Skip to content

Breaking News

A surveillance camera which is part of facial recognition technology test is seen at Berlin Suedkreuz station on August 3, 2017 in Berlin, Germany. Oakland's city council, on Tuesday, voted to bar city departments from using such technology.(Photo by Steffi Loos/Getty Images)
A surveillance camera which is part of facial recognition technology test is seen at Berlin Suedkreuz station on August 3, 2017 in Berlin, Germany. Oakland’s city council, on Tuesday, voted to bar city departments from using such technology.(Photo by Steffi Loos/Getty Images)
New reporter Ali Tadayon photographed in studio in Oakland, Calif., on Friday, Sept. 8, 2017. (Dan Honda/Bay Area News Group)
PUBLISHED: | UPDATED:

OAKLAND — Oakland police and other city departments will not use facial recognition technology under a new policy, the third of its kind in the United States.

The Oakland City Council unanimously approved the ban Tuesday.

San Francisco was the first U.S. city to prohibit the facial recognition technology in May, and Somerville, Massachusetts, prohibited the technology in June. A second required vote on Oakland’s ordinance is scheduled for the Sept. 17 City Council meeting, after which the policy would go into effect.

The technology has been widely criticized for infringing on people’s privacy, and a 2008 report by the Massachusetts Institute of Technology found the technology disproportionately misidentifies people of color.

“It is literally racially biased policing software; we don’t need this in our town,” Tracy Rosenberg of the advocacy group Oakland Privacy said at Tuesday’s council meeting.

The ordinance faced opposition from the police department, which sought a limited ban that would only apply to “real-time” facial recognition technology. Real-time facial recognition technology scans surveillance footage to spot and track people, while non-real-time technology is used to run mug shots through state and federal databases.

The police department does not use any real-time facial recognition technology and has no plans to purchase it, according to a report from police Chief Anne Kirkpatrick.

“Non-real time [facial recognition technology] cannot be used to connect people as they go about their normal course of life and business,” Kirkpatrick said in the report. “However, law enforcement can use [facial recognition technology] to expedite the time-consuming manual process of connecting images from crime scenes to local mug shot databases.”

The ordinance that passed Tuesday night, however, applies to both real-time and non-real-time facial recognition technology.