbiz slang might be an ironic flip of the original, like “break a leg”). Thornton starts her investigation in a strip club, and along the way interviews a variety of sex workers (which she calls an “umbrella term” that includes strippers, sensual masseuses, porn [film/online/phone] actors, sexual surrogates, professional sugar babies, dominatrices, karaoke hostesses [domis]; even Hooters waitresses, cheerleaders, and perhaps, wives], and concludes: Strippers, as professional manipulators of male desire, are acutely aware of the dynamics of patriarchy. Sitting here, I’ve come to respect their position on the frontline, observing their shrewd navigation of the global gender war. In the past, I might have assumed that they pandered to patriarchy, but I’ve come to see this perspective as prudish and thoughtlessly classist. Thornton’s ultimate conclusion on this type of work — as a feminist and as a cultural commentator — is that the state needs to stop policing sex work, “If some women can’t sell their bodies, then none of us actually own our bodies.” Thornton turns her attention to milk banks — interviewing those who donate surplus breast milk, those who buy it, and those who run the milk banks — and she discovers a lot about differing global attitudes to breastfeeding (Norway is the world leader, France is culturally opposed [one French woman even had her doctor advise her to stop breastfeeding after eight months because, “Your breasts belong to your husband”], and the USA is somewhere in the middle, with African-Americans least likely to breastfeed [likely a holdover from when enslaved women were forced to wetnurse]), all of which I found fascinating: Most of the “breast is best” conversation has focused on the benefits of breastfeeding for infants, as if the health of mothers were irrelevant — a phenomenon that a militant might dub medical misogyny but which I prefer to call patriarchal obliviousness. A final note on the American situation: the WIC (food stamps program) is the world’s largest purchaser of powdered infant formula, and Thornton writes that the WIC program is weirdly administered by the USDA instead of Health and Human Services, quoting the director of Mothers’ Milk Bank in Austin, Texas as explaining,“(It’s) because WIC is a US dairy farmers’ subsidization program. Do you think it’s their mission to improve community public health by having more breastfed children? No, they say a whole lot of things, but their mission is to make sure that the bovine industry is alive and well in the USA.” Interesting. Moving on to plastic surgery, Thornton observes as a woman has her implants removed and her remaining breast tissue repaired, and has a fascinating interview with her surgeon. We learn that more trans men than trans women have “top surgery” (likely because the first is covered by insurance while the second isn’t), most women who have a mastectomy opt for implants (again: covered by insurance, so most don’t think too hard about the alternative), and as the majority of plastic surgeons are men, they tend to recommend large implants with 1960’s-era Playboy cartoon upturned nipples (the woman surgeon that Thornton is watching even describes conferences at which the male surgeons still joke about asking men if they want to go up a cup size while their wives are already under sedation. Har har.) But although Thornton appreciates the misogynistic overtones of breast implants, she concludes: While most feminists have seen beauty as a form of submission, others have argued that it is a means of resistance. I think the binary logic of this “structure versus agency” debate is a dead end because the problem is not an either-or. The pursuit of beauty can be both a form of obedience and an effort to subvert and surmount. I read a compelling article by critic Rita Felski, arguing that feminists need to craft thicker descriptions of aesthetic experience so we can balance the political costs of being beautiful with the emotional benefits. Only then can we do justice to the reasons why humans pursue and take solace in beauty. I didn’t take much away from the section on bra designers (other than the evolving history of women’s “intimates” that still keep us covered, and controlled, more than men), and while the final section at the Fool’s Journey pagan restorative retreat did make for interesting reading, it’s tangential to the topic at best: Through being here and researching the place of breasts in spirituality, I have come to understand that there is no necessary opposition between feminism and religion. Women’s emancipation is not exclusively secular. In fact, our liberation may be enhanced by flights of fancy and leaps of faith. Naturally, there’s a lot more information in Tit’s Up than can be included here, but I want to reiterate that this is a very pleasing and pleasant read. It makes a good companion piece to a book I read last year — Butts: A Backstory, on the history of male attraction to the female behind — and as with that book, I think it’s important to stop every now and then and interrogate the culture we’re living in: we may find ourselves in a time of hyperfixation on and sexualization of breasts, but that has not been the case across global cultures and throughout human history. So when a socially acute woman like Thornton makes the decision to include breast implants as a part of her post-mastectomy reconstruction — despite being very aware of the counteracting pressures put upon her by the patriarchy and her sisterhood of feminist friends — we ought to acknowledge, even celebrate, what that decision meant to her own sense of self and mental well-being: When I observe women who relish their cleavage, I am delighted by their good fortune. Breasts and chests are the literal front and center of body positivity....more |
Notes are private!
|
1
|
Mar 12, 2024
|
Mar 16, 2024
|
Mar 12, 2024
|
Hardcover
| |||||||||||||||
1984863525
| 9781984863522
| 1984863525
| 4.03
| 150
| unknown
| Mar 26, 2024
|
liked it
| “Hope is the pillar that holds up the world,” Pliny the Elder is supposed to have observed. “Hope is the dream of a waking man.” Go looking for hop “Hope is the pillar that holds up the world,” Pliny the Elder is supposed to have observed. “Hope is the dream of a waking man.” Go looking for hopeful climate stories and they turn up everywhere. H is for Hope is like a picture book for adults, with twenty-six essays written by noted science writer Elizabeth Kolbert— accompanied by charming illustrations by Wesley Allsbrook — one for each letter of the alphabet (which sounds like the topics could be cutesy or strained, but they’re really not), and the core message really is about hope. Kolbert makes the case that action is needed on climate change (several of these essays are blunt about the challenges we’re facing), but she also writes about all of the wonderful projects (electrification, “green” concrete, opportunities for large developing economies like India’s to “leapfrog” over fossil fuel use straight to more sustainable energy sources) that are currently taking place, and hopefulness is the point (under N for Narratives, Kolbert stresses that we need to be careful how we discuss climate change: “A diet of bad news leads to paralysis, which yields yet more bad news”, yet, “People who believe in a brighter future are more likely to put in the effort required to achieve it.”) As I read a digital ARC, I’d be very interested to see what a physical copy of this book would look like — it will be shelved in Science and Nature alongside Kolbert’s other books, but will this be more like a graphic novel? A coffee table book? — and as much as I did enjoy reading this, I’m left bemused as to who might buy a copy. (Usual warning that, as I read an ARC, passages quoted may not be in their final forms.) Kolbert begins at A for Svante Arrhenius (who first proposed the link between carbon dioxide and climate change in 1894; he imagined that living under “a warmer sky” would be delightful, but probably 3000 years in the future): It’s easy now to poke fun at Arrhenius for his sunniness. The doubling threshold could be reached within decades, and the results of this are apt to be disastrous. But who among us is really any different? Here we all are, watching things fall apart. And yet, deep down, we don’t believe it. And ends the essay collection at Z for Zero (with a discussion of the Hoover Dam, ground “zero” for climate change in the US, the construction of which was authorised in 1928, just a year after Svante Arrhenius’ death) and I didn’t previously know that the Colorado River has been experiencing a “megadrought” since 1998: From the observation deck, the drought’s effects were scarily apparent. An abandoned dock lay, in pieces, high above the lake’s edge. Instead of being submerged, the power plant’s four intake towers stuck up in the air, like lighthouses. The steep walls of the reservoir, which in pre-dam days formed Black Canyon, were lined in an enormous black stripe — a geological oddity known as the bathtub ring. The ring, composed of minerals deposited by the retreating waters, runs as straight as a ruler, mile after mile. At the start of the drought, the stripe was as high as a giraffe. By 2015, it had grown as tall as the Statue of Liberty. In 2022, it reached the height of the Tower of Pisa. The water level was so low that the dam's generators could operate only sporadically. And along the way, there are many hopeful bits, as here with J for Jobs: Recently, a Princeton-based team issued a report detailing how the United States could reduce its net emissions to zero by 2050. The researchers considered several possible decarbonization “pathways”. The one labelled “high electrification” would, they projected, eliminate sixty-two thousand jobs in the coal industry and four hundred thousand in the natural-gas sector. But it was expected to produce nearly eight hundred thousand jobs in construction, more than seven hundred thousand in the solar industry, and more than a million in upgrading the grid. I like the idea of spreading a hopeful message — it can only help to combat paralysing fatalism — so maybe the point is to have books like this, with bite-sized info, laying around for people to flip through and get inspired. It can’t hurt. ...more |
Notes are private!
|
1
|
Mar 09, 2024
|
Mar 10, 2024
|
Mar 09, 2024
|
Hardcover
| |||||||||||||||
006339295X
| 9780063392953
| 006339295X
| 3.98
| 413
| Mar 28, 2024
| Apr 30, 2024
|
really liked it
| Alone, we had become the lies he had told us. Together, we were learning to unravel it. We were building the chain. We were learning to replace him Alone, we had become the lies he had told us. Together, we were learning to unravel it. We were building the chain. We were learning to replace him with ourselves. In January of 2017, after leaving the clinic room in which she had taken the first dose of the abortifacient that her boyfriend had talked her into, Chimene Suleyman discovered that this boyfriend — the love of her life — was never who she thought he was, and now he was gone; leaving nothing behind but a text telling her that she was now ruined and unworthy of love. Suleyman would eventually learn that this man (never named) similarly ruined the lives of dozens of other women — defrauding some of them of tens of thousands of dollars — and by growing a mutually supportive community with these other victims, Suleyman was able to eventually find a place of healing from which to examine the persistent systems of misogyny that allow men like this to escape consequences. The Chain tells Suleyman’s story (as well as some details from other women’s relationships with this man), examines how society celebrates the playboy (while denigrating the women who get played), and concludes that women (and especially in the wake of the #MeToo movement) can find the power to fight back against this type of toxic masculinity when they band together, share their stories, and support one another. The details of Suleyman’s story are shocking and compelling, but it’s the thoughtful social commentary that makes this an elevated read. (Note: I read an ARC and passages quoted may not be in their final forms.) I reached for my keys, but put them away. I turned the handle on my apartment door and expected, rightly, that it would open. The shirts he left in my closet were no longer there. His T-shirts that had filled the bottom drawer, gone. His sneakers that had formed a neat line against my shoes, and some of my belongings too, gone with him. No one should love me. And I believed him. Because I had been taught to. There’s a lot going on in this memoir: Suleyman is of Turkish Muslim heritage (not white but “white-passing”; what this boyfriend called “sandy”) and had emigrated to America from the Britain she was raised in. Suffering from Depression, a recent breakup, and other pressures from feeling isolated in NYC, Suleyman was a perfect target for this man who liked to lovebomb new girlfriends and then beg understanding for his own mental health challenges (claiming to have been diagnosed with Agoraphobia and Autism); what started as fun and exciting became this man needing to be taken care of, and if the woman had money, he’d clean her out for supposed stays in mental health care facilities or travel money to get to the big job that would allow him to pay her back. He accidentally-on-purpose got more than one woman pregnant (and talked them into abortions that not all of them wanted), he made a habit of taking pictures of his girlfriends sleeping nude without their consent (sometimes sharing them in a group chat with his buddies), and he routinely disappeared when the fun stopped. As a stand-up comedian, a lot of his material was about how dumb women are (four nights before her abortion, Suleyman thought that her boyfriend was sitting with his mother in Atlanta as she was dying, but he was actually in NYC doing a set about how much he hates Muslims), and it was a revelation for Suleyman to watch YouTube videos of his standup routines, in the aftermath of their breakup, and hear men in the audience guffawing at the most unfunny misogynist lines: Comedy is an invisibility cloak for the men who hate women. It’s not objectification, it’s social commentary! It’s not chauvinism, I’m in character! It’s not a rape joke, it’s intellectual critique! It’s not bullying, it’s risqué! It’s not harassment, it’s banter! It’s not a slur, it’s a play on words! “Good” comedy is meant to push boundaries, meant to shock, meant to provoke. If you don’t like it, maybe you’re too sensitive, too literal, maybe you’re just not smart enough to get it. Suleyman makes the point that while we might be shocked by the extent of the abuses committed by the likes of Harvey Weinstein and Jeffery Epstein, popular entertainers like R. Kelly (in the lyrics of his songs) and Jimmy Savile (in countless interviews) told people exactly who they were and what they got up to, and the world just sang and laughed along (as underage victims of sexual abuse were silenced by this apparent cultural acceptance of their experience). Suleyman discusses quite a few male celebrities, and while I think it’s fair to examine the abuses of Bill Cosby and Louis CK (and maybe to a lesser extent, allegations made against Aziz Ansari), I don’t know if it is fair to lump Robert Downey Jr and Mark Wahlberg in with Chris Brown as similarly forgiven for past crimes (or to list celebrities like Ernest Hemingway, John Lennon, Johnny Cash and Russel Brand as all using the depression they suffered as an excuse for the women in their lives to clean up the chaos they created). It all makes the larger point, however, that when we excuse celebrities of their bad behaviour, we are setting a standard for how the unfamous are treated: many of the boyfriend’s buddies were disgusted when they found out that he had taken these women for so much money, but Suleyman demands to know why they weren’t similarly disgusted by how he used their bodies. The antidote, according to Suleyman, is for women to get loud, tell their stories, and join together; if men, and the society they continue to dominate, don't care about the mistreatment of women, women need to focus on caring for each other: There is no singular experience of womanhood and we create the chain to remind ourselves of this. We stand beside each other in such a way that we may say, Tell me your story as a woman, and yours, and yours, and yours. I do not know what it is to be a Jewish woman, a Black woman, or trans, or gay, or disabled, or a sex worker, or a prisoner, or a pilot, or a seamstress, or four husbands deep (yet). Where I fall in our flawed verses of womanhood is that I am unlucky in some ways and fortunate in others. What we share is history. What we share is the need to talk, to say we made it or we didn’t. Survival isn’t enough and it musn’t be. Overall, a compelling read. If I had a complaint: I don’t mind that Suleyman chose not to name the boyfriend, but I didn’t like that every “he, him, or his” she used to refer to him was italicised (I was mentally emphasising the word every time, and it became distracting), and similarly, she italicised “the chain” every time as well, and that felt cutesy and disempowering. Small complaints, good read. ...more |
Notes are private!
|
1
|
Mar 07, 2024
|
Mar 08, 2024
|
Mar 07, 2024
|
Hardcover
| |||||||||||||||
0062968785
| 9780062968784
| 0062968785
| 4.01
| 342,964
| Feb 01, 2018
| Feb 25, 2020
|
liked it
| Nearly everything I know about love, I’ve learned in my long-term friendships with women. Particularly the ones I’ve lived with at one point or ano Nearly everything I know about love, I’ve learned in my long-term friendships with women. Particularly the ones I’ve lived with at one point or another. I know what it is to know every tiny detail about a person and revel in that knowledge as if it were an academic subject. At the time that Dolly Alderton wrote Everything I Know About Love (2018), she had just wrapped up a four year stint as a “dating columnist” for The Sunday Times, so I suppose I can understand how she was given a chance to publish a memoir, at thirty, that primarily focuses on her dating life up to that point. The downside to the concept is that by the time she turned thirty, Alderton hadn’t had what she would actually consider a long-term, serious relationship — so any wisdom she has to share on the topic is a bit thin — but the upside is that the misadventures of her love life (and her life in general) make for an interesting story, and her wry and candid voice is consistently engaging. I don’t know if this book needs to exist, but it captures something true about the Millennial experience (at least that of a boarding-school-raised white British woman who had a dream job fall into her lap and, despite claiming poverty as she shared a damp and crumbling flat with her girlfriends, suffered no serious consequences of her blackout drinking binges or risky hookups) and I don’t regret spending this time in Alderton’s company. This would be a 3.5 star read, rounded down. Some of the memories I have are joyful, some of them are sad, and that was the reality. Sometimes I danced with a grin on my face until dawn in a circle of my closest friends, sometimes I fell over in the street running for the night bus in the rain and lay on the wet pavement for far longer than I should have. Sometimes I knocked myself out walking into a lamppost, left with a purple chin for days. But sometimes I woke up in a loving tangle of hungover girls, filled with nothing but comfort and joy. From the first time getting drunk at a bat mitzvah at twelve, Alderton long sought out opportunities to drink heavily, and this book is stuffed with stories of her (often risk-filled) attempts to keep the parties going long after she had drunk her friends under the table. Being the loud drunk girl can-canning on the dance floor at the pub, scanning the room for a guy to hook up with, seems to be Alderton’s primary activity through her twenties; and as her friends entered serious relationships one by one, and as her own romances crashed and burned, Alderton found her sense of self cracking up. Therapy helped and becoming a more present friend to her roommates helped and realising that “everything she knew about love” was tied to her longtime friendships with these women — that helped, too. By thirty, having tried every dating app and trick for the sake of her newspaper column, Alderton came to the conclusion that maybe she didn’t even need a man in her life: I am enough. My heart is enough. The stories and the sentences twisting around my mind are enough. I am fizzing and frothing and buzzing and exploding. I’m bubbling over and burning up. My early-morning walks and my late-night baths are enough. My loud laugh at the pub is enough. My piercing whistle, my singing in the shower, my double-jointed toes are enough. I am a just-pulled pint with a good, frothy head on it. I am my own universe; a galaxy; a solar system. I am the warm-up act, the main event, and the backing singers. And if this is it, if this is all there is — just me and the trees and the sky and the seas — I know now that that’s enough. The stories are engaging — many are funny, some heart-wrenching — and Alderton does a good job of forming them into a meaningful narrative, but there’s some filler here, too: unnecessary recipes and satirical invented emails from bridezillas and a mom-to-be-zilla (is that a thing?) that I didn’t really find amusing. As her life story rolls out chronologically, Alderton lists everything she knows about love at twenty-one, and then twenty-five, and then thirty — and while this affords her an opportunity to give her evolving opinion on important matters such as waxing body hair and faking orgasms, I was still left thinking, “She’s thirty: this may be the accumulated wisdom of her years, but it’s not that many years, really.” Overall: I did like Alderton’s voice and writing style and the obvious love she shows for her girlfriends; this was entertaining for the most part, ultimately comes to a point about found family in these times of disconnection, and was an easy page turner; I was never bored. That makes it a worthwhile read to me (but maybe doesn’t need to exist). ...more |
Notes are private!
|
1
|
Feb 25, 2024
|
Mar 2024
|
Feb 25, 2024
|
Hardcover
| |||||||||||||||
1399409778
| 9781399409773
| 1399409778
| 3.87
| 23
| unknown
| Apr 30, 2024
|
really liked it
| As we finished making fieldwork plans, I thought of something else to ask. “Umbu, have you heard of the mili mongga?” I saw sensible Ibu Jen smile As we finished making fieldwork plans, I thought of something else to ask. “Umbu, have you heard of the mili mongga?” I saw sensible Ibu Jen smile and roll her eyes. But Umbu didn’t laugh. “Yes, Pak Sam!” he frowned in thought. “I have heard people talk about it.” I had to ask more. “Do you know anyone who might be able to tell us about it?” Umbu promised that he’d ask around and see what he could find out. I was definitely not prepared for where that question would take us. Samuel Turvey, Senior Research Fellow and Professor of Conservation Biology at the Zoological Society of London, was on a fossil expedition on the Indonesian island of Sumba when repeated reports of a legendary “wildman of the jungle”, the mili mongga, demanded his attention. It seems that everywhere his research group travelled, they encountered people who had stories about their village’s past encounters with these hairy giants, and repeatedly, his group would follow these leads into the unknown. The Tomb of the Mili Mongga is the account of several of Turvey’s expeditions to Sumba: part travelogue, part lab report, part social commentary, this book is as much about what a people’s mythology says about them as it is the story of what Turvey actually discovered, and I found the whole thing to be fascinating. Exactly my jam. (Note: I read an ARC through NetGalley and passages quoted may not be in their final forms.) This book is about my explorations of an island on the other side of the world, to try to understand what kinds of unique species used to inhabit its remote landscapes, and what happened to these now-vanished animals. But it isn’t just a story about biology or biologists, even though I thought it would be when I started out on my adventure. There’s plenty of science and natural history in the pages that follow, which can hopefully also serve to illustrate the steps through which knowledge accumulates and science progresses; how sources of inspiration might be unexpected, requiring new leads to be followed in unplanned directions when confronted with things that we can’t easily rationalise. The isolation of island ecosystems can lead to the evolution of unique species: Indonesia has not only been home to pygmy elephants and giant rats, but the so-called “hobbit” fossils (Homo floresiensis) found on nearby Flores suggest that it’s not impossible that the little explored (by Westerners) island of Sumba was once home to a vanished hominid like the legendary mili mongga. And everywhere that Turvey inquired about them, locals had stories about how previous generations dealt with the dumb giants (often putting them to work digging gardens or building walls) and could vaguely gesture to where they had been buried outside their villages (with the warning that their remains were not to be dug up). I really enjoyed Turvey’s adventure writing (from his repeated encounters with chewing betel nut with his hosts — unable to master spitting the juices, the red liquid would dribble helplessly down his chin, staining clothes and notepads — to exploring a cave where locals reported once finding a cache of bones, and discovering it was filled with human excrement and medical waste); his experience was consistently interesting and the storytelling is engaging. As a scientist, Turvey also relates everything back to his research, and this was not always 100% engaging for me — but I did enjoy learning about ideas such as “euhemerism” (that mythology — even the warring gods in Ancient Greece — is often history in disguise), the “Romeo Error” (species thought extinct sometimes turn up alive), and Lord Raglan’s theory (from 1939) that nonliterate societies turn memory into myth after about 150 years (interesting because the inhabitants of Sumba all talk as though the last encounter with a living mili mongga had been about that long [about five generations] in the past). There was much that I found fascinating here. We may see the universe as fundamentally rational and following immutable natural laws, but to others it remains an enchanted place. As Christopher Hadley wrote in his fascinating investigation of the mythical English dragon-slayer Piers Shonks, “Searching for a kernel of truth by trying to remove the legendary elements misses something, it gets rid of the best bits.” Even amongst researchers, there is increasing recognition that “anthropology should always be open to the possibility of wonder.” It is imperative to consider the mystery of the mili mongga not just from our perspective as outside observers (the so-called etic perspective in anthropology), but also from the perspective of the culture that holds this differing worldview (the emic perspective). This can be extremely difficult — we are all brought up within our own specific cultures, with their own explicit and implicit conventions, assumptions and prejudices about structuring experience and making sense of the world. But if we can gain a different perspective, we might receive some truly surprising insights into how other cultures think about reality. I particularly engage with these ideas of being “open to the possibility of wonder” and making a real effort to understand each culture’s unique worldview: as Turvey’s ultimate realm of concern is the conservation of threatened species, he ably makes the case that the best way forward just might take a detour through the folklore from the past. Fascinating read. ...more |
Notes are private!
|
1
|
Feb 11, 2024
|
Feb 16, 2024
|
Feb 11, 2024
|
Hardcover
| |||||||||||||||
1668050838
| 9781668050835
| 1668050838
| 3.95
| 2,663
| 2024
| May 21, 2024
|
it was amazing
| Everything alive has some kind of flux and ebb, and when that stops, life stops. When people say life is precious, they are saying that the rhythmi Everything alive has some kind of flux and ebb, and when that stops, life stops. When people say life is precious, they are saying that the rhythmic force that runs through all things — your wrist, your children’s wrists, God’s entire green earth — is precious. For my whole life, my pulse ran through me with such quiet power that I never had to think about it. And now they were having trouble finding it. In 2020, at fifty-eight years old, best-selling author Sebastian Junger had a near-fatal health emergency (a ruptured aneurysm on a pancreatic artery; his odds of surviving, even with timely medical intervention, were around 10%), and while doctors at the Cape Cod Hospital in Hyannis worked frantically to save his life, Junger had a profound near death experience that forced him to consider the possibility of an afterlife for the first time. In My Time of Dying is a perfectly balanced account of Junger’s experience: part memoir (including previous brushes with death, as a surfer and as an embedded war journalist in Afghanistan), part investigation into the nature of reality (from others’ accounts of NDEs to the latest revelations from quantum physics), and part personalised processing of his experience and consequent research, this is rich storytelling that nicely blends awe and reason. I must admit that this is exactly my kind of thing (it’s the 28th title on my “death and dying” shelf) but I think it is an objectively excellent read; highly recommended. (Note: I read an ARC through NetGalley and passages quoted may not be in their final forms.) Wilson was still working on my neck, and I was feeling myself getting pulled more and more sternly into the darkness. And just when it seemed unavoidable, I became aware of something else: My father. He’d been dead eight years, but there he was, not so much floating as simply existing above me and slightly to my left. Everything that had to do with life was on the right side of my body and everything that had to do with this scary new place was on my left. My father exuded reassurance and seemed to be inviting me to go with him. “It’s okay, there’s nothing to be scared of,” he seemed to be saying. “Don’t fight it. I’ll take care of you.” I enjoyed all of the biographical information (Junger was writing The Perfect Storm when he had his surfing accident; his great aunt Ithi had an affair with her algebra tutor, Erwin Schrödinger; Junger’s wife insisted he go to the hospital for his stomach pain, reminding the author of “the renowned statistic that married men live longer than unmarried men”), and we learn enough about Junger’s family and upbringing to understand that an encounter with the afterlife would be a shock in this group of atheists and scientists. Junger goes on to share all sides of the debate: stories from those who encountered the afterlife during near death experiences; perfectly rational explanations from scientists regarding brain activity at the time of death; and stories from others, like Junger himself, who understand and believe in the science but who nonetheless had profound NDEs that seemed to promise a continuation of the consciousness after death. And when Junger gets to the latest in quantum physics — explaining how unlikely the existence of the universe, and our place within it as sentient beings, really is — it’s easy to be persuaded to believe in something more. Some interesting bits: • “It doesn’t surprise me that you saw the dead. Not because I have strong beliefs about it, but because I have zero disbelief.” Really well written and interesting throughout, full stars from me. ...more |
Notes are private!
|
1
|
Feb 03, 2024
|
Feb 03, 2024
|
Feb 02, 2024
|
Hardcover
| |||||||||||||||
1662517920
| 9781662517921
| B0CHK4W8CM
| 4.07
| 17,470
| unknown
| Jan 01, 2024
|
really liked it
| I met her in a bar, my mother -in-law, though she wasn’t my mother-in-law yet. I was twenty-seven and waiting tables in the lounge section of a fan I met her in a bar, my mother -in-law, though she wasn’t my mother-in-law yet. I was twenty-seven and waiting tables in the lounge section of a fancy French restaurant, where she happened to be going for a drink with her girlfriends before they went to a Neil Diamond show. My boyfriend, Brian, had told me to expect her, so I spent the first hour of my shift feeling terribly expectant, my heart lurching with anxiety and anticipation every time another customer walked in. Two Women Walk into a Bar is a short account of Cheryl Strayed’s challenging relationship with her mother-in-law; brought into focus when Cheryl and her husband, Brian, were informed that his mom had only weeks to live and would need to move into the assisted-living section of her seniors’ complex. Because I had read Strayed before (and particularly Wild), I didn’t need more information than what is in here in order to understand how Strayed’s family background might affect her relationship with the prickly Joan; this felt like a continuing conversation with an old acquaintance. As this is the story of Joan’s end-of-life experience — and the feelings that it stirred up in her daughter-in-law — there is a universality to this narrative that doesn’t require one to have read Strayed before, but taken all together, I found this very affecting. A worthwhile, if short, read. (Note: I read an ARC through NetGalley and passages quoted may not be in their final forms.) Over the previous two decades, we’d come to love each other, but it was a particular, conditional sort of love, one based on circumstance and courtesy rather than connection and compatibility. Brian was the fulcrum on which our relationship rested, uncomfortable and unsteady as a playground seesaw. We both loved him, and so we were determined to love each other, a resolve that deepened when Brian and I had children — a girl and a boy who were ten and twelve by the time Joan was dying. Between Joan informing her daughter-in-law that there is no greater love than that between a mother and son (perhaps especially so with an only child), and Strayed not being able to take up her mother-in-law’s invitation to start calling her “Mom” (so soon after Strayed had tragically lost her own mother), there were plenty of factors that created distance between the pair. Strayed recalls several instances in which Joan had hurt her feelings over the years, admits that Joan would probably have been happier with “a different sort” of daughter-in-law, but in the end, as Strayed sat at her dying mother-in-law’s bedside, they arrived at a sort of understanding: It had been more than twenty years since she’d walked into that bar and I’d picked her last. She’d been alive in my life for nearly as long as my mother had. She was my family, my ancestor, no matter our distance or difficulties or disappointments, the truth of that finally crackling between us. It’s a (too common) shame when it takes this kind of circumstance for a frosty relationship to melt, and books like this serve as a good reminder that time is running down for us all. As ever, Strayed writes in a relatable and engaging voice and I am pleased to have read this account. ...more |
Notes are private!
|
1
|
Jan 2024
|
Jan 02, 2024
|
Jan 01, 2024
|
Kindle Edition
| |||||||||||||||
0889779813
| 9780889779815
| 0889779813
| 3.55
| 11
| unknown
| Jan 27, 2024
|
really liked it
| Challenge to Civilization: Indigenous Wisdom and the Future is the third book in my series on Indigenous spirituality. The Knowledge Seeker addressed Challenge to Civilization: Indigenous Wisdom and the Future is the third book in my series on Indigenous spirituality. The Knowledge Seeker addressed the nature and viability of Indigenous beliefs, and Loss of Indigenous Eden examined how Indigenous sacred knowledge became oppressed, suppressed, and discounted. This book will demonstrate that Indigenous spirituality is not only still relevant but will be critical to human survival in terms of restoring balance with both natural and supernatural worlds. Dr A. Blair Stonechild is a Cree-Saulteaux member of the Muscowpetung First Nation, professor of Indigenous Studies at First Nations University of Canada, a residential school survivor, and the author of several books on Indigenous history and spirituality. Stonechild’s Challenge to Civilization perfectly captures humanity’s current precarious position at the brink of self-destruction and makes the dual points that there was nothing inevitable about the rise of Western civilisation — one need only look to the Australian Aborigines’ sixty-thousand years of continual culture to recognise that a life lived in spiritual harmony with the environment is stable and indefinitely sustainable, whereas our six thousand year journey of greed and expansion since the first city at Ur has brought us to the point of collapse — and that it’s not too late to embrace the original, Indigenous practices that were once common to everyone on earth. I found quite a bit of this confronting, but mostly because I’m a product of Western culture and its education system; really thinking about what Stonechild has to say, it’s hard to find fault with his conclusions. Fascinating, mind-expanding read. (Note: I read an ARC through NetGalley and passages quotes may not be in their final forms.) Civilization has waged a relentless and often violent campaign to colonize Indigenous Peoples emotionally, intellectually, and spiritually. Part of this campaign has been to portray Indigenous societies as proto-civilizations that would have eventually trodden the path of human self-centredness, greed, and destructiveness. As an alternative, I create the word “ecolization” — a state in which humans recognize that they are not the central purpose of creation, remain grateful for the opportunity to experience physical life, and continue to obey the Creator’s “original instructions”. Stonechild describes his “ecolizations” as hunter-gatherer societies, in which people lived in harmony with nature, only taking what they needed from the commons, and making decisions through group consultation, meditation, and communication with the spiritual. If I had a complaint about this, it would be that he treats all communities outside of Western civilisation (including pre-colonised India and pre-Opium Wars China) as living this way — from the Aztecs, to the Celts, to anyone the Romans called “Barbarians'' — and I’m not sure that this is strictly true. On the other hand, there’s no denying that if Homo sapiens have been around for 600 000+ years, and it has only been since 1820 that “civilised” folks outnumbered the Indigenous around the world, the survival of our species did seem better guaranteed in pre-civilsed times. More than once, Stonechild takes issue with the Hobbesian “nasty, brutish, and short” denigration of a life lived in harmony with nature. In mainstream education we are taught that archeologists, geneticists, and other scientists are convinced that life originated from some sort of biological soup. It is contended that we, as humans, are simply advanced apes — a sort of evolutionary accident. But such an account never existed among Indigenous Peoples. The theory of evolution has been around for less than 200 years, compared to Indigenous stories, such as humanity’s coming from the stars, that have existed for tens of thousands of years. So why are Indigenous stories not given more credence, or at least equal exposure to scientific accounts? I did find this line of thought confronting — that evolution is a “theory”, no more valid as an explanation for the appearance of human consciousness than the Indigenous belief that we came from the stars (and again, is this a universal Indigenous belief?) — and while on the one hand I can feel defensive of the scientific tradition (in which I was raised and educated), on the other, I have to agree that science seems to be mostly in the service of extracting resources, expanding populations, and providing militaries with ever-deadlier weapons of mass destruction; what if we did all behave as though our purpose on earth was to learn through relationships without harm? (And speaking of science and those who thought of First Nations as “primitive” because they didn’t have Old World technology, Stonechild writes, “Indigenous Peoples, given tens of thousands of years of careful development guided by higher virtues, would have eventually discovered all of today’s sciences and technologies, and even more. However, these would have been acquired in a wisely considered way, and as such, would be safe and beneficial for future generations.” More to think on.) The wetiko (greed-driven) cultures that are now in control of world affairs pretend to solve problems through a combination of rationalism, economic development, and military threat. Unfortunately, they lack spiritual authority and will never possess it until they reconcile with Indigenous Peoples and their ancient wisdom. Only a moral revolution can bring humanity back to its original path. What if we could redirect our intellectual, economic, and technological energies into healing Earth? This would lead us closer to a future that recognizes, celebrates, and honours the higher nature of our species. Stonechild writes that even if we made the decision today to embrace Indigenous wisdom as a way to direct world affairs, it could take thousands of years to regain harmony and stability. He acknowledges that we’re not going to give up all of our comforts, but he’s not wrong that Western society is sick and pushing the planet to environmental ruin. Reading this book, and really taking the time to think about what he’s saying — dismissing the voice of rationality that says, “How? There’s no way. Others will always be greedy even if I’m not...” and embracing the spiritual voice that says, “You were not made to live like this...” — there’s something to Stonechild’s argument that feels satisfying and true. And yet the rational voice keeps popping up because that is what I’m steeped in. I know I’ll keep thinking on this and am enlarged for having read this. ...more |
Notes are private!
|
1
|
Dec 29, 2023
|
Dec 30, 2023
|
Dec 29, 2023
|
Paperback
| |||||||||||||||
0300265921
| 9780300265927
| 0300265921
| 4.47
| 62
| unknown
| Apr 09, 2024
|
it was amazing
| How many times, over the years, would my father remind me — quoting Martin Heidegger — that “Language is the house of being”? It would be decades b How many times, over the years, would my father remind me — quoting Martin Heidegger — that “Language is the house of being”? It would be decades before I’d read those words myself in a book by the German philosopher — who was also a member of the Nazi Party — and feel again that sharp pang of recognition: the difficult knowledge that some of the most enduring ideas had been written by complicated figures, like Thomas Jefferson, who believed in racial hierarchies, inherent superiority and inferiority. More and more I would come to understand that it was not simply ignorance that I’d need to push back against, but also the stores of received knowledge — philosophy, history, science — that I would encounter in the most learned places. Written by Pulitzer Prize winning poet, Professor of Creative Writing, and two time US Poet Laureate Natasha Trethewey, The House of Being is thoughtful, compelling, and quotable on literally every page. As part of Yale University Press’ “Why I Write” series (former entries include those written by Joy Harjo, Karl Ove Knausgaard, and Patti Smith), Trethewey answers the question deeply and provocatively. With a white father and a Black mother (whose marriage wasn’t even legal at the time Trethewey was born) and a grandmother whose house was situated deep in Mississippi at the intersection of two highways — one famous for the Blues and one named for Thomas Jefferson — Trethewey was intimately shaped by the local geography and its competing narratives and prejudices. Combining history, memoir, and a lifetime of meditation on the forces that shaped her, this is a masterwork; thoroughly satisfying and necessary. (Note: I read an ARC through NetGalley and passages quoted may not be in their final forms.) My need to make meaning from the geography of my past is not unlike the ancients looking to the sky at the assortment of stars and drawing connections between them: the constellations they named inscribing a network of stories that gave order and meaning to their lives. That’s one of the reasons I write. I’ve needed to create the narrative of my life — its abiding metaphors — so that my story would not be determined for me. Trethewey’s father — a poet himself — taught her early to describe the world around her metaphorically. In later life, people would assume that she “learned to write” from her father, but Trethewey insists that she learned as much from her grandmother — particularly the rhythms she picked up from her grandmother’s sewing machine — and from her mother, she learned how to use her voice to speak back to power; as when her mother would sing an inspirational version of John Brown’s Body whenever they drove past a Confederate flag (as on their state flag): Singing to me as we passed the state flag of Mississippi was a way to counteract the symbolic, psychic violence of it. Through the triumphant, stirring rhythms of the song, my mother was showing me how to signify, how to use received forms to challenge the dominant cultural narrative of our native geography, and to transcend it by imagining a reality in which justice was possible. Her voice was a counterweight. From her grandmother living at the crossroads of the Blues (according to legend, guitarist Robert Johnson sold his soul to the devil in order to play as well as he did — which obviously discounts his talent, skill, and practise), to the whitewashing of nearby Ship Island (a prison for Confederate soldiers that has a plaque at its entrance, thanks to the United Daughters of the Confederacy, that lists the names of every white soldier held prisoner there but which doesn’t acknowledge anywhere that the guards were all formerly enslaved Black men that had fought for the Union Army), the geography of her childhood had effects that were both intimately particular to Trethewey herself and broadly metaphorical of the American ethos. Wanting to add her voice to those who would confront the dominant narrative perfectly answers why Trethewey writes. The act of writing is a way to create another world in language, a dwelling place for the psyche wherein the chaos of the external world is transformed, shaped into a made thing, and ordered. It is an act of reclamation. And resistance: the soul sings for justice and the song is poetry. This is a short read, but weighty and compelling. I loved the whole thing. ...more |
Notes are private!
|
1
|
Dec 19, 2023
|
Dec 20, 2023
|
Dec 19, 2023
|
Hardcover
| |||||||||||||||
1738681807
| 9781738681808
| B0CGM7XG6X
| 3.50
| 2
| unknown
| Aug 23, 2023
|
really liked it
| The purpose of our life is sometimes known to us, and sometimes it isn’t. We may have changed someone’s time here by setting them on a different pa The purpose of our life is sometimes known to us, and sometimes it isn’t. We may have changed someone’s time here by setting them on a different path. Or we may have made them feel just a little bit better with our smile. We may not know what our purpose is, but knowing it is less important than living it. I don’t know if mine has a name, but I believe I have found it in my moments. I hope my stories help you share yours. Raynia Carr has worked as a medical social worker in hospital settings for the past couple decades and the interactions that she’s had with patients (many elderly, many at the end of their lives) has prompted her to think deeply on her own life; tying key memories to lessons learned, sharing how those learnings often became applicable later. Moments is a collection of essays (each chapter themed on a topic like Hope, Courage, and Gratitude), each including these personal stories, and the whole making for an interesting and relatable memoir. Carr doesn’t share a lot from her work life — this would not truly be categorised as a medical memoir — but she has something to say and a smooth delivery that made for an interesting read. (Note: I’m rounding up to four stars to reflect my admiration for a debut effort. Note also: I read an ARC through NetGalley and passages quoted may not be in their final forms.) What if we were to view death as part of the certain, albeit unknown, lived experience? What if we spent our lives not running with our feet pounding on the pavement but instead we floated through it like a river, secure in knowing that death is our final harbour? I was particularly interested in Carr’s writing on the topic of death and the lessons that she’s taken away from her interaction with patients: Start talking about death and its practicalities, live life as though death was near, and do not fear the unknown. This last was particularly compelling as Carr explains: No one knows what happens once our last breath is taken. We spend our time agonizing, fearing, dreading, and doing everything we can to avoid it, yet it is an absolute fact that it will happen. If we can be aware of our fears around this, we can allow the mystery of life to take its course and have faith in knowing that, in the end, there is an infinite space where we go, returning to the same source from where we came. I was right there with her until she seemed to contradict herself (but I would like to have such faith in knowing where we end up.) One thing I have learned so far from parents, children, friends, and patients is this: the big moments are important, but so much more happens during the spaces in between. I speak of those times that aren’t planned in our calendars: strolling in meadows; falling in love; finding hope in times of adversity; watching the sun as it sets in a clear evening sky; accepting an ending; growing old; conquering a fear; giving birth; smiling at a stranger; failing at something; watching a flock of birds take flight; making mistakes; feeling an animal's care; meeting new people while away; seeing an ocean wave approach and recede and knowing it’s been doing this forever. These moments are the stories that make our lives, and the ones that truly matter in the end. Most of the writing in Moments is about Carr’s core memories (lies told, classroom injustice, first loves) but she does a commendable job of linking the big moments with small ones to demonstrate common themes that played out throughout her life. In a way, this works as a guide — maybe even an impetus — for others to explore their own core memories — the big and small moments — that have made up their own lives. I enjoyed this and feel inspired. ...more |
Notes are private!
|
1
|
Dec 14, 2023
|
Dec 17, 2023
|
Dec 18, 2023
|
Paperback
| |||||||||||||||
1646221788
| 9781646221783
| 1646221788
| 4.20
| 167
| unknown
| Mar 12, 2024
|
really liked it
| What the records tell us is this: human desire is a powerful thing. It is also ephemeral, lost in the moment it is felt, though its traces remain i What the records tell us is this: human desire is a powerful thing. It is also ephemeral, lost in the moment it is felt, though its traces remain in the world long after. From a swelled root to a crinkled leaf: in the plants we eat, there are remnants of our search for the medicinal and the palatable, and in their genetic makeup, a record of our movements between places. As written by the child of immigrants — author Jessica J. Lee has a Taiwanese mother, a Welsh father, and was born and raised in Canada — Dispersals shares a unique view on what it means to be “out of place”; whether considering plants or people, she makes the case that the language we use regarding what is “foreign” is pretty similar. Lee has an impressive educational background (with a Masters in International Development and a PhD in Environmental History and Aesthetics), and has travelled widely — working and living in Germany and England for the past several years — and as she now teaches Creative Writing at the University of Cambridge, she is, from every angle, perfectly experienced to think and write on these themes. Dispersals is a collection of essays that combines Lee’s personal stories with geography, science, and philosophy, and in each one, she displays deep thinking, fascinating facts, and clear writing. I don’t know what I was expecting from this book, but I enjoyed it a lot. (Note: I read an ARC through NetGalley and passages quoted may not be in their final forms.) I am fascinated by the way words can be bound tight to past places, by the way a simple question can unfold an entire scene, long thought forgotten. The way a fruit — even just its mention — can carry more than its weight in flesh. This quote is from a section on mangoes, and this plant is one of several that Lee links to the history of empire-building (with the shorthand history being that Portugal first popularised the mango when they brought it out of their colonies in India). Lee quotes from E. M. Forster’s A Passage to India and Arundhati Roy’s The God of Small Things, demonstrating how over the decades, the literary treatment of this fruit has become “extraordinarily fraught…signifying exoticism performed for a white gaze.” Lee has similar treatments for cherry trees — it’s interesting to learn that the corridor formerly occupied by the Berlin Wall is now planted with thousands of cherry trees gifted from Japan after its fall, but also that Japan has a long history of planting cherry trees in countries they have colonised [ie, Korea and Taiwan] in order to transform both landscapes and mindsets — and the history of tea (the secrets of its cultivation and processing were “stolen” from China by a British man disguised as a local), and as Lee grew up with parents who enjoyed two very different tea rituals, hers is an interesting take on how both plants and their related customs are translated across time and space. In addition to the big and showy, Lee writes about the small: the seaweeds, mosses, and fungi that are (mostly) accidentally transported around the world. And while in some cases these are harmless, she warns that there are always going to be those people wanting to return areas to some impossible-to-determine baseline “natural” state; which in Britain, she subtly links to xenophobia and Brexit; and having lived in Berlin, she makes a more overt link to Aryan notions of purity. Interesting stuff to think about. Simply through repetition — in storybooks and novels deemed classics, curricula — British landscapes come to signify romance, an ideal in nature. I pay no attention to flora outside my window — in a flat land of canola and corn, where forests are built of sugar maple and pines. I read so little of these plants, and in truth, they hold little interest for me. It will take me years before I realise that I’ve built my notions of beauty from the stories of a distant land. As I also grew up in the centre of Canada, I share Lee’s experience that the view outside my window doesn’t necessarily jibe with what I’ve been conditioned to consider idyllic beauty; and that’s an interesting effect of technically living in a colony. There’s a lot here on empires (including Lee’s increasing discomfort travelling on her British passport) and how delineating borders exacerbates the us-vs-them attitude (whether discussing people or plants), and for the most part, it’s a fair discussion of ideas I haven’t thought about in this way before. Worth the read. ...more |
Notes are private!
|
1
|
Nov 30, 2023
|
Dec 03, 2023
|
Nov 30, 2023
|
Hardcover
| |||||||||||||||
1662508026
| 9781662508028
| B0CHK7H3QH
| 3.66
| 879
| unknown
| Dec 26, 2023
|
liked it
| I’m absolutely certain that I’m now the most boring and ordinary that I’ve ever been. I’m very relaxed and surprisingly well mannered. I go to bed I’m absolutely certain that I’m now the most boring and ordinary that I’ve ever been. I’m very relaxed and surprisingly well mannered. I go to bed early, I avoid red meat and gluten, I get excited about trips to Costco. My slide to all this mundanity started in January 2019, when I tried to have a one-night stand with my high school boyfriend and accidentally married him instead. I’ve been aware of Katherine Ryan for several years now (particularly from her appearances on British talk and game shows), and having always enjoyed her storytelling, I thought that How to Accidentally Settle Down would be a short and sweet palate cleanser between more serious fare. And it is that: not quite 50 pages, Ryan briefly summarises her romantic life — from first love, Bobby, to more adult relationships (including a long stretch with a man she calls “Then Boyfriend” [TB]; the father of her first child, Violet), and finally a reconnection with Bobby twenty years later — and while Ryan describes everything with a sardonic, comedic touch, the stories tend to somehow have both too much and not enough detail. Ultimately: I don’t know if this needed to be written, but it was an entertaining enough reading experience; still interested in reading Ryan’s longer work. (Note: I read an ARC through NetGalley and passages quoted may not be in their final forms.) After my daughter, Violet, was born and her arrival didn’t miraculously transform a grown man, I joked that we’d wanted a “save the relationship” baby, but we’d ended up with a regular one instead. No one in my family or friendship group had ever been a massive fan of TB, but I stand by his good qualities now like I did then. He’s not a terrible person, just a bit of a dreamer, and we were wrong for each other. My daughter, I believe, just really wanted to be born. Souls can do that, you know. They — from, I dunno, space or wherever — can match you up with a random person, drag you from Canada to the UK, strike you down with lupus, and keep you in an unsuitable relationship just so that they can exist on Earth. It’s all part of their journey, and I would never resent Violet for what she had to do to get here. If anything, I respect the hustle. After describing her experiences with a few men that didn’t work out (nicknamed the Overlap, the Sketch Actor, the Comedy Producer [I basically have the same criteria as a giant panda for new relationships, in that if you put me in close enough proximity of a potential mate with adequate resources for long enough, we’ll eventually give breeding a go]), Ryan decided to concentrate on her career and single motherhood. I watched a video clip after reading this of Ryan being interviewed around the time the she had reconnected with Bobby and she describes how hard it was to introduce a man into the feminine, girl power space she and her daughter had forged for themselves, and I get that that must have been hard: you embrace this alternative model of, “We don’t need a man in the house to be a family,” and then you go and introduce a man into the house. Ryan doesn’t really go into this in the book (other than describing how ten-year-old Violet objected when the Danish commitment ceremony they participated in looked too much like a wedding), but as Katherine and Bobby have two more kids together now, it looks like a happy ending; and everyone deserves that. The days are long, but the years are short, and it’s on our minds that every minute we spend caring for our family is an investment in the beautiful future we are hopeful for, when all the kids are old enough to be our friends. Having a family with my high school boyfriend, just as my hormonal teenage brain predicted, is the type of basic shit that I’ve come to live for. ...more |
Notes are private!
|
1
|
Nov 29, 2023
|
Nov 29, 2023
|
Nov 29, 2023
|
Kindle Edition
|
|
|
|
|
|
my rating |
|
|
||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
4.48
|
really liked it
|
May 14, 2024
|
May 14, 2024
|
||||||
4.00
|
really liked it
|
Apr 26, 2024
|
Apr 26, 2024
|
||||||
4.56
|
it was amazing
|
Apr 18, 2024
|
Apr 17, 2024
|
||||||
3.92
|
really liked it
|
Apr 13, 2024
|
Apr 13, 2024
|
||||||
3.65
|
really liked it
|
Apr 12, 2024
|
Apr 13, 2024
|
||||||
4.21
|
really liked it
|
Apr 10, 2024
|
Apr 13, 2024
|
||||||
4.00
|
really liked it
|
Apr 07, 2024
|
Apr 06, 2024
|
||||||
3.97
|
liked it
|
Mar 28, 2024
|
Mar 27, 2024
|
||||||
3.82
|
it was amazing
|
Mar 16, 2024
|
Mar 12, 2024
|
||||||
4.03
|
liked it
|
Mar 10, 2024
|
Mar 09, 2024
|
||||||
3.98
|
really liked it
|
Mar 08, 2024
|
Mar 07, 2024
|
||||||
4.01
|
liked it
|
Mar 2024
|
Feb 25, 2024
|
||||||
3.87
|
really liked it
|
Feb 16, 2024
|
Feb 11, 2024
|
||||||
3.95
|
it was amazing
|
Feb 03, 2024
|
Feb 02, 2024
|
||||||
4.07
|
really liked it
|
Jan 02, 2024
|
Jan 01, 2024
|
||||||
3.55
|
really liked it
|
Dec 30, 2023
|
Dec 29, 2023
|
||||||
4.47
|
it was amazing
|
Dec 20, 2023
|
Dec 19, 2023
|
||||||
3.50
|
really liked it
|
Dec 17, 2023
|
Dec 18, 2023
|
||||||
4.20
|
really liked it
|
Dec 03, 2023
|
Nov 30, 2023
|
||||||
3.66
|
liked it
|
Nov 29, 2023
|
Nov 29, 2023
|