Jump to ratings and reviews
Rate this book

Rethinking the South African Crisis: Nationalism, Populism, Hegemony

Rate this book
Since the end of apartheid, South Africa has become an extreme yet unexceptional embodiment of forces at play in many other regions of the world: intensifying inequality alongside “wageless life,” proliferating forms of protest and populist politics that move in different directions, and official efforts at containment ranging from liberal interventions targeting specific populations to increasingly common police brutality.

Rethinking the South African Crisis revisits long-standing debates to shed new light on the transition from apartheid. Drawing on nearly twenty years of ethnographic research, Hart argues that local government has become the key site of contradictions. Local practices, conflicts, and struggles in the arenas of everyday life feed into and are shaped by simultaneous processes of de-nationalization and re-nationalization. Together they are key to understanding the erosion of African National Congress hegemony and the proliferation of populist politics.

This book provides an innovative analysis of the ongoing, unstable, and unresolved crisis in South Africa today. It also suggests how Antonio Gramsci’s concept of passive revolution, adapted and translated for present circumstances with the help of philosopher and liberation activist Frantz Fanon, can do useful analytical and political work in South Africa and beyond.

296 pages, Paperback

First published January 1, 2014

About the author

Gillian Hart

11 books

Ratings & Reviews

What do you think?
Rate this book

Friends & Following

Create a free account to discover what your friends think of this book!

Community Reviews

5 stars
3 (75%)
4 stars
1 (25%)
3 stars
0 (0%)
2 stars
0 (0%)
1 star
0 (0%)
Displaying 1 of 1 review
5 reviews1 follower
August 5, 2014
As my first foray into the deep political issues of my country at the moment, this book was overloaded to me with terms, events, people, and social science concepts. I loved it. It was both a big start to my continued interest in political and social change and my awareness of current governmental habits. It was difficult, I admit, to get through, since I was very unused to the academic dialect at the time, but it posed a challenge through that which was good for me. Intensely well-researched and controversial for the average ignorant citizen (and we are all indeed ignorant by design, let us not pretend), but also severely necessary.
Displaying 1 of 1 review

Can't find what you're looking for?

Get help and learn more about the design.